We stand with Ukraine and our team members from Ukraine.

The Community Of Over 640,000

Home ›› Android ›› Let Users Drive Cross-Platform Design

Let Users Drive Cross-Platform Design

by Emma Lindahl
3 min read
Share this post on
Tweet
Share
Post
Share
Email
Print

Save

Designing the best experiences across platforms means being responsive to the user, not the device.

The word of the day driving cross-platform design seems to be consistency. Responsive design has enabled designers and builders all around the world to create digital experiences that adapt to your screen of choice. Whether it’s mobile-first or a desktop experience adapted to a smaller screen, the result becomes very much the same.

There is actually a part of this “same” that is important, and another part that isn’t—at least if you’re opting for the user perspective. When it comes to responsive design, availability is a key driving factor. Or, as Dr. Susan Weinschenk wrote in a 2013 article, “Unless you are sure that your target audience is visiting your website sitting in front of a large desktop all alone in a quiet space most of the time, you need to think about a multi-screen, active experience.” True that.

We have a hard time predicting how users will access our services, so naturally we want to please them everywhere. Responsive design also involves a great deal of familiarity and branding efforts. You want your users to recognize how to use and navigate your services and also to recognize them from a visual perspective, going for seamless brand recognition and integration on all fronts. Even gestures are something well-known smartphone manufacturers are fighting over, so that they, too, can be a brand feature. (Whether human-computer interaction is patentable is another question, one discussed in “Beauty is subjective.”)

But how does responsive design influence cross-platform design? Does it really involve the user or is it an effort to reduce the backend work of our multi-screen lives? Originally, responsive design referred to the inter-operational ability of software programs to run on several platforms. Two years ago, Jody Resnick told Forbes: “As the internet transforms further into a platform of services and user interfaces that tie those services together, leveraging this technology in the future will allow companies to integrate a plethora of back-end services, such as Facebook, Twitter, Salesforce.com, and Amazon Web Services, and then present the integrated data back out the front-end iad layer on a responsive design so the application looks great on all devices without custom coding needed for each device or screen size.”

Seems like a lot of inside-out efforts. And that’s all good. The intent, after all, is to create an available, smooth experience. But should responsive design and cross-platform design be driven by the same thinking? In its effort to reduce inconsistencies, responsive design has created a dogma around “access anywhere, similarity everywhere.”

Each task has a time, and a place. Be responsive to the user rather than the device.

Applied to cross-platform services, the thinking behind this dogma removes a great opportunity for adding extra value to a platform experience. Consistency fails to recognize that the situations that we use the different devices in are, in fact, already built into the devices that we’re using as functionality deliverables.

There are services released on different platforms that take great advantage of this. My bank service is one example (Scandinavian Nordea) where the app version offers a different, more lightweight experience focusing on cash status, transfer, and payment options as opposed to the desktop overload version.

The Evernote app is another, highlighting camera-related functionalities within the scope of making notes, while the desktop version puts emphasis on overview. Although entirely device-responsive versions of these services would make more sense than non-responsive (some is better than nothing), the current user-responsive versions delivers on function related to user needs. This is something I look forward seeing in more services, including several of the VOD (video on demand) services, where consistency is currently the driver of cross-platform design.

TV screens, mobile devices, laptops, outdoor screens, cinemas—at least still they represent differences to us. And while delivering on function and ultimately user needs won’t be a differentiating factor for all digital experiences, for some it will. The delivery on function, differentiating between devices in a cross-platform service family creates a great design opportunity to combine the unique features of different family members into an accumulated experience.

Dare to not allow your user to do everything everywhere. Dare to at least think about that. Each task has a time, and a place. Be responsive to the user rather than the device.

 

Image of small car courtesy Shutterstock.

post authorEmma Lindahl

Emma Lindahl, Emma Lindahl is a UX designer who has worked with VOD services, educational gaming, customer experience, and other fun stuff. She has a PhD in medical sciences, giving her a great understanding of experiment and method design. She loves to use imagination as a tool to facilitate the transformation of user insights into innovative services. From Hyper Island with love.​

Tweet
Share
Post
Share
Email
Print

Related Articles

Tips on how to champion HCD and design research to stakeholders and get them on board with all of your UX processes.

How to Champion HCD and Design Research to Stakeholders
  • The article covers:
    • The importance of stakeholder management
    • Challenges to overcome with research resisters
    • Common objections to doing user research and how to respond
Share:How to Champion HCD and Design Research to Stakeholders
8 min read
How to Champion HCD and Design Research to Stakeholders

Curious to know about a philosophy that liberates our innate need for control? Then read to find out.

A Philosophy for Systems Change
  • The author talks about the nature of systems change and unpacks the following ideas:
    • Dynamics of Change: Our Situations Devolve and Evolve
    • Wabi-Sabi: A Design Philosophy for Complexity
    • Social Systems: The Beauty of Imperfect, Impermanent, and Incomplete Information
    • Social Systems: The Beauty of Modest and Humble Learning
    • Social Systems: The Beauty of Unconventional Thinking
Share:A Philosophy for Systems Change
5 min read
A Philosophy for Systems Change

Technology makes seemingly inconvenient tasks easier — but at what cost?

The Value of Inconvenient Design
  • The article covers the problem of friction and its impact on design.
  • The author explains the problem friction brings to design value based on examples of IKEA, Facebook and Amazon.
Share:The Value of Inconvenient Design
8 min read
The Value of Inconvenient Design

This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Check our privacy policy and