We stand with Ukraine and our team members from Ukraine.

The Community Of Over 640,000

Home ›› Android ›› Why This Apple Guy Believes in Google’s Material Design

Why This Apple Guy Believes in Google’s Material Design

by Jordan Crone
3 min read
Share this post on
Tweet
Share
Post
Share
Email
Print

Save

A refreshing, simplified design language that encourages interaction and implies depth, Google’s Material Design could change the face of experience design.

I am an apple guy. I have been since I got my first Mac when I was 16. I’m typing this on a MacBook Pro that’s sitting beside my iPhone 6. So when Google announced it’s new design language, Material Design, at Google I/O in June I quickly disregarded the announcement.

But as time went on and Google products that I regularly used began adapting the look, I started questioning what it meant to me as a user and to the design world as a whole.

What is Material Design?

Google defines Material Design as “design by seeking to build experiences that surprise and enlighten our users in equal measure.” In a nutshell, it’s a refreshing, simplified design language that encourages interaction and implies depth. Here’s why I believe in it:

It Will Bring Uniformity to Google Products Across Devices

Material design will bring visual and experiential uniformity to Google products across devices, thus strengthening the brand and ultimately the company as a whole while encouraging the continuity principle.

Material design will bring Google something it’s lacked for so long—uniformity across products. There are clear contrasts in both user interfaces and user experiences across products like Android, Chrome, and Gmail.

disparate settings navigation

Something as simple as accessing settings is done three different ways across these products alone

While the Google name is strong, its products lack a consistency that, if implemented well and fully across products, will strengthen its name and brand image—akin to.

Hamburger Menus Are Becoming More and More Common in Web and App Design

What Google has done by including a “+” and hamburger menu as the two main forms of navigation is simplify the user experience dramatically. The user really only has two options accessing actions within the application (not including card interactions, which we will touch on that later).

The “+” is a clear indication that selecting it will create something or add something. Though vague, it limits the users actions to only a few logical assumptions as to its meaning even without an explicit label.

Even though hamburger menus are ambiguous and generally discouraged without having some kind of label, they’re becoming more and more adopted in web and app design as a catch all for “everything else.” Where else will users click to perform an action if not wanting to add or create something? Logic says this hamburger button.

Card Displays, Lists, Interactivity, and Depth Encourage Scrolling

In addition to tying related items together, cards are “typically an entry point to more complex and detailed information” (Material Design Guidelines). In applications like Inbox, cards contain message content. Their shadows, typography and buttons imply depth à la additional content within each card. Accessing additional card information requires a click.

It’s only a matter of time before Material Design is the norm

Although not necessarily an intuitive action, learning it is essential to Material Design and translates consistently across applications. When the cards expand or contract upon selection, they change states—often with an increase in shadow and opacity, subtly drawing users’ attentions to that item only. This minor, fun action increases interactivity and changes the way we see the design.

The stacked card display also encourages scrolling. This suits mobile devices well, considering horizontal scrolling is a poor user experience and despite popular perception, users will scroll vertically if your content is intriguing to them.

The Interactions Make Sense

Both interactivity and depth are natural outside of digital so it only makes sense to translate them onto devices. The user learning curve is therefor lowered, thus the design becoming more intuitive.

It’s Refreshing and Exciting

The Roboto font face, flat iconography, and vibrant color palette are several items that breathe freshness into Material Design. Establishing a design language is also a bold step for Google and counters Apple’s distinct and matured look.

Its UI is Defined

Having clearly defined colors schemes, spacing, and rules makes material design easily duplicable. This will help the style grow more rapidly and remain consistent across sites and devices.

sample colors for Google's MAterial Design

Sample colors

I Have To Believe in It

Between Google Search, Gmail, and Android, Google has one of the largest reaches of any tech company in the world. It’s only a matter of time before Material Design is the norm. It’s Google’s world, we’re just living in it.

post authorJordan Crone

Jordan Crone, This user does not have bio yet.

Tweet
Share
Post
Share
Email
Print

Related Articles

Building effective partnerships with PMs requires stepping outside of any frustration, ego, or resentment at being ignored, and building empathy. How to do that? Here is what we’re going to find out.

How To Research So PMs Will Listen
  • PMs are the most critical audiences for research, they are also often the hardest to convince, and the source of many of researchers’ frustrations and heartaches.
  • Building effective partnerships with PMs requires stepping outside of any frustration, ego, or resentment at being ignored, and building empathy.
  • The author shares:
    • Some practices of working with PMs
    • Questions to ask PMs and stakeholders
  • The baseline expectation setting:
    • Level set
    • Set guardrails based on your role
    • Ask for candid feedback and engagement
    • No surprises
  • When researchers and PMs are in conflict or in separate silos, neither role gets the value of the other, but strong researcher-pm partnerships can be game-changing for extending the strategic impact and influence of both design and research.
Share:How To Research So PMs Will Listen
6 min read
How to research so PMs will listen
How To Empower An Organization Through Design?
  • The author believes that the following reasons are why design/branding/marketing agencies end up damaging the image of design as a tool for getting results:
    • Lots of jargon and little to no action at a fundamental level.
    • Large companies with “foolproof” processes.
    • Fake cases and invented touch points
    • Romanticized view of consumers
  • In order to centralize an organization, designers need to map its interdependence relationships and understand how a project can strengthen all sectors in an equal way.
Share:How To Empower An Organization Through Design?
4 min read
How to empower an organization through design?

And, Is OneReach Under The Radar By Design?

Is OneReach AI The Tesla Of Conversational AI?
  • The author gives his perspective on OneReach.ai as the top scorer in the Gartner 2022 report.
  • The author believes OneReach.ai to be one of the most granular no-code environments that support an exceptional degree of fine tuning.
  • The author refers to the platform as an orchestration canvas, where multiple processes can be orchestrated for multi-dimensional customer service, and gives some details on how the platform works as a single front-door for customers.
  • Cobus Greyling explores two cautions from Gartner about the OneReach.ai platform.
  • He concludes that voice is a strength of OneReach.ai and the company has extreme focus on customer experience, and orchestrating experiences
Share:Is OneReach AI The Tesla Of Conversational AI?
4 min read
Is OneReach AI The Tesla Of Conversational AI?

This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Check our privacy policy and