We stand with Ukraine and our team members from Ukraine. Here are ways you can help

Home ›› Analytics and Tracking ›› Five UX Insights about Uber and the Ridesharing Economy

Five UX Insights about Uber and the Ridesharing Economy

by Jennifer McCormick
3 min read
Share this post on


Some key experience design insights into the sharing economy gleaned from a ride-along study of Uber users in San Francisco.

I like Uber … a lot.

So naturally, I decided to do what any user experience researcher worth her salt would and conducted a ride-along study with Uber customers in San Francisco as they took their Uber rides across town, collecting data using a notepad and video camera.

Although my sample size was small (five riders of both genders), a few patterns of presented themselves quite clearly. Here is what I found:

1. Uber Customers Don’t Only Use Uber

Although the participants weren’t recruited based on their current ride services and preferences, all indicated that they also use other ride sharing and transportation services such as Lyft, Sidecar, and regular old taxis. Transportation service customers have many choices, and as a result they select from among the various services, based on the type of experience they wish to have. Creating and delivering a well-defined user experience and brand is a real advantage for Uber.

2. People Choose Uber When They Want To Keep To Themselves

Lyft and the more sharing-oriented services can carry an expectation of socializing with the driver and others during the ride. This can be nice, but it’s not for everyone all of the time. A couple of participants indicated that they prefer to use Uber over other services when they want to maintain a professional demeanor during a ride, or just keep to themselves and not feel the pressure to be social. This feeling of separation and privacy was especially important to my female participants.

Many prefer @Uber over other services when they want to maintain a professional demeanor

One female rider, T.G., articulated this need succinctly: “I actually don’t want to interact with the drivers. [Uber] is a bit more professional. I can just get in the car get on my phone and no one is bothering me.”

3. The Exact Point Of Pick Up Is Unknown

This can create confusion, and in some cases, missed rides. Four out of five participants experienced a lack of information about the exact point of pick up (which side of the street, for example) or worse, misinformation due to inexact GPS data. It’s difficult and dangerous to try to call or text the driver at the moment of pick up, because well, he is trying to drive (and park)!

4. Directions Are Frequently Negotiated during the Ride

This seems like an obvious takeaway because the driver wants to give excellent service and please the rider, and naturally the rider wants to get to her specific destination quickly. But let’s consider the unique and overall experience of the service here, especially given insight #2. I can’t think of anyone better positioned than Uber to leverage innovative technology and harness the power of “The Knowledge” in the form of data, to create a truly differentiated user experience that minimizes the amount of hashing out directions during the ride.

5. The App Is Clear and Easy to Use Overall

The ride-along participants all rated the app 5.5 or higher in overall ease of use (out of a possible 7). Those are great ratings; especially considering that two out of the five participants had just used the service for the first time during the study. I observed very few errors when users interacted with the app, but did hear some questions and concerns about the lack of information available to them when they needed it: especially around surge pricing and price estimates.

Take Us to the Customer-Centric Future, Uber

There’s no question that services like Uber and Lyft are starting to transform how we interact with our cities and with each other and, ultimately, how we go about our lives. I plan to keep a close and interested eye on how Uber—specifically, as a category leader—integrates feedback from their users and drivers to improve and evolve their customer experience going forward.


post authorJennifer McCormick

Jennifer McCormick, This user does not have bio yet.


Related Articles

Generating AI images in multiple languages leads to different results.

Article by Yennie Jun
Lost in DALL-E 3 Translation
  • The article critically examines OpenAI’s DALL-E 3, the latest in AI image generation.
  • The author sheds light on the model’s prompt transformations, revealing language-specific variations, and biases, and a nuanced exploration of how this technology navigates issues of diversity and transparency.

Share:Lost in DALL-E 3 Translation
11 min read

Use generative-AI tools to support and enhance your UX skills — not to replace them. Start with small UX tasks and watch out for hallucinations and bad advice.

Article by Kate Moran
AI for UX: Getting Started
  • The article delves into the urgent need for UX professionals to embrace AI, outlining tools, applications, and considerations.
  • The authors emphasize:
    • starting small;
    • gaining hands-on experience;
    • the symbiotic relationship between AI and human judgment in enhancing user experiences.

Share:AI for UX: Getting Started
16 min read

Why does everything look the same?

Article by Michael F. Buckley
Media Overload is Causing Design “Generification”
  • The article explores the impact of streaming media on contemporary design, arguing that the proliferation of personalized content has eroded a shared cultural experience, contributing to a perceived decline in design originality and character.
Share:Media Overload is Causing Design “Generification”
4 min read

Did you know UX Magazine hosts the most popular podcast about conversational AI?

Listen to Invisible Machines

This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Check our privacy policy and