We stand with Ukraine and our team members from Ukraine.

The Community Of Over 640,000

Home ›› Business Value and ROI ›› 6 Key Questions to Guide International UX Research ›› small_16 ›› The Strategic and Tactical Aspects of UX Leadership

The Strategic and Tactical Aspects of UX Leadership

by John McGloon
5 min read
Share this post on
Tweet
Share
Post
Share
Email
Print

Save

Looking at UX management from a military perspective reveals a need for both tactical and strategic leadership roles.

User experience leaders face unique challenges based on the relative newness and breadth of our field. However, the importance of our work makes it crucial for UX leaders to find balance in the tactical and strategic work before us.

But what is strategic leadership and what is tactical leadership?

The difference between strategic and tactical can be illustrated by looking at the words’ military roots. A lieutenant on a hill planning a mission exemplifies the strategic view. A sergeant working with troops on the ground to execute the mission exemplifies the tactical.

Strategic UX Leadership

Senior managers, directors, and above, may find themselves cast in a more strategic role within their company (if they have the good fortune to have other leadership partners focused on the tactical). In UX terms, strategic leadership means looking at long-range plans, your UX department’s position in the company, funding models, and more.

At many companies, the newness of UX within the organization may mean you are engaged in UX evangelism, which we’ve all heard much about. In general, this means you must promote UX, train other senior leaders about the value of UX, and tie UX strategy into other corporate goals. This last point—alignment with company goals—helps ensure your team’s recognition as a corporate asset. Depending on your position, executive sponsorship can help here too.

Strategic leaders may also be involved in project selection, vendor management, UX process development and deployment, much more. So how can strategic managers achieve balance? Their planning and thinking must constantly answer the following questions:

  • How can I best support the leaders who report to me?
  • What relationships are strategic to cultivate across functions and stakeholders?
  • What executive sponsorship do I need and how do I obtain it?
  • How do I show UX alignment with the company strategy?

Like tactical managers, strategic leaders must also consider the areas where they need to improve technical proficiency and also focus on their own personal development goals.

Tactical UX Leadership

In UX, tactical managers have much important work to do. Whatever their title, these managers are the first-line leaders who work directly with UX designers, managing them in a hands-on capacity as direct reports. Depending on your corporate culture, this may mean serving those you manage. But regardless of culture, these managers must enable the work and execute the strategic goals given to them by their leaders. They must manage UX efforts like a project (or “project within a project”), though they may share that role with a lead UX designer. They must be good coaches and solve day-to-day problems.

Because of the breadth of our field, tactical managers must be technically competent—at least broadly—in the roles that UX designers fill: industrial design, interaction design, usability testing, user research, human factors engineering, visual design, and globalization to name a few. While they may not know these topics as well as the specialists they manage, they must know enough to help facilitate the work. (To test this concept, recall a time when you reported to someone who knew nothing about your work.)

The tactical UX manager must also “manage across.” For example, they may need to maintain liaison with project managers, quality managers, regulatory managers, and so on. The more cross-functional your company is, the more this aspect of the role expands.

The tactical manager must also “manage up.” They must manage their leaders to get the support their team needs to be successful. Again, the amount of time and effort this requires is directly proportional to the next level leader’s knowledge of and support for UX.

Tactical leaders also have a good deal of administrative responsibility. This includes human resources actions; getting the team hardware, software, and other equipment; time and expense reporting; training management; and evaluations. A certain degree of difficulty may be added if the people managed are a geographically distributed team.

As if this were not enough, UX tactical leaders must also keep current on their own personal development as well as that of their team. They may be formal mentors (or be formally mentored). They must work to keep their UX skills current and sharp. Faced with all of these challenges, how can tactical managers achieve balance? They need to plan their moments around these questions:

  • How can I best support my team’s day-to-day success?
  • What actions are critical for managing across functions and stakeholders?
  • How am I managing up?
  • What areas do I need to work on for managing technical staff?
  • What administrative work can I make routine so it does not get in the way of more important responsibilities?
  • What are my personal development goals?
  • How do I support my leaders’ strategy for UX?

Where the Two Meet

By now you’ve noticed that strategic and tactical are best split as two roles. One person will find it difficult to run back and forth trying to be a lieutenant on a hill and a sergeant working on the ground. Without a strategic view, your team will likely succeed in targets of opportunity but struggle to reach the next level. However, strategic alone—like a battle plan without execution—will offer no victories to build your team’s credibility.

In the best situations, leadership partners divide the activities and focus either on strategic or tactical. In these instances, the leaders need to connect regularly to communicate plans and stay in sync. This communication is essential to success. If you find yourself alone as a single leader, you’ll almost invariably find yourself in tactical mode. In this case, it’s crucial to set aside regular times to break from the tactical and focus on the strategic.

Conclusion

Solid UX leadership is a key factor in the success of a UX team. Without solid leadership, the best teams can hope for are isolated successes. Without it, teams face marginalization or dissolution. However, with balanced UX leadership we can create space for UX teams to thrive and show their value within our companies.

Image of battle reenactment courtesy Oskar Orsag/Shutterstock.com

post authorJohn McGloon

John McGloon,

John works with brilliant people who are helping accelerate the pace of engineering and science across countless disciplines. His focus has been web presentation of technical reference information—information which is used each time someone uses MathWorks software. He conducts research, creates user profiles (personas), creates task analyses and workflows, creates wireframes to illustrate information and interaction design, and conducts usability testing.

Formerly, John managed a team of User Experience designers who worked on interaction design, industrial design, and overall experience design for medical devices. He and his team have several patents for user interfaces for patient monitors. He also managed the Technical Communication group, which produces information and illustration to support device use.

He is a distinguished graduate of Bentley University’s Master of Science program in Human Factors in Information Design. He also holds a Master of Arts in Technical Communication from Boise State University. His undergraduate alma mater is Hobart College.

He is former Manager of Information Design for National Headquarters American Red Cross, Biomedical Services as well as former Manager of Information and Training for National Headquarters American Red Cross, Chapter Services Information Systems. He is a retired veteran of the United States Army.

 

John lives in Boston with his wife Shelley and son Ian. Three other sons—Patrick, Sean, and Ryan are pursuing their education and careers. He is an avid guitarist and music fan.

Tweet
Share
Post
Share
Email
Print

Related Articles

Building effective partnerships with PMs requires stepping outside of any frustration, ego, or resentment at being ignored, and building empathy. How to do that? Here is what we’re going to find out.

How To Research So PMs Will Listen
  • PMs are the most critical audiences for research, they are also often the hardest to convince, and the source of many of researchers’ frustrations and heartaches.
  • Building effective partnerships with PMs requires stepping outside of any frustration, ego, or resentment at being ignored, and building empathy.
  • The author shares:
    • Some practices of working with PMs
    • Questions to ask PMs and stakeholders
  • The baseline expectation setting:
    • Level set
    • Set guardrails based on your role
    • Ask for candid feedback and engagement
    • No surprises
  • When researchers and PMs are in conflict or in separate silos, neither role gets the value of the other, but strong researcher-pm partnerships can be game-changing for extending the strategic impact and influence of both design and research.
Share:How To Research So PMs Will Listen
6 min read
How to research so PMs will listen
How To Empower An Organization Through Design?
  • The author believes that the following reasons are why design/branding/marketing agencies end up damaging the image of design as a tool for getting results:
    • Lots of jargon and little to no action at a fundamental level.
    • Large companies with “foolproof” processes.
    • Fake cases and invented touch points
    • Romanticized view of consumers
  • In order to centralize an organization, designers need to map its interdependence relationships and understand how a project can strengthen all sectors in an equal way.
Share:How To Empower An Organization Through Design?
4 min read
How to empower an organization through design?

And, Is OneReach Under The Radar By Design?

Is OneReach AI The Tesla Of Conversational AI?
  • The author gives his perspective on OneReach.ai as the top scorer in the Gartner 2022 report.
  • The author believes OneReach.ai to be one of the most granular no-code environments that support an exceptional degree of fine tuning.
  • The author refers to the platform as an orchestration canvas, where multiple processes can be orchestrated for multi-dimensional customer service, and gives some details on how the platform works as a single front-door for customers.
  • Cobus Greyling explores two cautions from Gartner about the OneReach.ai platform.
  • He concludes that voice is a strength of OneReach.ai and the company has extreme focus on customer experience, and orchestrating experiences
Share:Is OneReach AI The Tesla Of Conversational AI?
4 min read
Is OneReach AI The Tesla Of Conversational AI?

This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Check our privacy policy and