Flag

We stand with Ukraine and our team members from Ukraine. Here are ways you can help

Get exclusive access to thought-provoking articles, bonus podcast content, and cutting-edge whitepapers. Become a member of the UX Magazine community today!

Forms are a Conversation

by Nathan Barry
4 min read
Share this post on
Tweet
Share
Post
Share
Email
Print

Save

When designing forms, think about your queries in the form of a conversation.

The users of your software always visit with a goal in mind. Often in web applications, a form stands between them and that goal. Whether the user wants to join a community like Facebook to connect with their friends or use a project management tool to organize their business, forms are there to hurdle.

These forms aren’t necessarily bad, we just need to remember that they are a step in the process—a step that must be completed before the user can reach their goal. So we want to make that step as painless as possible.

A Conversation

Try thinking about the form as a conversation: “I’m going to ask you a few questions so that you can complete your task.” But like any conversation, context and order are really important. Let’s say you and I have just met and after a quick introduction I ask, “What’s your address?” Your likely response would be shock: “Why should I tell you?” After all, we’ve only just met, you don’t know anything about me, and I am asking for personal information. I haven’t given you any reason why I need it.

Online forms are the same. If you ask for too much information too early, your users will pull out. “Why does this shopping website need my address? I haven’t even decided if I am going to purchase from them yet?”

Let’s try another example. You and I meet, but this time we talk for a while, find a mutual interest, and I offer to give you a copy of my favorite book on the subject. Now if I ask for your address to send you the book, your reaction will probably be completely different.

So before asking for personal information in a web application you need two things: trust and a reason.

Building Trust

The best way to build trust is to share information about your software: what it does, who created it, and especially how it will help the potential user. After all, at this point they are just reading about it, and not yet using it. The more you share about how it will help them, the more they will want to trust your software. Then when it comes time to ask for information about them, such as their name and email address to create an account, there will already be some trust built up.

Having a Reason

Let’s say that to browse an exclusive e-commerce website you need to create an account (a silly requirement, but this is just an example). If the create-account form asked for your physical address you may feel your privacy violated, because they haven’t given you a reason yet. Sure, if you buy something your address is needed to ship it to you, but you haven’t made that purchase yet. If the website instead waits to ask for your address until you’ve decided to make a purchase, then there is a reason for asking. You will be much more likely to give it to them.

So, just like in a conversation, when and how a question is asked has a huge impact on whether or not it will be answered.

A Conversation not an Interrogation

If I ask you a few sensible questions, then we are having a conversation. If instead I bombard you with questions, our friendly conversation starts to feel more like an interrogation. So limiting the number of questions asked will go a long way toward maintaining a friendly relationship with your user.

In real life you may feel like you have a social obligation to stay active in the conversation, rather than flipping me off and walking away. But that social obligation is not there at all on the web. With a single click of the back button users can exit a conversation they don’t like and never come back.

Look carefully at every question you are asking. It’s likely that about half of them can be removed. If later on you need more information, you can always ask the question when you have a reason for asking.

If you approach the questions in your form like you would a conversation with a stranger, then your users will be more likely to answer them.

 

 

Portions of this article are excerpts from Nathan Barrys’s book, Designing Web Applications, an everyman’s guide to building apps with solid usability that launches today.

 

 

Image of chatty tea party courtesy Shutterstock.

post authorNathan Barry

Nathan Barry
Nathan Barry is an interface designer and app developer who is passionate about designing software that is a joy to use. After leading the software design team at a startup in Boise, Idaho, where he lives, Nathan began working independently, designing and developing his own apps. He is the author of Designing Web Applications and he loves to travel. Follow him @nathanbarry on Twitter.

Tweet
Share
Post
Share
Email
Print

Related Articles

Another lesson from studying UX with Laura Klein.

Article by Paivi Salminen
The Agile Trap Designers Fall into: Feeding the Beast
  • Agile teams are fast, but designers get stuck in an infinite loop of visual work: redesigning the same components over and over instead of solving real UX problems.
  • Design systems break that cycle, defining the building blocks once, freeing designers to focus on how the product works, not how it looks.
  • When the basics are in place, teams can start working together sooner, prototype faster, and release incremental features without the interface falling apart.
Share:The Agile Trap Designers Fall into: Feeding the Beast
4 min read

Real engagement is about designing experiences that people want to have. Here are some things that games do well that most apps don’t.

Article by Montgomery Singman
Gamification 2.0. Beyond Points and Badges: Designing for Players, Not Metrics. Conclusion
  • Most apps use gamification as a manipulation layer to drive metrics, but people engage with things that are truly worthy of their time, not points or streak guilt.
  • Apps that people stick with do this by designing for intrinsic motivation, making the experience itself rewarding.
  • The true measure of success is whether users feel more capable, accomplished, and enriched for having used your app.
Share:Gamification 2.0. Beyond Points and Badges: Designing for Players, Not Metrics. Conclusion
8 min read

For researchers, AI tools are making the move from advising to building easier than ever. But the real obstacle was never technical. Meet the researchers who allowed themselves to create — and what the cost was.

Article by James Lang
The New Makers
  • The article says that becoming a maker as a researcher is less about learning new tools or skills and more about giving yourself a new identity, and that without fixing the internal permission structures that define your swim lane, even the most democratized AI tools won’t turn a researcher into a maker — you don’t have a founder; you have a frustrated advisor with a prototype.
Share:The New Makers
20 min read

Join the UX Magazine community!

Stay informed with exclusive content on the intersection of UX, AI agents, and agentic automation—essential reading for future-focused professionals.

Hello!

You're officially a member of the UX Magazine Community.
We're excited to have you with us!

Thank you!

To begin viewing member content, please verify your email.

Get Paid to Test AI Products

Earn an average of $100 per test by reviewing AI-first product experiences and sharing your feedback.

    Tell us about you. Enroll in the course.

      This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Check our privacy policy and