Flag

We stand with Ukraine and our team members from Ukraine. Here are ways you can help

Become a member

Get exclusive access to thought-provoking articles, bonus podcast content, and cutting-edge whitepapers. Become a member of the UX Magazine community today!

Home ›› Design ›› A Six-Minute Breakdown of Gartner’s Top Conversational AI Platforms

Member-only story

A Six-Minute Breakdown of Gartner’s Top Conversational AI Platforms

by UX Magazine Staff
11 min read
Share this post on
Tweet
Share
Post
Share
Email
Print

Save

There’s a ton of noise, promises and exaggerations flying around. Here’s a breakdown of the sixteen conversational AI platforms in Gartner’s 2019 Market Guide.

With so much noise and hyperbole surrounding today’s race for AI and hyper-automation, choosing a conversational AI platform is a daunting task.

You might be a problem solver at an enterprise aiming to accelerate adoption of AI and conversational technology, a designer looking to create more useful chatbot experiences, or analyst researching tools for iterative, rapid hyper-automation of workflows and business processes. No matter your level of experience or technical background, tools for designing and deploying conversational AI applications are getting easier and better, and some have focused their design around user experience. We took our best shot at evaluating and summarizing the list of top platforms that Gartner Research included in their 2019 Market Guide for Conversational Platforms. 

Become a member to read the whole content.

Become a member
post authorUX Magazine Staff

UX Magazine Staff
UX Magazine was created to be a central, one-stop resource for everything related to user experience. Our primary goal is to provide a steady stream of current, informative, and credible information about UX and related fields to enhance the professional and creative lives of UX practitioners and those exploring the field. Our content is driven and created by an impressive roster of experienced professionals who work in all areas of UX and cover the field from diverse angles and perspectives.

Tweet
Share
Post
Share
Email
Print

Related Articles

Why Reading on Mobile Is Uniquely Challenging

  • Content Strategy, Mobile UX/Usability, Research Methods and Techniques, Usability Testing, User Research, UX Design

Discover how a simple comprehension test reveals if mobile content is too hard to read.

Article by Paivi Salminen
IDEAS IN BRIEF
Why Reading on Mobile Is Uniquely Challenging
  • The article explains why mobile reading is harder: small screens and distractions make people miss information even when it’s there.
  • It introduces the cloze test, which removes words to measure real understanding: comprehension drops from 39% on desktop to 19% on mobile.
  • The piece argues that mobile content needs simpler language because the real question is: Does this make sense when life gets in the way?
Read Article →
Share
Share:Why Reading on Mobile Is Uniquely Challenging
4 min read

Your Design System Works in Figma. Does It Work in Code?

  • Artificial Intelligence, Design Systems, Figma, Product Design, UX Design

Learn how to build systems where design explicitly models development, handoff is automatic, and AI can extend your work reliably.

Article by Jim Gulsen
IDEAS IN BRIEF
Your Design System Works in Figma. Does It Work in Code?
  • The article explains why many design systems don’t work well: designs made in Figma don’t translate well into code.
  • It introduces five practices: structure frames like code, use fewer components with more variants, organize by how both designers and developers actually work, let AI check your naming, and build documentation into your daily workflow.
  • The piece says that good design systems are the same in design and development, and when they match, everything just works.
Read Article →
Share
Share:Your Design System Works in Figma. Does It Work in Code?
6 min read

Stop Building Streetlamp Models: The Decision-First Framework for AI Products

  • Artificial Intelligence, Product Management, User-Centered AI, UX Design, UX for AI

Find out how to stop building where the data is bright and start building where the problem actually is.

Article by Núria Badia Comas
IDEAS IN BRIEF
Stop Building Streetlamp Models: The Decision-First Framework for AI Products
  • The article reveals that most AI projects fail because teams focus on what’s possible instead of what users actually need.
  • It introduces the AI-Question Framework, asking three key questions: Does it matter? Do you have the data? Can you handle the mistakes?
  • The piece concludes that successful AI products start with the right question, not with what the AI can do.
Read Article →
Share
Share:Stop Building Streetlamp Models: The Decision-First Framework for AI Products
5 min read
✕

Join the UX Magazine community!

Stay informed with exclusive content on the intersection of UX, AI agents, and agentic automation—essential reading for future-focused professionals.

Hello!

You're officially a member of the UX Magazine Community.
We're excited to have you with us!

Thank you!

To begin viewing member content, please verify your email.

✕

Get Paid to Test AI Products

Earn an average of $100 per test by reviewing AI-first product experiences and sharing your feedback.

    Tell us about you. Enroll in the course.

      ✕

      This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Check our privacy policy and

      Accept policy