Flag

We stand with Ukraine and our team members from Ukraine. Here are ways you can help

Get exclusive access to thought-provoking articles, bonus podcast content, and cutting-edge whitepapers. Become a member of the UX Magazine community today!

Home ›› Business Value and ROI ›› 6 Key Questions to Guide International UX Research ›› UX, Nude Celebrity Selfies, and the Cloud

UX, Nude Celebrity Selfies, and the Cloud

by Joseph Dickerson
4 min read
Share this post on
Tweet
Share
Post
Share
Email
Print

Save

Surprisingly, a series of grievous UX fails by Apple led to the recent leak of hundreds of private photos of female celebrities.

If you were paying attention to pop culture news this past weekend you’ve seen that a whole lot of photos of female celebrities in various levels of undress, leaked onto the Internet. The photos—illegally taken from the iCloud accounts of these very famous people—were the subject of many conversations online, though one topic was rarely discussed.

That topic is my bread and butter, the way I make a (pretty decent) living: user experience. While many people (very wrongfully) “blamed the victim,” I see another source of blame: bad user experience design. Bad design because it took choice away from these people. Bad UX, because it allowed hackers to access these photos way too easily. And this bad user experience came from a company renowned for it’s great user experience: Apple.

Let’s tick off the instances where Apple has failed these (and other) users, shall we?

UX Fail #1: Automatic photo and video backups to the cloud

Apple, in their desire to keeps things simple, defaults the choice to save photos and backups to the cloud. This means many people don’t even know that their photos are saved somewhere else. When the user selects something, even if they are distracted, they are still making that decision. By taking the decision away from the user, even if you tell them you did something on their behalf, they are much more likely to forget. And most users aren’t “tweakers”—they don’t go in and change settings to customize their experience. Apple, of all companies, should know this.

Most users don’t go in and change settings—Apple, of all companies, should know this

When it comes to this type of decision—moving important personal content to another location—complexity needs to be a part of the experience. Simplicity, for all its virtues, can result in lack of understanding and awareness. The right thing to do is to make things just a little more complicated: make users have to opt-in, not have to opt out. This needs to change, Apple. Now.

UX Fail #2: Lack of visibility

How many “backups” did these celebrities have saved to the cloud? Who knows, especially the end users. Go to your various iDevices and try to quickly discern how many backups you have “up there.” Go ahead, I’m waiting. Yes, you can eventually find this, if you access your iCloud directory through a file explorer … but how many people know how to do that? Many, if not most of these stolen photos were taken from backups—the actresses deleted the nude photos, but the backups still had them.

UX Fail #3: Keeping (almost) everything

How many backups does iCloud keep? How many photos? In their desire to be competitive with every other cloud service, they keep a lot, instead of intelligently purging old files. And, as referenced above, users have no idea what is up there unless they go look. I bet a lot of people are a little more curious today.

UX Fail #4: Unlimited password retries

Apparently the hackers (or perhaps hacker) got into many of the accounts by using a “brute force” attack, which meant they entered multiple password attempts without being stopped. Apple needs to lock this down, hard, and do what many in the tech and banking industry do: Three strikes, and your account is locked. And if you want in, you have to enter a code that is texted to your device and your correct password.

UX Fail #5: Lawyerly language, instead of apologizes

The press release Apple put out after this news broke was … well … it was a big ol’ pile of CYA (cover your ass). It basically blamed the victims, and implied that their passwords weren’t strong enough. It was written by a room full of lawyers, instead of an empathetic human being. What they should have done was say how secure that the iCloud was, how upset they were, and how they will be making their secure system even more secure for users everywhere.

Thankfully for Apple, only the tech media paid attention to this release, so it wasn’t as bad a PR blunder as it could have been—but we’ll see how Apple handles things next week, when it is scheduled to announce a new iPhone or two.

Closing

So, where does this leave Apple? Best case scenario, their reputation has taken a temporary hit that has impacted the biggest and best “feature” Apple iDevices have: Trust. Users trust Apple and Apple devices.

Apple has long understood that these were not consumer electronic devices—they were personal devices, with an emphasis on personal. When the first iPhone came out a friend of mine said that it was like “an extension of my own hand.” It was a trusted extension of his self.

If Apple can’t protect celebrity pictures, how can protect user’s bank accounts, or health information? Once trust is lost, it is hard to recover. Time will tell how many users will no longer trust their iDevices because of this, and go to the many alternatives out there. I know some celebrities are probably looking very closely at the newest Android phones right now…

 

Image of Jennifer Lawrence courtesy s_bukley and Shutterstock.

post authorJoseph Dickerson

Joseph Dickerson
Joseph Dickerson is a writer, technologist, and user experience lead who specializes in "next-gen" experiences and products. A designer of multiple mobile and Internet applications, he has worked to make technology easier and better fo users for over a decade. The author of several books, including a primer on user experience design, Experience Matters, Dickerson is a regular contributor to many websites as well as editor of This Week in UX, This Week in Geek and The Twin Peaks Gazette. He recently completed his second book on UX, UX 101.

Tweet
Share
Post
Share
Email
Print

Related Articles

Find out why slapping badges and points into your app doesn’t work and what six principles from real game design actually drive long-term engagement.

Article by Montgomery Singman
Gamification 2.0. Beyond Points and Badges: Designing for Players, Not Metrics. Chapter 2: The Solution
  • The piece argues that gamification fails when game aesthetics are borrowed, but game logic is not. Real game designers use six principles to bring real engagement: authentic mastery, meaningful choice, flow-calibrated challenge, rewarded exploration, self-expressed identity, and real social interdependence. The fix isn’t more mechanics; it’s making the experience itself worth repeating.
Share:Gamification 2.0. Beyond Points and Badges: Designing for Players, Not Metrics. Chapter 2: The Solution
5 min read

Learn how one product designer built a faster, sharper workflow where AI does the scaffolding, judgment owns the outcome, and nothing ships without a traceable why.

Article by Pavel Bukengolts
The Spiral Climbs: Ideas Are Expensive, Systems Are Cheap
  • The piece explores that design is no longer about designing screens but owning systems, bets, and outcomes. But the core judgment, empathy, and research are irreplaceable. I chain Miro, Figma, VS Code, GitHub, and Jira into one traceable loop from idea to learning. AI takes on the exploration and scaffolding. People own architecture, security, and accountability. A 48-hour operating cadence of small, measurable bets, linked artifacts, and documented decisions keeps speed honest.
Share:The Spiral Climbs: Ideas Are Expensive, Systems Are Cheap
6 min read

Discover why the points, badges, and streaks in your favorite apps aren’t really gamification.

Article by Montgomery Singman
Gamification 2.0. Beyond Points and Badges: Designing for Players, Not Metrics. Chapter 1: The Problem
  • The piece claims that most apps misuse gamification, copying superficial mechanics like points and badges that trick rather than motivate people, and that the experience itself is what truly drives engagement, just like good games do.
Share:Gamification 2.0. Beyond Points and Badges: Designing for Players, Not Metrics. Chapter 1: The Problem
4 min read

Join the UX Magazine community!

Stay informed with exclusive content on the intersection of UX, AI agents, and agentic automation—essential reading for future-focused professionals.

Hello!

You're officially a member of the UX Magazine Community.
We're excited to have you with us!

Thank you!

To begin viewing member content, please verify your email.

Get Paid to Test AI Products

Earn an average of $100 per test by reviewing AI-first product experiences and sharing your feedback.

    Tell us about you. Enroll in the course.

      This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Check our privacy policy and