Flag

We stand with Ukraine and our team members from Ukraine. Here are ways you can help

Get exclusive access to thought-provoking articles, bonus podcast content, and cutting-edge whitepapers. Become a member of the UX Magazine community today!

Home ›› The Influence of iOS 7 and Designing for Mobile in an Omnichannel World

The Influence of iOS 7 and Designing for Mobile in an Omnichannel World

by Nour Diab Yunes
3 min read
Share this post on
Tweet
Share
Post
Share
Email
Print

Save

With iOS 7, Apple seems poised to expand its reach into a wider portfolio of digital products, something designers should consider in the omnichannel world of mobile.

Digital design paradigms are shifting faster than ever before. In less than a decade, we have moved from point-and-click to skeuomorphism to flat design. This pace of change impacts designers who need to keep up with ever-changing standards, companies that have to manage increasing fragmentation and updates across platforms, and it also affects customers who have to process and adopt novel patterns while seeking familiarity in the tools that they use. In an omnichannel, ever-evolving world, how can designers manage all of this disruption?

As we look forward to what’s next in Apple’s iOS 8, we can learn from the influence that iOS 7 has had on driving mobile interface design. iOS 7’s shift to flat design has impacted both the design of new services and how existing ones are updated. Although flatness predates iOS 7 with Windows’ first mainstream introduction of the flat look in 2012, now that Apple has adopted a flat design language, they’ve created the benchmark for a new aesthetic style, which is shaping customer expectations.

Windows Surface Nokia Lumina 930

Left: Windows Surface – Right: Nokia Lumia 930

While there’s a desire to embrace the “new” and stay up-to-date with current standards, there needs to be a balance between maintaining the brand’s unique design language as well as ensuring consistency across channels as the market gets more saturated and complex experiences across devices become fragmented. Despite iOS 7’s new design language, Apple’s latest updates on the Mac OS have yet to embrace flat design, which introduces discrepancies between desktop, tablet, and mobile.

iPad, Mac, and iPhone

Messages App on iPad, Mac, and iPhone

Changing design aesthetics play a significant role in shaping user perception and, in turn, how one designs for these users. As new design styles are made mainstream, they provide us with completely new capabilities, from how we communicate and manage information to how we present ourselves and interact with others. These capabilities lead to the mass adoption and participation in a newly shared visual language.

In the digital world, design is an always-evolving and never-ending project. Once a design language becomes widespread, that same design is continuously iterated upon. When designing for a brand that spans several touchpoints—such as a bank, which offers their services at ATMs and through the web, mobile, and tablet—it’s important to consider how design can flow seamlessly across device types, while retaining nuanced system-specific components. With the proliferation of devices, designing services through the lens of the device type is no longer an efficient or scalable design strategy. In a device-agnostic era where users adopt multiple devices and operating systems—and expect brand consistency across touchpoints—digital design now requires a holistic approach to take users’ disparate multi-platform lifestyles and create one, seamless experience.

Instagram cross-platform

Left: Instagram iOS 7, September 2013 – Center: Instagram Windows Phone, November 2013 – Right: Instagram Android V5.1, March 2014

An effective design strategy must account for all of the different platforms and touchpoints it spans. In fact, this is what iOS 7 is setting Apple up to do, similar to how Microsoft’s Metro design guideline helped create consistency across their portfolio of products.

An effective design strategy must account for all of the different platforms and touchpoints it spans

With the advent of a new design aesthetic comes unexpected patterns of change, such as the speculation that Apple’s iOS 7 look and feel will allow Apple to reach beyond their products, touching a wider portfolio of digital devices, like in-car dashboards and smart watches.

But, how should other brands balance their distinct languages with the interaction and visual paradigms of the platforms they are accessible on?

There is certainly no obligation to adopt the “flat” look, but designers must place their users at the center of visual design decisions. Given the impact of Apple on design standards at large, it’s important to take into account what users are accustomed to and expect to see in order for the service to feel current and intuitive.

In big or small ways, good design improves people’s lives. It helps them do what they need to do with greater ease and delight. As designers this is our goal: to always strive to create engaging and useful experiences. Creating a design strategy that remains cohesive as users toggle between devices and touchpoints will help keep users engaged, consistently deliver value, and build a coherent experience for your brand.

Illustration of cross-platform devices coutesy Shutterstock.

post authorNour Diab Yunes

Nour Diab Yunes
Designer and entrepreneur with 10+ years of experience as a consultant in the design and tech industry, currently based in London. She founded Femmes Designers Ltd, which has grown to 15+ women since its launch in 2022. Femmes Designers is a creative community launched to inspire the next generation of makers while championing the work of artists, designers and scholars interested in how the contemporary arts and design interact with people, science and technology. Formerly, Nour worked as Service and Interaction Designer at Designit, Sapient and Fjord. Beyond project work, she is deeply passionate about the intersection between art, science and technology, where design can contribute not only aesthetically or within its field of practice, but can also contribute to various layers of daily life, such as to the evolution of behaviour practices, whether social or environmental. Instagram @femmesdesigners

Tweet
Share
Post
Share
Email
Print

Related Articles

Real engagement is about designing experiences that people want to have. Here are some things that games do well that most apps don’t.

Article by Montgomery Singman
Gamification 2.0. Beyond Points and Badges: Designing for Players, Not Metrics. Conclusion
  • Most apps use gamification as a manipulation layer to drive metrics, but people engage with things that are truly worthy of their time, not points or streak guilt.
  • Apps that people stick with do this by designing for intrinsic motivation, making the experience itself rewarding.
  • The true measure of success is whether users feel more capable, accomplished, and enriched for having used your app.
Share:Gamification 2.0. Beyond Points and Badges: Designing for Players, Not Metrics. Conclusion
8 min read

For researchers, AI tools are making the move from advising to building easier than ever. But the real obstacle was never technical. Meet the researchers who allowed themselves to create — and what the cost was.

Article by James Lang
The New Makers
  • The article says that becoming a maker as a researcher is less about learning new tools or skills and more about giving yourself a new identity, and that without fixing the internal permission structures that define your swim lane, even the most democratized AI tools won’t turn a researcher into a maker — you don’t have a founder; you have a frustrated advisor with a prototype.
Share:The New Makers
20 min read

Learn why authentic gamification is rooted in game genres rather than just collecting badges.

Article by Montgomery Singman
Gamification 2.0. Beyond Points and Badges: Designing for Players, Not Metrics. Chapter 5: Implementation
  • The article says that successful gamification is picking a game genre that fits your app’s core activities and user psychology, building satisfying intrinsic loops before adding extrinsic rewards, and iterating nonstop, and that without these foundations, you don’t have gamification; you have a progress bar that has a terminal point.
Share:Gamification 2.0. Beyond Points and Badges: Designing for Players, Not Metrics. Chapter 5: Implementation
5 min read

Join the UX Magazine community!

Stay informed with exclusive content on the intersection of UX, AI agents, and agentic automation—essential reading for future-focused professionals.

Hello!

You're officially a member of the UX Magazine Community.
We're excited to have you with us!

Thank you!

To begin viewing member content, please verify your email.

Get Paid to Test AI Products

Earn an average of $100 per test by reviewing AI-first product experiences and sharing your feedback.

    Tell us about you. Enroll in the course.

      This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Check our privacy policy and