Flag

We stand with Ukraine and our team members from Ukraine. Here are ways you can help

Home ›› Analytics and Tracking ›› Five UX Insights about Uber and the Ridesharing Economy

Five UX Insights about Uber and the Ridesharing Economy

by Jennifer McCormick
3 min read
Share this post on
Tweet
Share
Post
Share
Email
Print

Save

Some key experience design insights into the sharing economy gleaned from a ride-along study of Uber users in San Francisco.

I like Uber … a lot.

So naturally, I decided to do what any user experience researcher worth her salt would and conducted a ride-along study with Uber customers in San Francisco as they took their Uber rides across town, collecting data using a notepad and video camera.

Although my sample size was small (five riders of both genders), a few patterns of presented themselves quite clearly. Here is what I found:

1. Uber Customers Don’t Only Use Uber

Although the participants weren’t recruited based on their current ride services and preferences, all indicated that they also use other ride sharing and transportation services such as Lyft, Sidecar, and regular old taxis. Transportation service customers have many choices, and as a result they select from among the various services, based on the type of experience they wish to have. Creating and delivering a well-defined user experience and brand is a real advantage for Uber.

2. People Choose Uber When They Want To Keep To Themselves

Lyft and the more sharing-oriented services can carry an expectation of socializing with the driver and others during the ride. This can be nice, but it’s not for everyone all of the time. A couple of participants indicated that they prefer to use Uber over other services when they want to maintain a professional demeanor during a ride, or just keep to themselves and not feel the pressure to be social. This feeling of separation and privacy was especially important to my female participants.

Many prefer @Uber over other services when they want to maintain a professional demeanor

One female rider, T.G., articulated this need succinctly: “I actually don’t want to interact with the drivers. [Uber] is a bit more professional. I can just get in the car get on my phone and no one is bothering me.”

3. The Exact Point Of Pick Up Is Unknown

This can create confusion, and in some cases, missed rides. Four out of five participants experienced a lack of information about the exact point of pick up (which side of the street, for example) or worse, misinformation due to inexact GPS data. It’s difficult and dangerous to try to call or text the driver at the moment of pick up, because well, he is trying to drive (and park)!

4. Directions Are Frequently Negotiated during the Ride

This seems like an obvious takeaway because the driver wants to give excellent service and please the rider, and naturally the rider wants to get to her specific destination quickly. But let’s consider the unique and overall experience of the service here, especially given insight #2. I can’t think of anyone better positioned than Uber to leverage innovative technology and harness the power of “The Knowledge” in the form of data, to create a truly differentiated user experience that minimizes the amount of hashing out directions during the ride.

5. The App Is Clear and Easy to Use Overall

The ride-along participants all rated the app 5.5 or higher in overall ease of use (out of a possible 7). Those are great ratings; especially considering that two out of the five participants had just used the service for the first time during the study. I observed very few errors when users interacted with the app, but did hear some questions and concerns about the lack of information available to them when they needed it: especially around surge pricing and price estimates.

Take Us to the Customer-Centric Future, Uber

There’s no question that services like Uber and Lyft are starting to transform how we interact with our cities and with each other and, ultimately, how we go about our lives. I plan to keep a close and interested eye on how Uber—specifically, as a category leader—integrates feedback from their users and drivers to improve and evolve their customer experience going forward.

 

post authorJennifer McCormick

Jennifer McCormick
This user does not have bio yet.

Tweet
Share
Post
Share
Email
Print

Related Articles

Discover how Flux.1, with its groundbreaking 12 billion parameters, sets a new benchmark in AI image generation. This article explores its advancements over Midjourney and Dall-E 3, showcasing its unmatched detail and prompt accuracy. Don’t miss out on seeing how this latest model redefines what’s possible in digital artistry!

Article by Jim Clyde Monge
Flux.1 is a Mind-Blowing Open-Weights AI Image Generator with 12B Parameters
  • This article examines Flux.1’s 12 billion parameters and its advancements over Midjourney and Dall-E 3. Highlights its superior image detail and prompt adherence.
  • The piece explores the shift of developers from Stability AI to Black Forest Labs and how this led to Flux.1. Analyzes the innovation impact.
  • It compares Flux.1 with Midjourney V6, Dall-E 3, and SD3 Ultra, focusing on visual quality, prompt coherence, and diversity.
  • The guide explains how to access Flux.1 via Replicate, HuggingFace, and Fal. Covers the different models—Pro, Dev, Schnell—and their uses.
  • The article investigates Flux.1’s capabilities in generating photorealistic and artistic images with examples of its realism and detailed rendering.
Share:Flux.1 is a Mind-Blowing Open-Weights AI Image Generator with 12B Parameters
5 min read

Is true consciousness in computers a possibility, or merely a fantasy? The article delves into the philosophical and scientific debates surrounding the nature of consciousness and its potential in AI. Explore why modern neuroscience and AI fall short of creating genuine awareness, the limits of current technology, and the profound philosophical questions that challenge our understanding of mind and machine. Discover why the pursuit of conscious machines might be more about myth than reality.

Article by Peter D'Autry
Why Computers Can’t Be Conscious
  • The article examines why computers, despite advancements, cannot achieve consciousness like humans. It challenges the assumption that mimicking human behavior equates to genuine consciousness.
  • It critiques the reductionist approach of equating neural activity with consciousness and argues that the “hard problem” of consciousness remains unsolved. The piece also discusses the limitations of both neuroscience and AI in addressing this problem.
  • The article disputes the notion that increasing complexity in AI will lead to consciousness, highlighting that understanding and experience cannot be solely derived from computational processes.
  • It emphasizes the importance of physical interaction and the lived experience in consciousness, arguing that AI lacks the embodied context necessary for genuine understanding and consciousness.
Share:Why Computers Can’t Be Conscious
18 min read

AI is transforming financial inclusion for rural entrepreneurs by analyzing alternative data and automating community lending. Learn how these advancements open new doors for the unbanked and empower local businesses.

Article by Thasya Ingriany
AI for the Unbanked: How Technology Can Empower Rural Entrepreneurs
  • The article explores how AI can enhance financial systems for the unbanked by using alternative data to create accessible, user-friendly credit profiles for rural entrepreneurs.
  • It analyzes how AI can automate group lending practices, improve financial inclusion, and support rural entrepreneurs by strengthening community-driven financial networks like “gotong royong”.
Share:AI for the Unbanked: How Technology Can Empower Rural Entrepreneurs
5 min read

Tell us about you. Enroll in the course.

    This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Check our privacy policy and