Flag

We stand with Ukraine and our team members from Ukraine. Here are ways you can help

Get exclusive access to thought-provoking articles, bonus podcast content, and cutting-edge whitepapers. Become a member of the UX Magazine community today!

Home ›› Business Value and ROI ›› 6 Key Questions to Guide International UX Research ›› Trust in Experience Design

Trust in Experience Design

by Chad Vavra
3 min read
Share this post on
Tweet
Share
Post
Share
Email
Print

Save

Trust is the “good” in good experience design—are you making sure your product is trustworthy?

So much is currently being said about designing successful user experiences that it’s easy to get lost trying to find the right experience design solution for your project. Should you choose to follow a lean process? Do you need a robust discovery phase, or will that underwhelm the client with what they already know? Should you design for mobile first or go responsive?

There are many ways to approach UX, and it’s easy to understand why there are so many principles and tools when you consider that “experience” is an all-encompassing notion when it comes to modern product design. Unsurprisingly, you could stock an entire bookstore with titles applied to “good UX.”

While it’s great that this much information exists—the profession and the world benefit from an open dialog and greater sharing on the subject—before you get lost in the weeds, I’d like to let you in on a secret I realized over the course of 20 years of product, client, and agency work.

“Do you trust it?”

This all you really need to know to design great human experiences.

That seems too easy, right? Technically it is too simplistic. We still need managers, designers, strategists, researchers, and everyone else that typically gets involved in designing a product. And the fact remains, we need something to ask the “trust question” against. But if that something already exists it becomes easy to ask yourself: “Do I trust it?”

Trust is a very powerful utility in user experience, as it’s part of our “system one” brain. This means it’s on par with the fight-or-flight instinct. We constantly judge trust without trying to or acknowledging that we’re doing it. Trust requires almost no cognitive load, no distraction, no delay. When we don’t trust something, however, we pause what we’re doing or thinking and our brain shifts to “system two,” which then has to investigate further and decide what to do.

“Do I trust this?”

“No. Alright, then what should I do now?”

Think about word association exercises: if you trust them you can discover some really enlightening things about how you feel on a specific topic. If you don’t trust the exercise, your responses take longer and you end up weighing your options, wondering if you said the right thing. You’re trying to fix your answer to create the trust you’re lacking.

Simply put, trust is the “good” in good experience design. Good experiences are ones that don’t distract us from the flow, and flow happens when we aren’t questioning if we should trust what we’re seeing, hearing, or doing.

Simply put, trust is the “good” in good experience design

Don’t be fooled though, trust as a high-level function might naturally seem to only apply to high-level questions like the branding of a product, but it can also be applied to fine detail, like the name of a button or the color of a typeface. And that is the tricky part of trust. At every step of design, from discovery to deployment, you have to check the level of trust by asking yourself these kinds of questions:

  • Do you trust the market research, or do the users just want a faster horse?
  • Do you trust your stakeholders, or are they worried more about losing their job than the quality that will come from taking a risk?
  • Will users trust the first screen enough to create an account, or will creating one set the impossible expectation that your experience will magically win their trust later?
  • Are the error messages on the forms trustworthy? Is the typeface? Is the color?
  • Does the page load fast enough? Will you trust that it hasn’t frozen or crashed?
  • If you click a link do you trust where you’ll end up? Do you even know where you are in the product?
  • Eventually we all need help. Do you trust what is offered?
  • Before being asked for feedback or an email, ask yourself, do you trust that it will matter? If the answer is no, the relationship could be permanently damaged.

The list goes on and on, but in the context of this article only one question remains: Do you trust me?

Illustration of rock climber courtesy of Shutterstock.

post authorChad Vavra

Chad Vavra

Chad Vavra is a Director of User Experience at Rosetta. Chad's 15 years of experience in digital media spans design, development, strategy, and operations across a variety of industry verticals which benefits his ability to design holistic digital solutions.

Tweet
Share
Post
Share
Email
Print

Related Articles

Discover how human-centered UX design is transforming medtech by cutting costs, reducing errors, and driving better outcomes for clinicians, patients, and healthcare providers alike.

Article by Dennis Lenard
How UX Design is Revolutionising Medtech Cost Efficiency
  • The article explains how strategic UX design in medtech improves cost efficiency by enhancing usability, reducing training time, and minimizing user errors across clinical workflows.
  • The piece argues that intuitive, user-centered interfaces boost productivity, adoption rates, and patient outcomes while lowering support costs and extending product lifecycles, making UX a crucial investment for sustainable growth and ROI in healthcare technology.
Share:How UX Design is Revolutionising Medtech Cost Efficiency
7 min read

Discover how the future of AI runs on purpose-built infrastructure.

Article by UX Magazine Staff
AI Agent Runtimes in Dedicated Lanes: Lessons from China’s EV Roads
  • The article states that AI’s progress depends less on creating larger models and more on developing specialized “lanes” (agent runtimes) where AI can run safely and efficiently.
  • It argues that, like China’s EV-only highways, these runtimes are designed for smooth flow, constant energy (through memory and context), and safe, reliable operation, much like EV-only highways in China.
  • The piece concludes that building this kind of infrastructure takes effort and oversight, but it enables AI systems to work together, grow, and improve sustainably.
Share:AI Agent Runtimes in Dedicated Lanes: Lessons from China’s EV Roads
4 min read

Learn when to talk to users, and when to watch them in order to uncover real insights and design experiences that truly work.

Article by Paivi Salminen
Usability Tests vs. Focus Groups
  • The article distinguishes between usability tests and focus groups, highlighting their different roles in UX research.
  • It explains that focus groups gather opinions and attitudes, while usability tests observe real user behavior to find design issues.
  • The piece stresses using each method at the right stage to build the right product and ensure a better user experience.
Share:Usability Tests vs. Focus Groups
2 min read

Join the UX Magazine community!

Stay informed with exclusive content on the intersection of UX, AI agents, and agentic automation—essential reading for future-focused professionals.

Hello!

You're officially a member of the UX Magazine Community.
We're excited to have you with us!

Thank you!

To begin viewing member content, please verify your email.

Get Paid to Test AI Products

Earn an average of $100 per test by reviewing AI-first product experiences and sharing your feedback.

    Tell us about you. Enroll in the course.

      This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Check our privacy policy and