Flag

We stand with Ukraine and our team members from Ukraine. Here are ways you can help

Get exclusive access to thought-provoking articles, bonus podcast content, and cutting-edge whitepapers. Become a member of the UX Magazine community today!

Home ›› What Happened to My Radio App?

What Happened to My Radio App?

by Shay Ben-Barak
4 min read
Share this post on
Tweet
Share
Post
Share
Email
Print

Save

A review of the newest version of the live-radio listening mobile app TuneIn finds some frustrating usability issues—especially for longtime users.

I use TuneIn to listen to local radio stations on my Android smartphone when I’m on the go or exercising, scenarios I presume are typical for many other users. All I want is to open the app and choose one of my favorite local radio station—it’s as simple as that, but let me put it into a formal workflow diagram.

 

TuneIn workflow

This is, of course, the daily scenario after a user has already chosen his or her favorite stations in a longer but infrequent process, which I’ll comment on later.

Note that in this daily scenario there are two major cognitive steps:

  1. Users want to listen to the radio and so they launch the radio app
  2. They select the station they want to listen to from their favorite stations.

In the old TuneIn (I was previously running version 11.3) the app opened on the “Browse” tab, and I had to select the “Favorites” tab and then select a station; one gratuitous step, but nothing too grueling.

TuneIn screengrab

A tap on the favorite station and would start buffering and then playing, while the screen displayed the station’s information.

Opening TuneIn after updating to version 12, however, I was confused. Where the f%@& were my favorites? Let’s see: “browse” and “explore” were not reasonable choices, so I tried “home”—which took me to a constantly updating screen with a mixture of suggested radio stations and songs that are playing now in stations.

This felt nothing like home, where I expect things to feel familiar or at least predictable. Eventually, I found my old favorites under the “My Profile” screen in the “Following” section (see the screenshot). So, according to TuneIn, I’m not a radio listener anymore, but a follower of stations and shows, and guess what—I can be followed as well.

TuneIn screengrab

Finally, I could tap one of my favorite stations and get it playing.

The next time I launched the app, it remembered which of the four “main” screens I was on previously, as well as the last station played, so if you usually use, say, the “following” section, it comes right up. Still, you have to choose your station (second tap; launching the app is the first) and tap the play button (third tap), which becomes gratuitous.

TuneIn users are not followers, they are listeners, and their “real life” metaphor is radio

So what’s not working with version 12? Let’s recap:

  • My initial encounter with version 12 of TuneIn was really confusing, especially as I was accustomed to the older version—not a smooth migration!
  • The location of My Profile as the last out of four items was confusing. Also, the term “my profile” implies settings controls—like username, email address, or profile picture—and not the most frequently used screen (at least in the long run) where my favorite stations are located.
  • Using the social networks’ terminology of “following” and “followers” is not a good idea. TuneIn users are not followers, they are listeners, and their “real life” metaphor is radio or television which use (for good reasons) the term “favorites.” Also, most of the radio listeners won’t expect to have any followers. I don’t see why TuneIn should try to be a social network, when it’s obviously not one.
  • Tapping a station on the favorites (or “following”) screen means that the user wants to play it. Don’t make me tap again; it’s annoying.
  • The “home” screen is actually a kind of exploration arena, as it displays suggested stations and currently playing songs (that leads to the relevant stations) and it gets updated dynamically. In addition to that, there are two more exploration arenas: “Browse”, where stations are ordered according to subjects, locations and languages; and “Explore” with subject, yet again, but the display is more visual and the navigation is bidirectional—scroll and swipe—thus, quite complex. Having three exploration arenas is too much and I suspect it reflects design indecision rather than a robust concept that can leads the user to the right place.
  • Navigation—the fact the you treat any of the four screens (“Home,” “Browse,” “Explore,” and “My Profile”) as a main screen, leads to counterintuitive phenomenon for Android users. When the app is on any of these main screens, tapping the native <back> button of the Android systems, closes the app. The user expects that to happen only on the main screen of an app, i.e. on one screen of the app and not on four of them. In other cases the <back> button should take the user to the previous screen, of course.
  • If you want the user to use the app functionality to discover new content, don’t use the side drawer design pattern. (Here is why.)

Have you tried to new version of TuneIn? Please share your thoughts and experiences below.

post authorShay Ben-Barak

Shay Ben-Barak
Shay Ben-Barak (@ShayUXD) is a freelance experience strategist and senior usability expert. For the last 15 years he is leading projects from the early inventive stages of understanding the users' needs, throughout the process of concept design, to the detailed interaction design and visual design. He is experienced with mobile devices, legacy applications and web applications, and he was involved with development of consumers apps as well as complex systems (e.g. financial, medical, ERP and C4I systems) for professionals. Shay is also a UX mentor at the Google Campus TLV which is a pro bono publico activity of mentoring startups and entrepreneurs in their initial steps towards their very first UX prototype. Shay owns a master's degree (M.Sc.) in cognitive science from the Technion and his master thesis about Mental Models was published in chapter 5 in this book.

Tweet
Share
Post
Share
Email
Print

Related Articles

The role of the Head of Design is transforming. Dive into how modern design leaders amplify impact, foster innovation, and shape strategic culture, redefining what it means to lead design today.

Article by Darren Smith
Head of Design is Dead, Long Live the Head of Design!
  • The article examines the evolving role of the Head of Design, highlighting shifts in expectations, responsibilities, and leadership impact within design teams.
  • It discusses how design leaders amplify team performance, foster innovation, and align design initiatives with broader business goals, especially under changing demands in leadership roles.
  • The piece emphasizes the critical value of design leadership as a multiplier for organizational success, offering insights into the unique contributions that design leaders bring to strategy, culture, and team cohesion.
Share:Head of Design is Dead, Long Live the Head of Design!
9 min read

Discover how digital twins are transforming industries by enabling innovation and reducing waste. This article delves into the power of digital twins to create virtual replicas, allowing companies to improve products, processes, and sustainability efforts before physical resources are used. Read on to see how this cutting-edge technology helps streamline operations and drive smarter, eco-friendly decisions

Article by Alla Slesarenko
How Digital Twins Drive Innovation and Minimize Waste
  • The article explores how digital twins—virtual models of physical objects—enable organizations to drive innovation by allowing testing and improvements before physical implementation.
  • It discusses how digital twins can minimize waste and increase efficiency by identifying potential issues early, ultimately optimizing resource use.
  • The piece emphasizes the role of digital twins in various sectors, showcasing their capacity to improve processes, product development, and sustainability initiatives.
Share:How Digital Twins Drive Innovation and Minimize Waste
5 min read

Is banning AI in education a solution or a missed opportunity? This thought-provoking piece dives into how outdated assessment methods may be fueling academic dishonesty — and why embracing AI could transform learning for the better.

Article by Enrique Dans
On the Question of Cheating and Dishonesty in Education in the Age of AI
  • The article challenges the view that cheating is solely a student issue, suggesting assessment reform to address deeper causes of dishonesty.
  • It advocates for evaluating AI use in education instead of banning it, encouraging responsible use to boost learning.
  • The piece critiques GPA as a limiting metric, proposing more meaningful ways to assess student capabilities.
  • The article calls for updated ethics that reward effective AI use instead of punishing adaptation.
  • It envisions AI as a transformative tool to modernize and enhance learning practices.
Share:On the Question of Cheating and Dishonesty in Education in the Age of AI
4 min read

Join the UX Magazine community!

Stay informed with exclusive content on the intersection of UX, AI agents, and agentic automation—essential reading for future-focused professionals.

Hello!

You're officially a member of the UX Magazine Community.
We're excited to have you with us!

Thank you!

To begin viewing member content, please verify your email.

Tell us about you. Enroll in the course.

    This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Check our privacy policy and