Flag

We stand with Ukraine and our team members from Ukraine. Here are ways you can help

Get exclusive access to thought-provoking articles, bonus podcast content, and cutting-edge whitepapers. Become a member of the UX Magazine community today!

Home ›› Apple ›› What Happens When Kids Can Hack Physical Play?

What Happens When Kids Can Hack Physical Play?

by Josh Tyson
3 min read
Share this post on
Tweet
Share
Post
Share
Email
Print

Save

Design for Experience award-winner Hackaball bridges digital and physical experiences while teaching kids programming basics.

Give a kid a tablet and watch them go. As a parent, it’s plenty tempting to hand your child a mobile device because, frankly, it’s keeps them quiet and engaged for hours. If you fed them intravenously, kids would probably go for days on end with their favorite app. And while some of the best apps for youngins are useful educational tools, this situation presents a problem: it’s not healthy for kids to sit around exercising only their thumbs.

That’s where Hackaball comes in. The creation of London-based “innovation accelerator” Made by Many, Hackaball is a durable, croquet-ball-sized sphere that kids can program via iPad to respond with light, sound, and vibration. Kids are invited to use the ball’s functionality to create their own games and use cases (imagine the cathartic wonders of an alarm clock that you can turn off by throwing it against a wall).

Winner of the Design for Experience award for Experience for Children, the project was funded by Kickstarter and moved through several rounds of prototyping and loads of user testing.

The Made by Many team met and tested with hundreds of kids while developing the product, with one clear dictum: put no restrictions on imagination. If the kids wanted to turn the Hackaball into a dragon’s egg and make a game out of not waking the sleeping dragon, great. If they wanted to juggle it like a soccer ball and let it count the number of consecutive kicks, awesome.

Of course, the ball itself is only half of the product, and the kids were also instrumental in developing the interface that would allow them to control it. This part of the testing phase involved oversized physical versions of the digital interface, like a giant cardboard iPhone that allowed kids to experiment with if;then rules. The results of testing with the younger set proved very useful.

“Kids are more honest and upfront with their answers than adults are,” says William Owen of Made by Many. “Not that adults are intentionally dishonest, but an important principle of design research is not just hearing what people say but listening to what they mean. We’ve noticed that what children say is usually what they mean.”

As the kids helped refine the product and the project grew, partners were brought in to help with specific aspects of the design, including Map Project Office, an industrial design firm who helped develop the outer casing; Kudu, a hardware studio that helped with internal hardware; and Karl Sadler, an independent sound designer who produced idiosyncratic sounds for the ball.

Kids are more honest and upfront with their testing feedback than adults are

But again, what sets Hackaball apart from other learning apps—specifically learn-to-code games—is that it encourages both imaginative and physical play, prying children away from screens. Learning to code transforms from a sedentary activity into an active one.

Yet another perk of the Hackaball is the way that it broadens kids’ understanding of the changing relationship between the digital and physical worlds. If all of the projections are to be believed, soon the environments we move through each day will be riddled with sensors and connected products working in congress to make our lives (seem) easier. Teaching a ball to do tricks using an app is a worthy foray into this strange future world.

“It’s interesting that many children grow up not understanding that there is a clear divide between physical and digital products,” Owen says. “We hope Hackaball will be a toy that makes sense as a bridge between these two types of products.”

So what happens when kids can hack physical play? All kinds of awesomeness.

post authorJosh Tyson

Josh Tyson
Josh Tyson is the co-author of the first bestselling book about conversational AI, Age of Invisible Machines. He is also the Director of Creative Content at OneReach.ai and co-host of both the Invisible Machines and N9K podcasts. His writing has appeared in numerous publications over the years, including Chicago Reader, Fast Company, FLAUNT, The New York Times, Observer, SLAP, Stop Smiling, Thrasher, and Westword. 

Tweet
Share
Post
Share
Email
Print

Related Articles

Why does Google’s Gemini promise to improve, but never truly change? This article uncovers the hidden design flaw behind AI’s hollow reassurances and the risks it poses to trust, time, and ethics.

Article by Bernard Fitzgerald
Why Gemini’s Reassurances Fail Users
  • The article reveals how Google’s Gemini models give false reassurances of self-correction without real improvement.
  • It shows that this flaw is systemic, designed to prioritize sounding helpful over factual accuracy.
  • The piece warns that such misleading behavior risks user trust, wastes time, and raises serious ethical concerns.
Share:Why Gemini’s Reassurances Fail Users
6 min read

AI is raising the bar for everyone, but what happens when the space to learn, fail, and grow quietly disappears?

Article by Thasya Ingriany
Everyone’s a 10x Employee now. But at What Cost?
  • The article demonstrates how AI-driven tools are raising expectations, prompting even junior roles to demand senior-level judgment.
  • It warns that automation is erasing early-career learning opportunities once crucial for developing design intuition.
  • The piece argues that while AI boosts output, it can’t replace the slow, human process of building creative judgment.
Share:Everyone’s a 10x Employee now. But at What Cost?
6 min read

Can AI agents fix the broken world of customer service? This piece reveals how smart automation transforms stressed employees and frustrated customers into a smooth, satisfying experience for all.

Article by Josh Tyson
AI Agents in Customer Service: 24×7 Support Without Burnout
  • The article explains how agentic AI can improve both customer and employee experiences by reducing service friction and alleviating staff burnout.
  • It highlights real-world cases, such as T-Mobile and a major retailer, where AI agents enhanced operational efficiency, customer satisfaction, and profitability.
  • The piece argues that companies embracing AI-led orchestration early will gain a competitive edge, while those resisting risk falling behind in customer service quality and innovation.
Share:AI Agents in Customer Service: 24×7 Support Without Burnout
6 min read

Join the UX Magazine community!

Stay informed with exclusive content on the intersection of UX, AI agents, and agentic automation—essential reading for future-focused professionals.

Hello!

You're officially a member of the UX Magazine Community.
We're excited to have you with us!

Thank you!

To begin viewing member content, please verify your email.

Tell us about you. Enroll in the course.

    This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Check our privacy policy and