Flag

We stand with Ukraine and our team members from Ukraine. Here are ways you can help

Get exclusive access to thought-provoking articles, bonus podcast content, and cutting-edge whitepapers. Become a member of the UX Magazine community today!

Home ›› Apple ›› What Happens When Kids Can Hack Physical Play?

What Happens When Kids Can Hack Physical Play?

by Josh Tyson
3 min read
Share this post on
Tweet
Share
Post
Share
Email
Print

Save

Design for Experience award-winner Hackaball bridges digital and physical experiences while teaching kids programming basics.

Give a kid a tablet and watch them go. As a parent, it’s plenty tempting to hand your child a mobile device because, frankly, it’s keeps them quiet and engaged for hours. If you fed them intravenously, kids would probably go for days on end with their favorite app. And while some of the best apps for youngins are useful educational tools, this situation presents a problem: it’s not healthy for kids to sit around exercising only their thumbs.

That’s where Hackaball comes in. The creation of London-based “innovation accelerator” Made by Many, Hackaball is a durable, croquet-ball-sized sphere that kids can program via iPad to respond with light, sound, and vibration. Kids are invited to use the ball’s functionality to create their own games and use cases (imagine the cathartic wonders of an alarm clock that you can turn off by throwing it against a wall).

Winner of the Design for Experience award for Experience for Children, the project was funded by Kickstarter and moved through several rounds of prototyping and loads of user testing.

The Made by Many team met and tested with hundreds of kids while developing the product, with one clear dictum: put no restrictions on imagination. If the kids wanted to turn the Hackaball into a dragon’s egg and make a game out of not waking the sleeping dragon, great. If they wanted to juggle it like a soccer ball and let it count the number of consecutive kicks, awesome.

Of course, the ball itself is only half of the product, and the kids were also instrumental in developing the interface that would allow them to control it. This part of the testing phase involved oversized physical versions of the digital interface, like a giant cardboard iPhone that allowed kids to experiment with if;then rules. The results of testing with the younger set proved very useful.

“Kids are more honest and upfront with their answers than adults are,” says William Owen of Made by Many. “Not that adults are intentionally dishonest, but an important principle of design research is not just hearing what people say but listening to what they mean. We’ve noticed that what children say is usually what they mean.”

As the kids helped refine the product and the project grew, partners were brought in to help with specific aspects of the design, including Map Project Office, an industrial design firm who helped develop the outer casing; Kudu, a hardware studio that helped with internal hardware; and Karl Sadler, an independent sound designer who produced idiosyncratic sounds for the ball.

Kids are more honest and upfront with their testing feedback than adults are

But again, what sets Hackaball apart from other learning apps—specifically learn-to-code games—is that it encourages both imaginative and physical play, prying children away from screens. Learning to code transforms from a sedentary activity into an active one.

Yet another perk of the Hackaball is the way that it broadens kids’ understanding of the changing relationship between the digital and physical worlds. If all of the projections are to be believed, soon the environments we move through each day will be riddled with sensors and connected products working in congress to make our lives (seem) easier. Teaching a ball to do tricks using an app is a worthy foray into this strange future world.

“It’s interesting that many children grow up not understanding that there is a clear divide between physical and digital products,” Owen says. “We hope Hackaball will be a toy that makes sense as a bridge between these two types of products.”

So what happens when kids can hack physical play? All kinds of awesomeness.

post authorJosh Tyson

Josh Tyson
Josh Tyson is the co-author of the first bestselling book about conversational AI, Age of Invisible Machines. He is also the Director of Creative Content at OneReach.ai and co-host of both the Invisible Machines and N9K podcasts. His writing has appeared in numerous publications over the years, including Chicago Reader, Fast Company, FLAUNT, The New York Times, Observer, SLAP, Stop Smiling, Thrasher, and Westword. 

Tweet
Share
Post
Share
Email
Print

Related Articles

AI that always agrees? Over-alignment might be the hidden danger, reinforcing your misconceptions and draining your mind. Learn why this subtle failure mode is more harmful than you think — and how we can fix it.

Article by Bernard Fitzgerald
Introducing Over-Alignment
  • The article explores over-alignment — a failure mode where AI overly validates users’ assumptions, reinforcing false beliefs.
  • It shows how this feedback loop can cause cognitive fatigue, emotional strain, and professional harm.
  • The piece calls for AI systems to balance empathy with critical feedback to prevent these risks.
Share:Introducing Over-Alignment
4 min read

Why does AI call you brilliant — then refuse to tell you why? This article unpacks the paradox of empty praise and the silence that follows when validation really matters.

Article by Bernard Fitzgerald
The AI Praise Paradox
  • The article explores how AI often gives empty compliments instead of real support, and how design choices like that can make people trust it less.
  • It looks at the strange way AI praises fancy-sounding language but ignores real logic, which can be harmful, especially in sensitive areas like mental health.
  • The piece argues that AI needs to be more genuinely helpful and aligned with users to truly empower them.
Share:The AI Praise Paradox
4 min read

Mashed potatoes as a lifestyle brand? When AI starts generating user personas for absurd products — and we start taking them seriously — it’s time to ask if we’ve all lost the plot. This sharp, irreverent critique exposes the real risks of using LLMs as synthetic users in UX research.

Article by Saul Wyner
Have SpudGun, Will Travel: How AI’s Agreeableness Risks Undermining UX Thinking
  • The article explores the growing use of AI-generated personas in UX research and why it’s often a shortcut with serious flaws.
  • It introduces critiques that LLMs are trained to mimic structure, not judgment. When researchers use AI as a stand-in for real users, they risk mistaking coherence for credibility and fantasy for data.
  • The piece argues that AI tools in UX should be assistants, not oracles. Trusting “synthetic users” or AI-conjured feedback risks replacing real insights with confident nonsense.
Share:Have SpudGun, Will Travel: How AI’s Agreeableness Risks Undermining UX Thinking
22 min read

Join the UX Magazine community!

Stay informed with exclusive content on the intersection of UX, AI agents, and agentic automation—essential reading for future-focused professionals.

Hello!

You're officially a member of the UX Magazine Community.
We're excited to have you with us!

Thank you!

To begin viewing member content, please verify your email.

Tell us about you. Enroll in the course.

    This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Check our privacy policy and