Flag

We stand with Ukraine and our team members from Ukraine. Here are ways you can help

Get exclusive access to thought-provoking articles, bonus podcast content, and cutting-edge whitepapers. Become a member of the UX Magazine community today!

Home ›› Business Value and ROI ›› 6 Key Questions to Guide International UX Research ›› Trust in Experience Design

Trust in Experience Design

by Chad Vavra
3 min read
Share this post on
Tweet
Share
Post
Share
Email
Print

Save

Trust is the “good” in good experience design—are you making sure your product is trustworthy?

So much is currently being said about designing successful user experiences that it’s easy to get lost trying to find the right experience design solution for your project. Should you choose to follow a lean process? Do you need a robust discovery phase, or will that underwhelm the client with what they already know? Should you design for mobile first or go responsive?

There are many ways to approach UX, and it’s easy to understand why there are so many principles and tools when you consider that “experience” is an all-encompassing notion when it comes to modern product design. Unsurprisingly, you could stock an entire bookstore with titles applied to “good UX.”

While it’s great that this much information exists—the profession and the world benefit from an open dialog and greater sharing on the subject—before you get lost in the weeds, I’d like to let you in on a secret I realized over the course of 20 years of product, client, and agency work.

“Do you trust it?”

This all you really need to know to design great human experiences.

That seems too easy, right? Technically it is too simplistic. We still need managers, designers, strategists, researchers, and everyone else that typically gets involved in designing a product. And the fact remains, we need something to ask the “trust question” against. But if that something already exists it becomes easy to ask yourself: “Do I trust it?”

Trust is a very powerful utility in user experience, as it’s part of our “system one” brain. This means it’s on par with the fight-or-flight instinct. We constantly judge trust without trying to or acknowledging that we’re doing it. Trust requires almost no cognitive load, no distraction, no delay. When we don’t trust something, however, we pause what we’re doing or thinking and our brain shifts to “system two,” which then has to investigate further and decide what to do.

“Do I trust this?”

“No. Alright, then what should I do now?”

Think about word association exercises: if you trust them you can discover some really enlightening things about how you feel on a specific topic. If you don’t trust the exercise, your responses take longer and you end up weighing your options, wondering if you said the right thing. You’re trying to fix your answer to create the trust you’re lacking.

Simply put, trust is the “good” in good experience design. Good experiences are ones that don’t distract us from the flow, and flow happens when we aren’t questioning if we should trust what we’re seeing, hearing, or doing.

Simply put, trust is the “good” in good experience design

Don’t be fooled though, trust as a high-level function might naturally seem to only apply to high-level questions like the branding of a product, but it can also be applied to fine detail, like the name of a button or the color of a typeface. And that is the tricky part of trust. At every step of design, from discovery to deployment, you have to check the level of trust by asking yourself these kinds of questions:

  • Do you trust the market research, or do the users just want a faster horse?
  • Do you trust your stakeholders, or are they worried more about losing their job than the quality that will come from taking a risk?
  • Will users trust the first screen enough to create an account, or will creating one set the impossible expectation that your experience will magically win their trust later?
  • Are the error messages on the forms trustworthy? Is the typeface? Is the color?
  • Does the page load fast enough? Will you trust that it hasn’t frozen or crashed?
  • If you click a link do you trust where you’ll end up? Do you even know where you are in the product?
  • Eventually we all need help. Do you trust what is offered?
  • Before being asked for feedback or an email, ask yourself, do you trust that it will matter? If the answer is no, the relationship could be permanently damaged.

The list goes on and on, but in the context of this article only one question remains: Do you trust me?

Illustration of rock climber courtesy of Shutterstock.

post authorChad Vavra

Chad Vavra

Chad Vavra is a Director of User Experience at Rosetta. Chad's 15 years of experience in digital media spans design, development, strategy, and operations across a variety of industry verticals which benefits his ability to design holistic digital solutions.

Tweet
Share
Post
Share
Email
Print

Related Articles

AI can create wireframes, synthesize research, and draft copy fast. What it can’t do: understand your users, carry context, or be accountable when something goes wrong. That’s still you.

Article by Tushar Deshmukh
AI Is Your New Intern, Not Your Replacement
  • AI is not replacing UX pros; it’s automating repetitive tasks and augmenting human capabilities.
  • Think of AI as an intern: quick, smart, but dependent on human direction, context, and judgment.
  • Human skills like empathy, research, systems thinking, and ethical decision-making are more important than ever.
  • The future belongs to designers who incorporate AI to accelerate execution and devote more time to strategic, human-centered work.
Share:AI Is Your New Intern, Not Your Replacement
20 min read

Another lesson from studying UX with Laura Klein.

Article by Paivi Salminen
The Agile Trap Designers Fall into: Feeding the Beast
  • Agile teams are fast, but designers get stuck in an infinite loop of visual work: redesigning the same components over and over instead of solving real UX problems.
  • Design systems break that cycle, defining the building blocks once, freeing designers to focus on how the product works, not how it looks.
  • When the basics are in place, teams can start working together sooner, prototype faster, and release incremental features without the interface falling apart.
Share:The Agile Trap Designers Fall into: Feeding the Beast
4 min read

Real engagement is about designing experiences that people want to have. Here are some things that games do well that most apps don’t.

Article by Montgomery Singman
Gamification 2.0. Beyond Points and Badges: Designing for Players, Not Metrics. Conclusion
  • Most apps use gamification as a manipulation layer to drive metrics, but people engage with things that are truly worthy of their time, not points or streak guilt.
  • Apps that people stick with do this by designing for intrinsic motivation, making the experience itself rewarding.
  • The true measure of success is whether users feel more capable, accomplished, and enriched for having used your app.
Share:Gamification 2.0. Beyond Points and Badges: Designing for Players, Not Metrics. Conclusion
8 min read

Join the UX Magazine community!

Stay informed with exclusive content on the intersection of UX, AI agents, and agentic automation—essential reading for future-focused professionals.

Hello!

You're officially a member of the UX Magazine Community.
We're excited to have you with us!

Thank you!

To begin viewing member content, please verify your email.

Get Paid to Test AI Products

Earn an average of $100 per test by reviewing AI-first product experiences and sharing your feedback.

    Tell us about you. Enroll in the course.

      This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Check our privacy policy and