Flag

We stand with Ukraine and our team members from Ukraine. Here are ways you can help

Get exclusive access to thought-provoking articles, bonus podcast content, and cutting-edge whitepapers. Become a member of the UX Magazine community today!

Home ›› Android ›› Why This Apple Guy Believes in Google’s Material Design

Why This Apple Guy Believes in Google’s Material Design

by Jordan Crone
3 min read
Share this post on
Tweet
Share
Post
Share
Email
Print

Save

A refreshing, simplified design language that encourages interaction and implies depth, Google’s Material Design could change the face of experience design.

I am an apple guy. I have been since I got my first Mac when I was 16. I’m typing this on a MacBook Pro that’s sitting beside my iPhone 6. So when Google announced it’s new design language, Material Design, at Google I/O in June I quickly disregarded the announcement.

But as time went on and Google products that I regularly used began adapting the look, I started questioning what it meant to me as a user and to the design world as a whole.

What is Material Design?

Google defines Material Design as “design by seeking to build experiences that surprise and enlighten our users in equal measure.” In a nutshell, it’s a refreshing, simplified design language that encourages interaction and implies depth. Here’s why I believe in it:

It Will Bring Uniformity to Google Products Across Devices

Material design will bring visual and experiential uniformity to Google products across devices, thus strengthening the brand and ultimately the company as a whole while encouraging the continuity principle.

Material design will bring Google something it’s lacked for so long—uniformity across products. There are clear contrasts in both user interfaces and user experiences across products like Android, Chrome, and Gmail.

disparate settings navigation

Something as simple as accessing settings is done three different ways across these products alone

While the Google name is strong, its products lack a consistency that, if implemented well and fully across products, will strengthen its name and brand image—akin to.

Hamburger Menus Are Becoming More and More Common in Web and App Design

What Google has done by including a “+” and hamburger menu as the two main forms of navigation is simplify the user experience dramatically. The user really only has two options accessing actions within the application (not including card interactions, which we will touch on that later).

The “+” is a clear indication that selecting it will create something or add something. Though vague, it limits the users actions to only a few logical assumptions as to its meaning even without an explicit label.

Even though hamburger menus are ambiguous and generally discouraged without having some kind of label, they’re becoming more and more adopted in web and app design as a catch all for “everything else.” Where else will users click to perform an action if not wanting to add or create something? Logic says this hamburger button.

Card Displays, Lists, Interactivity, and Depth Encourage Scrolling

In addition to tying related items together, cards are “typically an entry point to more complex and detailed information” (Material Design Guidelines). In applications like Inbox, cards contain message content. Their shadows, typography and buttons imply depth à la additional content within each card. Accessing additional card information requires a click.

It’s only a matter of time before Material Design is the norm

Although not necessarily an intuitive action, learning it is essential to Material Design and translates consistently across applications. When the cards expand or contract upon selection, they change states—often with an increase in shadow and opacity, subtly drawing users’ attentions to that item only. This minor, fun action increases interactivity and changes the way we see the design.

The stacked card display also encourages scrolling. This suits mobile devices well, considering horizontal scrolling is a poor user experience and despite popular perception, users will scroll vertically if your content is intriguing to them.

The Interactions Make Sense

Both interactivity and depth are natural outside of digital so it only makes sense to translate them onto devices. The user learning curve is therefor lowered, thus the design becoming more intuitive.

It’s Refreshing and Exciting

The Roboto font face, flat iconography, and vibrant color palette are several items that breathe freshness into Material Design. Establishing a design language is also a bold step for Google and counters Apple’s distinct and matured look.

Its UI is Defined

Having clearly defined colors schemes, spacing, and rules makes material design easily duplicable. This will help the style grow more rapidly and remain consistent across sites and devices.

sample colors for Google's MAterial Design

Sample colors

I Have To Believe in It

Between Google Search, Gmail, and Android, Google has one of the largest reaches of any tech company in the world. It’s only a matter of time before Material Design is the norm. It’s Google’s world, we’re just living in it.

post authorJordan Crone

Jordan Crone
This user does not have bio yet.

Tweet
Share
Post
Share
Email
Print

Related Articles

Why does Google’s Gemini promise to improve, but never truly change? This article uncovers the hidden design flaw behind AI’s hollow reassurances and the risks it poses to trust, time, and ethics.

Article by Bernard Fitzgerald
Why Gemini’s Reassurances Fail Users
  • The article reveals how Google’s Gemini models give false reassurances of self-correction without real improvement.
  • It shows that this flaw is systemic, designed to prioritize sounding helpful over factual accuracy.
  • The piece warns that such misleading behavior risks user trust, wastes time, and raises serious ethical concerns.
Share:Why Gemini’s Reassurances Fail Users
6 min read

AI is raising the bar for everyone, but what happens when the space to learn, fail, and grow quietly disappears?

Article by Thasya Ingriany
Everyone’s a 10x Employee now. But at What Cost?
  • The article demonstrates how AI-driven tools are raising expectations, prompting even junior roles to demand senior-level judgment.
  • It warns that automation is erasing early-career learning opportunities once crucial for developing design intuition.
  • The piece argues that while AI boosts output, it can’t replace the slow, human process of building creative judgment.
Share:Everyone’s a 10x Employee now. But at What Cost?
6 min read

Can AI agents fix the broken world of customer service? This piece reveals how smart automation transforms stressed employees and frustrated customers into a smooth, satisfying experience for all.

Article by Josh Tyson
AI Agents in Customer Service: 24×7 Support Without Burnout
  • The article explains how agentic AI can improve both customer and employee experiences by reducing service friction and alleviating staff burnout.
  • It highlights real-world cases, such as T-Mobile and a major retailer, where AI agents enhanced operational efficiency, customer satisfaction, and profitability.
  • The piece argues that companies embracing AI-led orchestration early will gain a competitive edge, while those resisting risk falling behind in customer service quality and innovation.
Share:AI Agents in Customer Service: 24×7 Support Without Burnout
6 min read

Join the UX Magazine community!

Stay informed with exclusive content on the intersection of UX, AI agents, and agentic automation—essential reading for future-focused professionals.

Hello!

You're officially a member of the UX Magazine Community.
We're excited to have you with us!

Thank you!

To begin viewing member content, please verify your email.

Tell us about you. Enroll in the course.

    This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Check our privacy policy and