Flag

We stand with Ukraine and our team members from Ukraine. Here are ways you can help

Get exclusive access to thought-provoking articles, bonus podcast content, and cutting-edge whitepapers. Become a member of the UX Magazine community today!

Home ›› Business Value and ROI ›› 6 Key Questions to Guide International UX Research ›› The Power of Value Stream Maps

The Power of Value Stream Maps

by Rishabh Dayal
4 min read
Share this post on
Tweet
Share
Post
Share
Email
Print

Save

Mapping the path of a customer’s experience shows where improvements can be made.

Our experience as customers of a product or service is shaped by the various interactions that we have with it. Some of these touch points add value to customers while others do not.

For example, a doctor’s office may offer patients the ability to book appointments online, which likely adds value. However patients may find themselves waiting for an hour in the doctor’s office, clearly an instance of non-value added. From a business perspective, understanding these various touch points and their impact on customer experience offers useful insights.

The goal should be to eliminate or reduce all the non-value added activities to deliver an exceptional experience, and one tool for generating the required insights is a value stream map. Value stream maps identify and analyze each of the activities associated with customer experience holistically to determine if the activity is value added or non-value added.

Keeping with the example of a visit to the doctor, the customer might perform the following activities:

  1. Check-in at the front desk
  2. Wait to be called for further information
  3. Called to the front desk to validate personal and insurance information
  4. Wait to be called again to see the doctor
  5. Called to go to a room to see the doctor
  6. Wait for the doctor
  7. Speak to the doctor

Each activity in the value stream above either adds value (check-in, speak to the doctor) or subtracts value (wait to be called, wait to be called again). A value stream map is designed to capture the value of each activity and the impact it has on the customer’s experience.

With this information, you can work to reduce or remove the activities that are not adding value and improve upon activities that do—reducing costs while increasing the value of your product to customers.

Making the Map

The first iteration of the map can be created in low fidelity using sticky notes and then iteratively refined into a higher fidelity version.

Graphic by Russell Parish

Here are the steps for creating a value stream map.

1. Map the entire experience from beginning to end from the customer’s perspective. Capture each activity and the duration of the interaction. The duration is an important metric since it allows you to compare the length of each activity. You also need to capture the duration of time between activities. For the patient, the time between activities is spent waiting.

2. Add information flows to the map—answering the question: What is needed to enable the customer to move to the next activity? For a patient in a doctor’s office to move from activity two to activity three, their personal, contact, and insurance information must be validated. Capturing information flows enables you to ask questions like: Is all of the information necessary? Can it be captured at another time?

3. Determine if an activity adds value for the customer or not. If you had an appointment to see a doctor a value added activity would be the time you spent with the doctor. A non-value added activity would be waiting for the doctor.

4. Draw timeline capturing each activity. Write in the time spent on the value added activities (seen here in blue) and non-value added activities (in this case the time spent waiting, seen in red). This will enable you to quickly differentiate the two types of activities. You can also compare value added time versus non-value added time throughout the duration of the experience.

5. Aggregate the time spent on all non-value added activities. This will give you an understanding of how much non-value added time is clogging the experience. More than likely there will be a range—looking at the map in our example, the total non-value added time is 25-110 minutes. Areas with a high range of time, like a wait of five to 30 minutes indicate bottlenecks where there are opportunities for improvement.

6. Look at the causes of non-value added time. In this case, what are the drivers that contribute to the patients waiting time? Why do patients have to wait from five to 30 minutes after they sign in at the front desk? Share the value stream map with employees to get additional information, trying to understand:

  • The activity the customers are participating in
  • Their pain points
  • The waste in their activity

7. Determine which areas can be addressed. There may be factors such as time, budget, and employee skillsets that will influence which activities can be eliminated or changed.

Putting the “Value” in Value Stream Maps

Look to your map for incremental opportunities to improve. The goal shouldn’t be to have one “big bang” transformation but to rather create a culture of constant improvement. Once the current state has been mapped and the areas for improvement determined, it’s time to create a future state, which displays the value stream with the proposed improvements. This would show the doctor’s office with reduced or eliminated waiting time.

Value stream maps can be cyclical: capturing the current state, sketching out a future state, optimizing for incremental improvements, and tracking performance against incremental improvements creates the opportunity to use the future state map as the current state map for another round of research.

Conclusion

Value stream maps can create a culture improvement for businesses, enabling them to focus on delivering exceptional experiences to their customers. Looking for non-value added activities can reduce costs by eliminating extraneous steps in a process. It goes without saying that having a product or service that delivers as much value as possible for customers provides a real competitive advantage.

 

Image of idyllic Thai stream courtesty Shutterstock.

post authorRishabh Dayal

Rishabh Dayal
Rishabh Dayal is a senior data expert for a leading global management consultancy. He has consulted for Fortune 500 companies in insurance, retail and healthcare. He specializes in analyzing large data sets and deriving meaningful insights to drive decision making.

Tweet
Share
Post
Share
Email
Print

Related Articles

Find out why slapping badges and points into your app doesn’t work and what six principles from real game design actually drive long-term engagement.

Article by Montgomery Singman
Gamification 2.0. Beyond Points and Badges: Designing for Players, Not Metrics. Chapter 2: The Solution
  • The piece argues that gamification fails when game aesthetics are borrowed, but game logic is not. Real game designers use six principles to bring real engagement: authentic mastery, meaningful choice, flow-calibrated challenge, rewarded exploration, self-expressed identity, and real social interdependence. The fix isn’t more mechanics; it’s making the experience itself worth repeating.
Share:Gamification 2.0. Beyond Points and Badges: Designing for Players, Not Metrics. Chapter 2: The Solution
5 min read

Learn how one product designer built a faster, sharper workflow where AI does the scaffolding, judgment owns the outcome, and nothing ships without a traceable why.

Article by Pavel Bukengolts
The Spiral Climbs: Ideas Are Expensive, Systems Are Cheap
  • The piece explores that design is no longer about designing screens but owning systems, bets, and outcomes. But the core judgment, empathy, and research are irreplaceable. I chain Miro, Figma, VS Code, GitHub, and Jira into one traceable loop from idea to learning. AI takes on the exploration and scaffolding. People own architecture, security, and accountability. A 48-hour operating cadence of small, measurable bets, linked artifacts, and documented decisions keeps speed honest.
Share:The Spiral Climbs: Ideas Are Expensive, Systems Are Cheap
6 min read

Discover why the points, badges, and streaks in your favorite apps aren’t really gamification.

Article by Montgomery Singman
Gamification 2.0. Beyond Points and Badges: Designing for Players, Not Metrics. Chapter 1: The Problem
  • The piece claims that most apps misuse gamification, copying superficial mechanics like points and badges that trick rather than motivate people, and that the experience itself is what truly drives engagement, just like good games do.
Share:Gamification 2.0. Beyond Points and Badges: Designing for Players, Not Metrics. Chapter 1: The Problem
4 min read

Join the UX Magazine community!

Stay informed with exclusive content on the intersection of UX, AI agents, and agentic automation—essential reading for future-focused professionals.

Hello!

You're officially a member of the UX Magazine Community.
We're excited to have you with us!

Thank you!

To begin viewing member content, please verify your email.

Get Paid to Test AI Products

Earn an average of $100 per test by reviewing AI-first product experiences and sharing your feedback.

    Tell us about you. Enroll in the course.

      This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Check our privacy policy and