Flag

We stand with Ukraine and our team members from Ukraine. Here are ways you can help

Get exclusive access to thought-provoking articles, bonus podcast content, and cutting-edge whitepapers. Become a member of the UX Magazine community today!

Home ›› Business Value and ROI ›› 6 Key Questions to Guide International UX Research ›› POP UX! Clued Into Curiosity

POP UX! Clued Into Curiosity

by Andrew Zusman
3 min read
Share this post on
Tweet
Share
Post
Share
Email
Print

Save

Clue, the classic murder-mystery board game, shows designers how to create an information gap and a narrative that leads users to the other side.

On a dark and stormy night, six colorful people gather in a country manor home, each holding a deadly weapon. Before the evening’s end, there will be a murder and it will be up to you to solve it!

Clue, or Cluedo outside of the United States, is a board game based on the classic whodunit murder-mystery. Clue provides the same enjoyment readers get out of reading murder mysteries by playing on a powerful but often underutilized desire in Web, tablet, and mobile design: curiosity. Curiosity can help user experience designers drive user action by creating an information gap and then directing users on how to fill it in.

User experience designers strive to make their designs clear, understandable, and simple because the concept of usability hinges on users being able to instantly recognize what to do and how to behave. Adding an element of curiosity encourages designers to develop the unknown rather than to make clear what is already known.

A gap in information can create a desire to fill in what’s missing. User experience designers can capitalize on this desire by designing a specific user flow that will lead users to the information that fills in the gap. Cultivating this information gap and flow can be a powerful weapon in the user experience design arsenal.

Clue has an incredibly simple interface: three cards representing the murderer, the weapon, and the location of the murder are selected and hidden at the beginning of the game. The players move from room to room and ask questions to try and determine which cards other players have in order to make an educated guess about the secret cards.

There is a gap in the user’s information: Who is the murderer? What weapon did they use? In which room did they commit the crime? A specific user flow allows the users to find the answers: move from room to room, ask other players about their cards, and fill in the information gap through a process of elimination. Just as Clue has a narrative built around an information gap, Clouds Over Cuba and Only Because We Can are digital experiences that capitalize on a similarly mysterious narrative.

Clouds Over Cuba is a web- and mobile-based documentary that explores the Cuban Missile Crisis and what might have occurred had it boiled over in to war. The site creates an information gap between what users know about the historical events, what they might not know about these events, and a possible alternative outcome. This information gap, much like trying to determine the murderer in Clue, pushes users to continue through the documentary. Even rolling over the “Start Documentary” button on the main screen illuminates this information gap, sparking a high level of curiosity with the image of a demolished U.S. Capitol building.

Similarly, the website Only Because We Can sparks curiosity with a narrative. The site is an interactive video that has an intriguing storyline. The story captures the user’s interest, and before they realize it, they’ve watched and interacted with several minutes of a clothing commercial. Viewers want to know how the story will end—much like Clue players, they want the secret cards to be revealed.

Curiosity can drive an experience in the direction that the designer chooses. Considering what information might be important to the user and then using that information in carrot-and-stick fashion can lead users through specific flows. Harnessing the unknown, rather than explicitly stating information, can generate curiosity and spark interest in a website, application, or product.

What other ways does curiosity aid user experience design? What other websites or applications use an information gap and narrative structure similar to the gameplay in Clue to drive user flows? Please share your thoughts and ideas.

post authorAndrew Zusman

Andrew Zusman
Andrew Zusman is a user experience designer at Inkod-Hypera and the creator of the 52 Designers project. Andrew is also the writer of a popular user experience design blog. He lives in Tel-Aviv, Israel with his girlfriend Natasha and their dog Indy.

Tweet
Share
Post
Share
Email
Print

Related Articles

Learn when to talk to users, and when to watch them in order to uncover real insights and design experiences that truly work.

Article by Paivi Salminen
Usability Tests vs. Focus Groups
  • The article distinguishes between usability tests and focus groups, highlighting their different roles in UX research.
  • It explains that focus groups gather opinions and attitudes, while usability tests observe real user behavior to find design issues.
  • The piece stresses using each method at the right stage to build the right product and ensure a better user experience.
Share:Usability Tests vs. Focus Groups
2 min read

Explore how interaction data uncovers hidden user-behavior patterns that drive smarter product decisions, better UX, and continuous improvement.

Article by Srikanth R
The Power of Interaction Data: Tracking User Behavior in Modern Web Apps
  • The article explains how interaction data like clicks, scrolls, and session patterns reveals real user behavior beyond basic analytics.
  • It shows how tools such as heatmaps and session replays turn this data into actionable insights that improve UX and product decisions.
  • The piece emphasizes using behavioral insights responsibly, balancing optimization with user privacy and ethical data practices.
Share:The Power of Interaction Data: Tracking User Behavior in Modern Web Apps
14 min read

Explore how design researchers can earn the trust and buy-in that give studies impact, even as AI shifts how teams work.

Article by Sara Fortier
Earning the Right to Research: Stakeholder Buy-In and Influence in the AI x UX Era
  • The article emphasizes that synthetic data and AI tools promise speed, but not the alignment or shared purpose that makes design research effective in solving design problems.
  • It asserts that meaningful human-centred design begins with trust and the permission to conduct research properly (i.e., strategically).
  • The piece outlines how to build stakeholder buy-in for design research through practical strategies that build influence piece by piece within an organization.
  • Adapted from the book Design Research Mastery, it offers grounded ways to enable impactful user studies in today’s AI-driven landscape.
Share:Earning the Right to Research: Stakeholder Buy-In and Influence in the AI x UX Era
12 min read

Join the UX Magazine community!

Stay informed with exclusive content on the intersection of UX, AI agents, and agentic automation—essential reading for future-focused professionals.

Hello!

You're officially a member of the UX Magazine Community.
We're excited to have you with us!

Thank you!

To begin viewing member content, please verify your email.

Get Paid to Test AI Products

Earn an average of $100 per test by reviewing AI-first product experiences and sharing your feedback.

    Tell us about you. Enroll in the course.

      This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Check our privacy policy and