We stand with Ukraine and our team members from Ukraine.

A Community Of Over 740,000

Home ›› Business Value and ROI ›› 6 Key Questions to Guide International UX Research ›› 4 Reasons Your UX Investment Isn’t Paying Off

4 Reasons Your UX Investment Isn’t Paying Off

by Hilary Little
5 min read
Share this post on


Successful user experience efforts require more than just investment—they also need proper implementation.

“Every dollar spent on UX brings in between $2 and $100 dollars in return.”

We all know the business case for doing user experience work: investing upfront in making products easy to use really pays off. It reduces project risk, cost, and time while improving, efficiency, effectiveness, and end user satisfaction.

(Don’t know the business case? Read this or this. Or this.) But what if you’re investing in UX and not getting results?

There can be many factors behind an under-performing user experience effort. Anything from a lack of tools to the zombie apocalypse can wreak havoc on your teams. Addressing either of those factors are outside my area of expertise.

Here’s where I do know what I’m talking about. First, rule out the obvious: your UX folks are jerks, they don’t communicate well, they don’t understand business, they aren’t team players, they have such terrible body odor people stay 10 feet away …

Next, look at your organization. I’ve based the following list on observations accumulated over my years as a UX professional. These are some common organizational “behavior” patterns that can make even the best UX efforts ineffective.

1. You Hired the Wrong People.

User experience design is getting a lot of attention lately and UX is a buzzword many want to add to their resumes. But the field has been around for several years (although under different names) and is fairly mature. Until a person has done full-time UX work—not as an aspect of their job, but as their job—for at least two or three years, they are generally not at a professional level.

How to spot a UX pro:

  • He displays a high level of empathy, excellent communication skills, and lots of curiosity.
  • She doesn’t design based on personal preference or opinion, and will try to make sure you don’t either. She bases her design decisions on user research, heuristics, test data, and UI design patterns.
  • He is not attached to his designs. In fact, he starts with sketches and wireframes and happily crumples up multiple iterations before progressing to a detailed level of design.
  • She starts with concept, structure, and information design before progressing to interaction and visual design. If the first thing she shows you looks like it could be the final product, she’s probably not a UX pro.
  • He is very interested in measurable success metrics and uses them to drive design direction and test protocol. If he speaks of making something easy, but can’t say how he’ll measure how easy it is, he’s not a UX pro.

2. You’re Not Letting the Right People do Their Jobs.

Great! You’ve got a solid UX pro or team and an exciting project kicked off. I hate to say it, but sometimes the very organization that values UX and hires us to do UX work is also the biggest impediment to a UX team’s success. Here are some rules of engagement that will enable UX teams to do their best work.

  • They really do need to talk with and observe end-users before the design is finished. This is the underpinning of what UX does. Give them reasonable and timely access to end-users.
  • Don’t provide subject-matter experts in place of users. Your team will tell you they’re not appropriate substitutes, and they will be right.
  • Give designers the authority (within technical constraints) on design decisions and researchers authority on test protocol and data interpretation.
  • Never design by committee. It’s a quick way to degrade a design.
  • You’ve hired your team to make a successful product. Be ready to make design changes—sometimes big ones—following user research and usability testing. The more usability recommendations are declined, the poorer quality the product’s user experience will be.
  • Don’t nibble the design to death. Making a series of minor changes here and there, or picking and choosing which aspects of a design to keep or omit almost always creates new usability issues.
  • Clearly define roles and responsibilities for all team members at the beginning of project work.

3. UX Work is Done in a Silo.

User experience work touches almost every aspect of an application or web project. Your UX resources will need regular check-ins with a multi-disciplinary team. At the very least, a development resource must be available to vet designs for technical feasibility and a business resource needs to make sure you’re aligned with their goals.

The risk of not having a technical resource aware of the design direction from the beginning is that time gets wasted working on a design that the coders can’t build. The risk of not having a business resource communicating with the UX team is that your design will not meet business needs, making it a waste of time and effort.

Even with a UX team ultimately responsible for designing your product, many other groups contribute to the final user experience. Establishing a shared vision across all the groups involved in a project encourages effective teamwork—a coordinated effort is far more likely to lead to a great design.

For more information, see “Breaking Down Silos.”

4. The UX Team is Brought in Too Late.

Tragically, many people view UX work as something that is done after coding to “make it look good.” They couldn’t be more wrong. We not-so-secretly call this “putting lipstick on a pig.”

The best time to bring in your UX team is at the initiation phase of the project lifecycle. The role of UX at this stage is to help define requirements and structural design based on user needs. This is where we have the biggest impact.

Because user experience pros follow a methodology called user-centered design, they need to stay consistently ahead of the development team. For product design to be user-centered, the design should be iterated and validated before it’s coded.

Have you observed other reasons UX teams might fall short? Please share your own experiences and thoughts by commenting.


Image of frustrated exec courtesy Shutterstock.

post authorHilary Little

Hilary Little, An interactive multimedia designer by training, Hilary has been in the business of human centred design for over 15 years. When she isn't working as a senior usability architect at the Canada Border Services Agency, she runs a successful UX consultancy, Hilary Little Ideation & Design. Armed with a good sense of humour and a load of empathy, she loves what she does for a living.

Hilary is an energetic person who holds dual Irish-Canadian citizenship. When she's not designing elegant interfaces or strategizing to mature a usability practice, she enjoys long distance running, eating obscenely spicy food and travelling with her husband and kids.    


Related Articles

Robb and Josh talk about the elevated levels of risk and experimentation required to move hyperautomation forward.

Article by UX Magazine Staff
Share:Invisible Machines Podcast: High Risk and Lots of Experimentation
1 min read
Article by Nate Schloesser
Using AI to Break Down Barriers in UX Design
  • In the article, the author explores the potential AI has to enhance accessibility in UX design by learning and adapting to individual users with disabilities.
  • The article covers these 7 techniques for enhancing accessibility with AI:
    • Text-to-Speech and Speech-to-Text
    • Image Recognition and Description
    • Voice Recognition
    • Personalization and Adaptation
    • Predictive Text and Autocomplete
    • Context-Aware Computing
    • Assistive Technologies
  • The demand for accessible and inclusive design will continue to increase, making it crucial for designers and developers to stay up-to-date on the latest advances in AI and accessibility.
Share:Using AI to Break Down Barriers in UX Design
11 min read

The insights on how leadership can make or break innovation and design projects.

Article by Rich Nadworny
The Leadership Leverage Points In A Design And Innovation System
  • According to the author, ,weaknesses in the design thinking process can often be traced back to leadership’s failure to support the project.
  • Leaders can maximize their impact on innovation and design by creating a compelling story, being clear about the consequences of not buying in, and implementing ongoing assessments to amplify successful practices.
Share:The Leadership Leverage Points In A Design And Innovation System
4 min read

This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Check our privacy policy and