Flag

We stand with Ukraine and our team members from Ukraine. Here are ways you can help

Get exclusive access to thought-provoking articles, bonus podcast content, and cutting-edge whitepapers. Become a member of the UX Magazine community today!

Home ›› Business Value and ROI ›› 6 Key Questions to Guide International UX Research ›› POP UX! Clued Into Curiosity

POP UX! Clued Into Curiosity

by Andrew Zusman
3 min read
Share this post on
Tweet
Share
Post
Share
Email
Print

Save

Clue, the classic murder-mystery board game, shows designers how to create an information gap and a narrative that leads users to the other side.

On a dark and stormy night, six colorful people gather in a country manor home, each holding a deadly weapon. Before the evening’s end, there will be a murder and it will be up to you to solve it!

Clue, or Cluedo outside of the United States, is a board game based on the classic whodunit murder-mystery. Clue provides the same enjoyment readers get out of reading murder mysteries by playing on a powerful but often underutilized desire in Web, tablet, and mobile design: curiosity. Curiosity can help user experience designers drive user action by creating an information gap and then directing users on how to fill it in.

User experience designers strive to make their designs clear, understandable, and simple because the concept of usability hinges on users being able to instantly recognize what to do and how to behave. Adding an element of curiosity encourages designers to develop the unknown rather than to make clear what is already known.

A gap in information can create a desire to fill in what’s missing. User experience designers can capitalize on this desire by designing a specific user flow that will lead users to the information that fills in the gap. Cultivating this information gap and flow can be a powerful weapon in the user experience design arsenal.

Clue has an incredibly simple interface: three cards representing the murderer, the weapon, and the location of the murder are selected and hidden at the beginning of the game. The players move from room to room and ask questions to try and determine which cards other players have in order to make an educated guess about the secret cards.

There is a gap in the user’s information: Who is the murderer? What weapon did they use? In which room did they commit the crime? A specific user flow allows the users to find the answers: move from room to room, ask other players about their cards, and fill in the information gap through a process of elimination. Just as Clue has a narrative built around an information gap, Clouds Over Cuba and Only Because We Can are digital experiences that capitalize on a similarly mysterious narrative.

Clouds Over Cuba is a web- and mobile-based documentary that explores the Cuban Missile Crisis and what might have occurred had it boiled over in to war. The site creates an information gap between what users know about the historical events, what they might not know about these events, and a possible alternative outcome. This information gap, much like trying to determine the murderer in Clue, pushes users to continue through the documentary. Even rolling over the “Start Documentary” button on the main screen illuminates this information gap, sparking a high level of curiosity with the image of a demolished U.S. Capitol building.

Similarly, the website Only Because We Can sparks curiosity with a narrative. The site is an interactive video that has an intriguing storyline. The story captures the user’s interest, and before they realize it, they’ve watched and interacted with several minutes of a clothing commercial. Viewers want to know how the story will end—much like Clue players, they want the secret cards to be revealed.

Curiosity can drive an experience in the direction that the designer chooses. Considering what information might be important to the user and then using that information in carrot-and-stick fashion can lead users through specific flows. Harnessing the unknown, rather than explicitly stating information, can generate curiosity and spark interest in a website, application, or product.

What other ways does curiosity aid user experience design? What other websites or applications use an information gap and narrative structure similar to the gameplay in Clue to drive user flows? Please share your thoughts and ideas.

post authorAndrew Zusman

Andrew Zusman
Andrew Zusman is a user experience designer at Inkod-Hypera and the creator of the 52 Designers project. Andrew is also the writer of a popular user experience design blog. He lives in Tel-Aviv, Israel with his girlfriend Natasha and their dog Indy.

Tweet
Share
Post
Share
Email
Print

Related Articles

Real engagement is about designing experiences that people want to have. Here are some things that games do well that most apps don’t.

Article by Montgomery Singman
Gamification 2.0. Beyond Points and Badges: Designing for Players, Not Metrics. Conclusion
  • Most apps use gamification as a manipulation layer to drive metrics, but people engage with things that are truly worthy of their time, not points or streak guilt.
  • Apps that people stick with do this by designing for intrinsic motivation, making the experience itself rewarding.
  • The true measure of success is whether users feel more capable, accomplished, and enriched for having used your app.
Share:Gamification 2.0. Beyond Points and Badges: Designing for Players, Not Metrics. Conclusion
8 min read

For researchers, AI tools are making the move from advising to building easier than ever. But the real obstacle was never technical. Meet the researchers who allowed themselves to create — and what the cost was.

Article by James Lang
The New Makers
  • The article says that becoming a maker as a researcher is less about learning new tools or skills and more about giving yourself a new identity, and that without fixing the internal permission structures that define your swim lane, even the most democratized AI tools won’t turn a researcher into a maker — you don’t have a founder; you have a frustrated advisor with a prototype.
Share:The New Makers
20 min read

Learn why authentic gamification is rooted in game genres rather than just collecting badges.

Article by Montgomery Singman
Gamification 2.0. Beyond Points and Badges: Designing for Players, Not Metrics. Chapter 5: Implementation
  • The article says that successful gamification is picking a game genre that fits your app’s core activities and user psychology, building satisfying intrinsic loops before adding extrinsic rewards, and iterating nonstop, and that without these foundations, you don’t have gamification; you have a progress bar that has a terminal point.
Share:Gamification 2.0. Beyond Points and Badges: Designing for Players, Not Metrics. Chapter 5: Implementation
5 min read

Join the UX Magazine community!

Stay informed with exclusive content on the intersection of UX, AI agents, and agentic automation—essential reading for future-focused professionals.

Hello!

You're officially a member of the UX Magazine Community.
We're excited to have you with us!

Thank you!

To begin viewing member content, please verify your email.

Get Paid to Test AI Products

Earn an average of $100 per test by reviewing AI-first product experiences and sharing your feedback.

    Tell us about you. Enroll in the course.

      This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Check our privacy policy and