Flag

We stand with Ukraine and our team members from Ukraine. Here are ways you can help

Get exclusive access to thought-provoking articles, bonus podcast content, and cutting-edge whitepapers. Become a member of the UX Magazine community today!

Home ›› Business Value and ROI ›› 6 Key Questions to Guide International UX Research ›› Making a Case for Animations and Interactivity

Making a Case for Animations and Interactivity

by Elias Parker
3 min read
Share this post on
Tweet
Share
Post
Share
Email
Print

Save

Animated user interface elements can increase your product’s usability, define its personality, and make it more fun to use, but they come at a significant cost.

From a design standpoint, we’re starting to think of apps more as interactive experiences and less as passive objects. This shift in mindset can largely be attributed to Apple’s iOS 7 overhaul, which emphasizes physics-driven animations. Since then, we’ve seen a slew of interesting animations work their way into some of the most popular apps.

With all the exciting motion UI elements out there, it’s easy to get caught up in the fun, while forgetting about the opportunity costs. On the other hand, spending the extra time on the right animations, for the right reasons, can increase usability, help define your brand’s personality, and create delight. In this post, we’ll examine animations and interactions implemented with purpose and consider whether they make sense for your brand.

Usability

For some apps, interactivity is a core component of the flow. In these instances, interactions guide users through the experience, keeping them oriented and contextually aware of their place in the app.

Pinterest

One of my favorite examples is in the Pinterest iPhone app. Using swipe gestures, users can swipe through pins and collections. The inclusion of this interactivity helps users navigate the app in a less cumbersome manner.

Pinterest animation

Swipe down to return.

Emotive Insight

Swipe left to continue in feed.

Emotive Insight

Swipe up for new feed

Circa App

Another app that does a great job of providing context through the use of interactivity is Circa, a news app that tracks stories you’ve followed, giving you periodic updates as they become available. A scrolling animation acts as a sort of visual timeline, with a dot denoting each new development in a story.

Circa animation

In both examples, the animations aren’t just frivolous inclusions. They actually provide real value to the app and its usability.

Personality

For other apps, interactions act as a way to communicate distinct brand characteristics and aid in users’ understanding of your brand. In this case, animations are a part of the branding exercise. Is your brand playful or serious? Robotic or bubbly? Choosing the proper animations will heighten users’ understanding of—and connection with—your brand.

Path & Tumblr

For Path, mobile is their only platform. By limiting users’ experience with their brand to this one context, they really have an advantage when it comes to using interactions to help define what Path is all about. Following suit, their animations are approachable and playful.

Path animation

Tumblr’s Android app has also been experimenting with this playful feel.

Tumblr animation

Tweetbot

Tweetbot is another app that uses distinct animations to communicate something relevant about their brand. Compared to Path and Tumblr, the Tweetbot app feels snappy and mechanical.

@Tweetbot’s animations contribute to the sense that the app is a robot and give it unique character

These animations contribute to the sense that the app is a robot and give the app unique character.

Emotive Insight

Delight

Other times apps include motion UI elements because they’re—for lack of a better word—fun. However, the amount of time put into designing and implementing these catchy animations can be a huge expense. Because of this, you will rarely see cash-strapped startups include these animations and interactivity. Overall, animations that fall into this category are going for the awe factor over the purpose factor.

Flickr

If you flip through the introductions screens of the Flickr app you probably won’t notice anything special initially. Slow down, and you’ll see that a lot of thought went into how the images animate. A combination of parallax layers and clever masking allows the drawing to transition in and out with a very illustrative quality as seen in the GIF below.

Emotive Insight

While it’s certainly a nifty little animation that caught our attention, it doesn’t make the most business sense for startups concerned with maximizing limited resources. Flickr is way past the initial funding phase and has the time and money to devote to dazzling end users with thoughtful details.

Conclusion

Striking a balance between creating a heightened user experience and acknowledging business constraints will ultimately determine the success of your app in the long run. Be mindful of why you are using an animation or interaction in your app before devoting precious resources to it. Do this by asking yourself if an animation is for usability, personality, or delight. If it doesn’t naturally fit into at least one of those categories, it’s probably not worth the effort.

For more motion UI design resources check out this post from BeyondKinetic.

 

Illustration of mobile gestures courtesy of Shutterstock.

Tweet
Share
Post
Share
Email
Print

Related Articles

Discover how “consent theater” manipulates the psychology of choice, and what ethical design should look like instead.

Article by Tushar Deshmukh
Consent Theater: Are Users Really in Control?
  • The article argues that digital consent mechanisms are designed to look ethical while engineering the opposite outcome.
  • It exposes how legal compliance and ethical design have become dangerously decoupled.
  • The piece challenges designers to recognize that user psychology can serve as a tool for empowerment or a means of manipulation — the choice is theirs.
Share:Consent Theater: Are Users Really in Control?
8 min read

Learn why the design-to-development pipeline is the launchpad your team inherited but never questioned.

Article by Erika Flowers
Zero Stage to Orbit
  • The article argues that the entire design-to-development pipeline is a multi-stage rocket — a system built around workarounds, not solutions.
  • It makes the case that AI agents don’t just improve the handoff problem; they eliminate the need for handoffs.
  • The piece challenges readers to ask not how to optimize their process, but why they’re still using it.
Share:Zero Stage to Orbit
14 min read

Unpack how dark patterns manipulate users, why they’re becoming a legal issue, and what ethical designers can do about it.

Article by Tushar Deshmukh
Dark Patterns: When Design Crosses the Line
  • The article makes a clear case: dark patterns aren’t accidents but deliberate design decisions that put business gains over people.
  • The piece reminds us that no short-term conversion bump is worth losing user trust for good.
Share:Dark Patterns: When Design Crosses the Line
7 min read

Join the UX Magazine community!

Stay informed with exclusive content on the intersection of UX, AI agents, and agentic automation—essential reading for future-focused professionals.

Hello!

You're officially a member of the UX Magazine Community.
We're excited to have you with us!

Thank you!

To begin viewing member content, please verify your email.

Get Paid to Test AI Products

Earn an average of $100 per test by reviewing AI-first product experiences and sharing your feedback.

    Tell us about you. Enroll in the course.

      This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Check our privacy policy and