Flag

We stand with Ukraine and our team members from Ukraine. Here are ways you can help

Get exclusive access to thought-provoking articles, bonus podcast content, and cutting-edge whitepapers. Become a member of the UX Magazine community today!

Home ›› Business Value and ROI ›› Questioning the Television Experience in the Age of Snapchat

Questioning the Television Experience in the Age of Snapchat

by Dallas Sargent
3 min read
Share this post on
Tweet
Share
Post
Share
Email
Print

Save

cyclicat-television-hero

In an age when we’ve got more content than we know what to do with and we can access it whenever we want to, what makes the television experience relevant?

TV isn’t what it used to be. Once the cornerstone glowing screen in households around the world, television sets now jockey for attention with tablets, smartphones, desktop computers, and even some refrigerators.

The television experience of yore—flipping through the channels and settling on whatever is reasonably entertaining, or tuning in at a specific time to watch your favorite show—has almost faded completely. Now we DVR our programs of choice, or binge watch them through our preferred streaming service. In a race to keep fresh content rolling out, odds are that service has added “production house” to its repertoire.

These are truly strange and glorious days for content providers and consumers alike. Forty years ago, if you wanted to watch the Super Bowl or the Academy Awards, you had to tune in at a specific time. Things changed in the late ‘70s when VCR technology entered the mainstream (though programming a VCR was confusing enough that you often felt the need to hit record yourself when the program began). This set the stage for the on-demand nature of current media consumption, but what we see now is a pulsating smorgasbord of video content.

The basic nature of what television is now can be articulated in wildly divergent ways, making it impossible to pinpoint what trends will win out as our mechanisms and habits for consumption continue to change. But it’s been interesting to watch one aspect of the old-fashioned way of experiencing television come back into fashion: content as a one-time, don’t-miss-it event.

Snapchat’s Live Stories feature creates a curated stream of user submitted Snaps from various locations and events. According to a recap of the MTV Video Music Awards in Digiay, “A full 12 million people watched the Live Story from the event, according to sources. The Snapchat audience technically exceeded the actual ratings of the broadcast and shows why networks and brands are supporting these alternative viewing options.” Meanwhile, Snapchat’s Discover feature competes with providers like YouTube by offering content curated by actual media professionals.

BBC LIVE gives users digital companion experiences across devices

“What we have seen so far, with the new feature Discover, is relatively old-fashioned,” writes Matthew Ingram in a recent Gigaom article. “Instead of just having a bunch of user-generated content and then some native advertising mixed in, the way Twitter and Facebook do, Snapchat offers a selection of content created by a handful of media partners like CNN and Vice.”

Newcomers are not the only game in town when it comes to evolved modes of content consumption. BBC recently launched the new LIVE digital service to coincide with their coverage of the Sochi 2014 Winter Olympics. Winner of Design for Experience awards in both the Forward-Looking Experience and Digital Media and Entertainment categories, BBC LIVE gives users digital companion experiences across devices, allowing them to watch live multiple video streams, including online exclusive alternate views. Users can also watch for video cue points of key moments, review highlight clips, and read running “live text” commentary and add their own thoughts.

While BBC LIVE is a comprehensive way for a content provider to create a proprietary branded experience that works across almost every screen in the house (sorry fridge), is also has the potential of brining these disparate devices together into a shared experience. The reality for now seems to be that media brands and social networking services will need to work in concert to keep users tuned into whatever our idea of television is.

As Todd Spangler pointed out in a recent Variety article, “Media companies, ogling Snapchat’s 100 million-plus user base that skews toward the 18-24 set, are flocking to it—because of the here-today-gone-tomorrow approach, not in spite of it.”

Spangler highlights Stephen Colbert’s use of the service to hype the debut of his new late show on CBS, and the host of big players producing original content for the platform (from Major League Baseball to Comedy Central to Vice).

“None of this, however, is to say Snapchat has a fundamentally superior model that’s going to put the likes of YouTube out of business,” Spangler says. “Snapchat, as it exists today, is totally unsuitable for Netflix-style binge-watching of long-form entertainment.”

So what is the television experience? It’s whatever you want it to be. Of course getting whatever you want whenever you want it isn’t super satisfying when we haven’t figured out exactly what we want.

Image of old television in the grass courtesy Shutterstock.

post authorDallas Sargent

Dallas Sargent
Dallas is the Program Manager at Design for Experience. He digs words.

Tweet
Share
Post
Share
Email
Print

Related Articles

Learn why your badges and streaks won’t wow kids raised on Minecraft.

Article by Montgomery Singman
Gamification 2.0. Beyond Points and Badges: Designing for Players, Not Metrics. Chapter 4: Special Considerations
  • The piece explains that young users, trained by thousands of hours of expert game design, can smell fake gamification at a hundred paces.
Share:Gamification 2.0. Beyond Points and Badges: Designing for Players, Not Metrics. Chapter 4: Special Considerations
4 min read

Learn about the most difficult challenge for designers in Agile.

Article by Paivi Salminen
The Part of Agile Designers Fear the Most: Imperfect Work
  • The article argues that designers aren’t afraid of shipping imperfect work; they’re afraid of imperfect work remaining imperfect because teams tend not to come back to improve what they’ve already shipped.
Share:The Part of Agile Designers Fear the Most: Imperfect Work
4 min read

Find out why slapping gamification on your product without first selecting a genre is the silent killer of your engagement strategy.

Article by Montgomery Singman
Gamification 2.0. Beyond Points and Badges: Designing for Players, Not Metrics. Chapter 3: The Framework
  • The article argues that “adding gamification” without selecting a genre is akin to “adding music” without referencing jazz or heavy metal: a category error that most product teams never realize they’re making.
  • It contends that different game genres are not just aesthetic choices; they are fundamentally different motivational architectures, and mapping your product to the wrong one is why most gamification fails.
Share:Gamification 2.0. Beyond Points and Badges: Designing for Players, Not Metrics. Chapter 3: The Framework
19 min read

Join the UX Magazine community!

Stay informed with exclusive content on the intersection of UX, AI agents, and agentic automation—essential reading for future-focused professionals.

Hello!

You're officially a member of the UX Magazine Community.
We're excited to have you with us!

Thank you!

To begin viewing member content, please verify your email.

Get Paid to Test AI Products

Earn an average of $100 per test by reviewing AI-first product experiences and sharing your feedback.

    Tell us about you. Enroll in the course.

      This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Check our privacy policy and