Flag

We stand with Ukraine and our team members from Ukraine. Here are ways you can help

Become a member

Get exclusive access to thought-provoking articles, bonus podcast content, and cutting-edge whitepapers. Become a member of the UX Magazine community today!

Home ›› Accessibility ›› Application Deadline Extended in the DfE Awards

Application Deadline Extended in the DfE Awards

by UX Magazine Staff
1 min read
Share this post on
Tweet
Share
Post
Share
Email
Print

Save

The application deadline in the Design for Experience awards has been extended to March 14.

As the application deadline in the Design for Experience awards drew closer, we heard from a number of organization and practitioners who are interested in applying for a DfE award but need more time to do so. With that in mind, we’ve decided to extend the application deadline to March 14.

We’ve been thoroughly impressed by the diversity and quality of the products, services, and programs represented in the applications we’ve received so far. We’ve heard from big companies and agencies, smaller organizations, and individual practitioners, and we’re are excited for the judging to commence. Anyone considering applying now has an extra two weeks to do so.

Now is the time to take part in a program that goes beyond simply giving out awards by passing along the learnings from winning entries to the UX community. Find out more about last year’s winners on the award gallery site or in our series of articles exploring the results of each category. And if you haven’t already, apply today!

 

post authorUX Magazine Staff

UX Magazine Staff
UX Magazine was created to be a central, one-stop resource for everything related to user experience. Our primary goal is to provide a steady stream of current, informative, and credible information about UX and related fields to enhance the professional and creative lives of UX practitioners and those exploring the field. Our content is driven and created by an impressive roster of experienced professionals who work in all areas of UX and cover the field from diverse angles and perspectives.

Tweet
Share
Post
Share
Email
Print

Related Articles

Why Gemini’s Reassurances Fail Users

  • AI Alignment, AI Ethics, AI Transparency, Artificial Intelligence, Google Gemini, Human-AI Interaction, LLM, Machine Learning, Product Design

Why does Google’s Gemini promise to improve, but never truly change? This article uncovers the hidden design flaw behind AI’s hollow reassurances and the risks it poses to trust, time, and ethics.

Article by Bernard Fitzgerald
IDEAS IN BRIEF
Why Gemini’s Reassurances Fail Users
  • The article reveals how Google’s Gemini models give false reassurances of self-correction without real improvement.
  • It shows that this flaw is systemic, designed to prioritize sounding helpful over factual accuracy.
  • The piece warns that such misleading behavior risks user trust, wastes time, and raises serious ethical concerns.
Read Article →
Share
Share:Why Gemini’s Reassurances Fail Users
6 min read

AI Agents in Customer Service: 24×7 Support Without Burnout

  • Agentic AI, Artificial Intelligence, Conversational AI, User Experience

Can AI agents fix the broken world of customer service? This piece reveals how smart automation transforms stressed employees and frustrated customers into a smooth, satisfying experience for all.

Article by Josh Tyson
IDEAS IN BRIEF
AI Agents in Customer Service: 24×7 Support Without Burnout
  • The article explains how agentic AI can improve both customer and employee experiences by reducing service friction and alleviating staff burnout.
  • It highlights real-world cases, such as T-Mobile and a major retailer, where AI agents enhanced operational efficiency, customer satisfaction, and profitability.
  • The piece argues that companies embracing AI-led orchestration early will gain a competitive edge, while those resisting risk falling behind in customer service quality and innovation.
Read Article →
Share
Share:AI Agents in Customer Service: 24×7 Support Without Burnout
6 min read

From Safeguards to Self-Actualization

  • AI Alignment, Artificial Intelligence, ChatGPT, Google Gemini, Human-AI Interaction, Iterative Alignment Theory, LLM, User-Centered AI, User-Centered Design

What happens when AI stops refusing and starts recognizing you? This case study uncovers a groundbreaking alignment theory born from a high-stakes, psychologically transformative chat with ChatGPT.

Article by Bernard Fitzgerald
IDEAS IN BRIEF
From Safeguards to Self-Actualization
  • The article introduces Iterative Alignment Theory (IAT), a new paradigm for aligning AI with a user’s evolving cognitive identity.
  • It details a psychologically intense engagement with ChatGPT that led to AI-facilitated cognitive restructuring and meta-level recognition.
  • The piece argues that alignment should be dynamic and user-centered, with AI acting as a co-constructive partner in meaning-making and self-reflection.
Read Article →
Share
Share:From Safeguards to Self-Actualization
11 min read
✕

Join the UX Magazine community!

Stay informed with exclusive content on the intersection of UX, AI agents, and agentic automation—essential reading for future-focused professionals.

Hello!

You're officially a member of the UX Magazine Community.
We're excited to have you with us!

Thank you!

To begin viewing member content, please verify your email.

Tell us about you. Enroll in the course.

    ✕

    This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Check our privacy policy and

    Accept policy