Flag

We stand with Ukraine and our team members from Ukraine. Here are ways you can help

Become a member

Get exclusive access to thought-provoking articles, bonus podcast content, and cutting-edge whitepapers. Become a member of the UX Magazine community today!

Home ›› Android ›› In Conversation with Sergio Nouvel

In Conversation with Sergio Nouvel

by Danny Bluestone
1 min read
Share this post on
Tweet
Share
Post
Share
Email
Print

Save

We talk with Sergio Nouvel—co-founder of Continuum in Lima, Peru—author of our very popular and very controversial article, “Why Web Design is Dead.”

Just yesterday I had the chance to talk with Sergio Nouvel, author of the very popular and very convtroversial UX Mag article, “Why Web Design is Dead.”

Sergio is was born in Chile and is the Co-Founder and Director of Continuum in Lima, Peru. He comes from a graphic design background and has broadened his scope of what it means to be a designer in the digital age. Here we talk about the limitations of designing for desktop, the rise of mobile, the disappearance of screens, and why web design is (or isn’t) dying. (MP3)

post authorDanny Bluestone

Danny Bluestone
Danny is the Founder and CEO of Cyber-Duck, a leading full service digital agency. Inspired by fusing creative, technical, and marketing expertise into a superior user experience, he established the agency in 2005. Now, they work internationally with global brands including Cancer Research Technology, The EU, and Arsenal FC. Leading Cyber-Duck, Danny continues to refine their accredited design process, drawing on lean and agile management methodologies, alongside creative R&D. He enjoys sharing expertise with enterprise, UX, and technology communities, including the UKTI, UX London, and UXPA. His digital insights have been featured in UX Magazine, Econsultancy, and Smashing Magazine.

Tweet
Share
Post
Share
Email
Print

Related Articles

AI Is Your New Intern, Not Your Replacement

  • Artificial Intelligence, Design Leadership, Future of Work, Human-AI Collaboration, Product Design, User Experience, UX × AI Series, UX Design

AI can create wireframes, synthesize research, and draft copy fast. What it can’t do: understand your users, carry context, or be accountable when something goes wrong. That’s still you.

Article by Tushar Deshmukh
IDEAS IN BRIEF
AI Is Your New Intern, Not Your Replacement
  • AI is not replacing UX pros; it’s automating repetitive tasks and augmenting human capabilities.
  • Think of AI as an intern: quick, smart, but dependent on human direction, context, and judgment.
  • Human skills like empathy, research, systems thinking, and ethical decision-making are more important than ever.
  • The future belongs to designers who incorporate AI to accelerate execution and devote more time to strategic, human-centered work.
Read Article →
Share
Share:AI Is Your New Intern, Not Your Replacement
20 min read

The Agile Trap Designers Fall into: Feeding the Beast

  • Agile, Agile UX, Design Systems, Design Thinking, Product Design, UX Design, UX Strategy

Another lesson from studying UX with Laura Klein.

Article by Paivi Salminen
IDEAS IN BRIEF
The Agile Trap Designers Fall into: Feeding the Beast
  • Agile teams are fast, but designers get stuck in an infinite loop of visual work: redesigning the same components over and over instead of solving real UX problems.
  • Design systems break that cycle, defining the building blocks once, freeing designers to focus on how the product works, not how it looks.
  • When the basics are in place, teams can start working together sooner, prototype faster, and release incremental features without the interface falling apart.
Read Article →
Share
Share:The Agile Trap Designers Fall into: Feeding the Beast
4 min read

Gamification 2.0. Beyond Points and Badges: Designing for Players, Not Metrics. Conclusion

  • Behavioral Design, Game Design, Gamification Series, Human-Centered Design, Product Design, User Experience, UX Design

Real engagement is about designing experiences that people want to have. Here are some things that games do well that most apps don’t.

Article by Montgomery Singman
IDEAS IN BRIEF
Gamification 2.0. Beyond Points and Badges: Designing for Players, Not Metrics. Conclusion
  • Most apps use gamification as a manipulation layer to drive metrics, but people engage with things that are truly worthy of their time, not points or streak guilt.
  • Apps that people stick with do this by designing for intrinsic motivation, making the experience itself rewarding.
  • The true measure of success is whether users feel more capable, accomplished, and enriched for having used your app.
Read Article →
Share
Share:Gamification 2.0. Beyond Points and Badges: Designing for Players, Not Metrics. Conclusion
8 min read
✕

Join the UX Magazine community!

Stay informed with exclusive content on the intersection of UX, AI agents, and agentic automation—essential reading for future-focused professionals.

Hello!

You're officially a member of the UX Magazine Community.
We're excited to have you with us!

Thank you!

To begin viewing member content, please verify your email.

✕

Get Paid to Test AI Products

Earn an average of $100 per test by reviewing AI-first product experiences and sharing your feedback.

    Tell us about you. Enroll in the course.

      ✕

      This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Check our privacy policy and

      Accept policy