Flag

We stand with Ukraine and our team members from Ukraine. Here are ways you can help

Get exclusive access to thought-provoking articles, bonus podcast content, and cutting-edge whitepapers. Become a member of the UX Magazine community today!

Home ›› Business Value and ROI ›› 6 Key Questions to Guide International UX Research ›› Interactions that Change the Way Customers Make Choices

Interactions that Change the Way Customers Make Choices

by UX Magazine Staff
4 min read
Share this post on
Tweet
Share
Post
Share
Email
Print

Save

A closer look at the results in the Interaction Design Innovation category of the international Design for Experience awards.

Shopping for new eyeglasses can be a frustrating experience. Of the scores of frames lining a purveyor’s wall, none have lenses with your prescription. Squinting at yourself in the mirror won’t give you a real sense of what a pair looks like on your face.

In an effort to improve the experience, LensCrafters and SapientNitro decided to alter the way customers interact with the mirrors in their stores, winning the a Design for Experience award in the Interaction Design Innovation category.

A team of designers, copywriters, project managers, UX practitioners, technology specialists, industrial designers, and store designers spent six months creating a digital mirror installation called myLook that customers can use to capture photos of themselves in new frames and then look at them wearing their current prescription. They can also compare multiple frames from multiple angles and share photos on Facebook for feedback from friends and family.

“The solution SapientNitro created for LensCrafters shows genuine innovation, providing a good solution to a clear problem,” Chris Noessel, a judge in the competition said. “Solid technical design is apparent across the functional and aesthetic elements of the installation, and everything stays on-brand.”

Noessel also liked the integration of social media functions, butt wondered why they’d didn’t also create an app, so people could use the service on their own devices when there’s a line at the kiosk. While an app might not be in the works, myLook is evolving, with version 2.0 set to roll out in hundreds of stores coast to coast over the next couple of years.

Now, What to Watch?

According to Netflix, a finalist in this category, their members spend over 1 billion hours watching each month and the majortiy of that watching is done in front of a TV. With the sprawling amount of video content the service offers, selecting something to watch can become a spiraling descent into indecision. A response to that problem came in the form of Netfilx’s recently updated TV experience was the biggest update in their history, altering the way users interact with their content on Roku boxes, Smart TVs, Blu-ray players, PlayStation consoles, and Xbox 360.

“Netflix’s new interface shifts the experience of browsing titles from the feeling of wandering through a video store looking at DVD cases closer to the sensation of watching a preview, through screen grabs, more detailed synopses, and personalized details delivered in context” said Josh Tyson, another judge in the competition.

Most video discovery experiences simply replicate the walls and aisles of a physical video store

“We’ve long been cognizant of the fact that most video discovery experiences do no more than replicate the walls and aisles of a physical video store,” says Senior User Experience Manager at Netflix, Alvin Lee. “As a model for video discovery, this is an unimaginative, limiting construct. We asked ourselves how we could do better than that for our users: how can we better express the appeal of our movies and TV shows, the power of our personalization, and the value of our service?”

According to Lee, the answer was getting out of the way and letting the richness of their content speak for itself—in effect, letting the content become the user experience.

“This is the essence of our cinematic UI direction,” Lee says. “[It’s] based on the principles that are at the foundation of a good movie or TV show: visually rich presentation; effective storytelling; emotionally connecting and visceral; immersive; and ultimately, entertaining.”

Plenty of products and service providers have stumbled toward the integration of TVs and mobile and desktop computers, but it seems inevitable that they will one day soon become part of a broader online ecosystem, something the team at Netflix is aware of.

“In many ways, we already have expressions of this idea in our current experiences. Seamlessly picking up from where you are in a movie or TV show on any device and the ability to initiate and control playback on TV through a cellphone or tablet are two examples of how we’ve already been thinking of the multi-device experience more holistically. The difference for us is that we don’t stumble along and take blind stabs. We do a lot of qualitative and quantitative testing to inform us as to what the right features and experiences are.”

Interact with This

There were other notable applications in the Design for Experience awards that demonstrated new ways of approaching interaction design:

Cundari developed an app that lets patients at Toronto’s Hospital for Sick Children turn their stay into an interactive adventure with elements of gamification. Continuum sought to change the way customers interact with banks by giving users more control. In a similar realm, Experientia created the BancoSmart ATM, which uses enhanced touchscreen technology to enrich the ATM experience.

post authorUX Magazine Staff

UX Magazine Staff
UX Magazine was created to be a central, one-stop resource for everything related to user experience. Our primary goal is to provide a steady stream of current, informative, and credible information about UX and related fields to enhance the professional and creative lives of UX practitioners and those exploring the field. Our content is driven and created by an impressive roster of experienced professionals who work in all areas of UX and cover the field from diverse angles and perspectives.

Tweet
Share
Post
Share
Email
Print

Related Articles

Why do designers grumble at the mere mention of PowerPoint? Discover smart strategies that turn frustration into creative solutions.

Article by Jim Gulsen
Why Designers Hate PowerPoint (and How to Fix It)
  • The article examines why PowerPoint often frustrates designers, from its limited design capabilities to inefficient workflows, and explores opportunities to bridge those gaps.
  • It highlights strategies like building systematic design elements, creating templates, and augmenting slides with other design tools.
  • The piece underscores the importance of collaboration, simplicity, and proactive planning to elevate design and streamline workflows.
  • It highlights practical methods to help designers balance quality and speed for presentations that are both functional and visually engaging.
Share:Why Designers Hate PowerPoint (and How to Fix It)
4 min read

Struggling with PowerPoint’s design limitations? This step-by-step guide shows you how to build systematic design solutions, from mastering slide layouts to using sticker sheets for patterns. Learn to create polished, professional presentations with smart workarounds and helpful tips.

Article by Jim Gulsen
A Step-by-Step Guide to Creating a “Design System” in PowerPoint
  • The article gives a step-by-step guide to building systematic patterns in PowerPoint. It talks about the program’s limitations and gives essential tips like mastering slide layouts and customizing text settings.
  • It suggests using PowerPoint’s automated features carefully and advocating for manual workarounds to elevate quality.
  • The piece introduces creating sticker sheets for reusable design components and highlights strategies for successful workflows.
Share:A Step-by-Step Guide to Creating a “Design System” in PowerPoint
5 min read

Publishing in HCI and design research can feel overwhelming, especially for newcomers. This guide breaks down the process — from choosing the right venue to writing, submitting, and handling revisions. Whether you’re aiming for conferences or journals, learn key strategies to navigate academic publishing with confidence.

Article by Malak Sadek
A Guide to Publishing Human-Computer Interaction (HCI) and Design Research Papers
  • The article provides a guide to publishing in Human-Computer Interaction (HCI) and design research, sharing insights from the author’s PhD experience.
  • It explains the significance of publishing in academia and industry, offering an overview of peer-reviewed journals and conferences.
  • It breaks down the two main types of papers — review and empirical — detailing their structures and acceptance criteria.
  • The piece emphasizes strategic research planning, collaboration, and selecting the right venue for submission.
  • The piece also outlines practical steps for writing, revising, and handling rejections, encouraging persistence and learning from reviewer feedback to improve publication success.
Share:A Guide to Publishing Human-Computer Interaction (HCI) and Design Research Papers
8 min read

Join the UX Magazine community!

Stay informed with exclusive content on the intersection of UX, AI agents, and agentic automation—essential reading for future-focused professionals.

Hello!

You're officially a member of the UX Magazine Community.
We're excited to have you with us!

Thank you!

To begin viewing member content, please verify your email.

Tell us about you. Enroll in the course.

    This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Check our privacy policy and