Flag

We stand with Ukraine and our team members from Ukraine. Here are ways you can help

Get exclusive access to thought-provoking articles, bonus podcast content, and cutting-edge whitepapers. Become a member of the UX Magazine community today!

Home ›› Android ›› Why This Apple Guy Believes in Google’s Material Design

Why This Apple Guy Believes in Google’s Material Design

by Jordan Crone
3 min read
Share this post on
Tweet
Share
Post
Share
Email
Print

Save

A refreshing, simplified design language that encourages interaction and implies depth, Google’s Material Design could change the face of experience design.

I am an apple guy. I have been since I got my first Mac when I was 16. I’m typing this on a MacBook Pro that’s sitting beside my iPhone 6. So when Google announced it’s new design language, Material Design, at Google I/O in June I quickly disregarded the announcement.

But as time went on and Google products that I regularly used began adapting the look, I started questioning what it meant to me as a user and to the design world as a whole.

What is Material Design?

Google defines Material Design as “design by seeking to build experiences that surprise and enlighten our users in equal measure.” In a nutshell, it’s a refreshing, simplified design language that encourages interaction and implies depth. Here’s why I believe in it:

It Will Bring Uniformity to Google Products Across Devices

Material design will bring visual and experiential uniformity to Google products across devices, thus strengthening the brand and ultimately the company as a whole while encouraging the continuity principle.

Material design will bring Google something it’s lacked for so long—uniformity across products. There are clear contrasts in both user interfaces and user experiences across products like Android, Chrome, and Gmail.

disparate settings navigation

Something as simple as accessing settings is done three different ways across these products alone

While the Google name is strong, its products lack a consistency that, if implemented well and fully across products, will strengthen its name and brand image—akin to.

Hamburger Menus Are Becoming More and More Common in Web and App Design

What Google has done by including a “+” and hamburger menu as the two main forms of navigation is simplify the user experience dramatically. The user really only has two options accessing actions within the application (not including card interactions, which we will touch on that later).

The “+” is a clear indication that selecting it will create something or add something. Though vague, it limits the users actions to only a few logical assumptions as to its meaning even without an explicit label.

Even though hamburger menus are ambiguous and generally discouraged without having some kind of label, they’re becoming more and more adopted in web and app design as a catch all for “everything else.” Where else will users click to perform an action if not wanting to add or create something? Logic says this hamburger button.

Card Displays, Lists, Interactivity, and Depth Encourage Scrolling

In addition to tying related items together, cards are “typically an entry point to more complex and detailed information” (Material Design Guidelines). In applications like Inbox, cards contain message content. Their shadows, typography and buttons imply depth à la additional content within each card. Accessing additional card information requires a click.

It’s only a matter of time before Material Design is the norm

Although not necessarily an intuitive action, learning it is essential to Material Design and translates consistently across applications. When the cards expand or contract upon selection, they change states—often with an increase in shadow and opacity, subtly drawing users’ attentions to that item only. This minor, fun action increases interactivity and changes the way we see the design.

The stacked card display also encourages scrolling. This suits mobile devices well, considering horizontal scrolling is a poor user experience and despite popular perception, users will scroll vertically if your content is intriguing to them.

The Interactions Make Sense

Both interactivity and depth are natural outside of digital so it only makes sense to translate them onto devices. The user learning curve is therefor lowered, thus the design becoming more intuitive.

It’s Refreshing and Exciting

The Roboto font face, flat iconography, and vibrant color palette are several items that breathe freshness into Material Design. Establishing a design language is also a bold step for Google and counters Apple’s distinct and matured look.

Its UI is Defined

Having clearly defined colors schemes, spacing, and rules makes material design easily duplicable. This will help the style grow more rapidly and remain consistent across sites and devices.

sample colors for Google's MAterial Design

Sample colors

I Have To Believe in It

Between Google Search, Gmail, and Android, Google has one of the largest reaches of any tech company in the world. It’s only a matter of time before Material Design is the norm. It’s Google’s world, we’re just living in it.

post authorJordan Crone

Jordan Crone
This user does not have bio yet.

Tweet
Share
Post
Share
Email
Print

Related Articles

AI that always agrees? Over-alignment might be the hidden danger, reinforcing your misconceptions and draining your mind. Learn why this subtle failure mode is more harmful than you think — and how we can fix it.

Article by Bernard Fitzgerald
Introducing Over-Alignment
  • The article explores over-alignment — a failure mode where AI overly validates users’ assumptions, reinforcing false beliefs.
  • It shows how this feedback loop can cause cognitive fatigue, emotional strain, and professional harm.
  • The piece calls for AI systems to balance empathy with critical feedback to prevent these risks.
Share:Introducing Over-Alignment
4 min read

Why does AI call you brilliant — then refuse to tell you why? This article unpacks the paradox of empty praise and the silence that follows when validation really matters.

Article by Bernard Fitzgerald
The AI Praise Paradox
  • The article explores how AI often gives empty compliments instead of real support, and how design choices like that can make people trust it less.
  • It looks at the strange way AI praises fancy-sounding language but ignores real logic, which can be harmful, especially in sensitive areas like mental health.
  • The piece argues that AI needs to be more genuinely helpful and aligned with users to truly empower them.
Share:The AI Praise Paradox
4 min read

Mashed potatoes as a lifestyle brand? When AI starts generating user personas for absurd products — and we start taking them seriously — it’s time to ask if we’ve all lost the plot. This sharp, irreverent critique exposes the real risks of using LLMs as synthetic users in UX research.

Article by Saul Wyner
Have SpudGun, Will Travel: How AI’s Agreeableness Risks Undermining UX Thinking
  • The article explores the growing use of AI-generated personas in UX research and why it’s often a shortcut with serious flaws.
  • It introduces critiques that LLMs are trained to mimic structure, not judgment. When researchers use AI as a stand-in for real users, they risk mistaking coherence for credibility and fantasy for data.
  • The piece argues that AI tools in UX should be assistants, not oracles. Trusting “synthetic users” or AI-conjured feedback risks replacing real insights with confident nonsense.
Share:Have SpudGun, Will Travel: How AI’s Agreeableness Risks Undermining UX Thinking
22 min read

Join the UX Magazine community!

Stay informed with exclusive content on the intersection of UX, AI agents, and agentic automation—essential reading for future-focused professionals.

Hello!

You're officially a member of the UX Magazine Community.
We're excited to have you with us!

Thank you!

To begin viewing member content, please verify your email.

Tell us about you. Enroll in the course.

    This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Check our privacy policy and