Flag

We stand with Ukraine and our team members from Ukraine. Here are ways you can help

Get exclusive access to thought-provoking articles, bonus podcast content, and cutting-edge whitepapers. Become a member of the UX Magazine community today!

Home ›› Business Value and ROI ›› 6 Key Questions to Guide International UX Research ›› Coin Builds a Bridge, Can it Cross the Divide?

Coin Builds a Bridge, Can it Cross the Divide?

by Elias Parker
3 min read
Share this post on
Tweet
Share
Post
Share
Email
Print

Save

Coin, a smart credit card that promises to eliminate wallet-bulge, is an idea so smart it might help itself become obsolete.

A truly novel and exciting innovation crossed a lot of screens yesterday, as news of Coin broke.

Imagine, all of those credit cards, debit cards, gift cards, and loyalty cards making your wallet bulge loaded on to one smart card that can be run through virtually any card-reader. That’s Coin.

A button on the face of the Coin card toggles between all the cards you have stored. You load them onto the card using a card reader that plugs into your phone. Leave your coin behind and your phone alerts you once you’ve walked out of range. Pretty damn genius, and the video rollout makes a strong case for proliferation.

Coin will retail for $100 and the internal battery lasts for two years, making it a bit of investment. While Time magazine calls it an “ongoing expense” it’s fair to wonder if Coin in its current form will even exist in two years.

The problem Coin so sweetly solves is one that persists as the world tries to reconcile aging analog solutions with new digital capabilities. As a side effect of its awesomeness, Coin points out that a wallet full of credit cards feels a little more ridiculous every day in a world where smartphones can manage interactions far more complex that transferring credit data.

Like Square—which has liberated many small businesses by putting the power to run credit and debit cards literally into the palm of your hand—Coin is a solution so good that it paves the way to making itself obsolete.

In his recent UX Magazine article The Internet of Things and the Mythical Smart Fridge” Avi Itzkovitch imagines a world where products tagged with radio frequency identification (RFID) tags will make every single piece of merchandise a unique little information beacon.

“This technology will enable consumers to shop without standing in a checkout line,” he writes. “Simply by placing items into an RFID-enabled cart, the consumer will know the total cost of his or her groceries and will be able to pay with a swipe of a phone and a smile.”

This alternate reality, or one similar to it, doesn’t seem too far away on the horizon, and in the most comprehensive look at Coin so far, Nick Statt, a staff writer at CNET, brings this point to Coin CEO and founder Kanishk Prashar.

 

As for whether or not Coin will be part of the inevitable future in which payments are all consolidated and likely done so on our smartphones, Parashar is not so much short-sighted as he is focused “Right now the only thing I think about is delivering these and having them function,” [Prashar] said. “When it comes to the future, we’ll make a decision based on where we lay in the land. But we pack all the technology inside Coin to generate next-generation experiences.”

So while Coin’s future might be uncertain, with an idea this good, it’s not hard to imagine a pivot that keeps them in the game.

[google_ad:WITHINARTICLE_1_234X60_ALL]

Tweet
Share
Post
Share
Email
Print

Related Articles

Learn why your badges and streaks won’t wow kids raised on Minecraft.

Article by Montgomery Singman
Gamification 2.0. Beyond Points and Badges: Designing for Players, Not Metrics. Chapter 4: Special Considerations
  • The piece explains that young users, trained by thousands of hours of expert game design, can smell fake gamification at a hundred paces.
Share:Gamification 2.0. Beyond Points and Badges: Designing for Players, Not Metrics. Chapter 4: Special Considerations
4 min read

Learn about the most difficult challenge for designers in Agile.

Article by Paivi Salminen
The Part of Agile Designers Fear the Most: Imperfect Work
  • The article argues that designers aren’t afraid of shipping imperfect work; they’re afraid of imperfect work remaining imperfect because teams tend not to come back to improve what they’ve already shipped.
Share:The Part of Agile Designers Fear the Most: Imperfect Work
4 min read

Find out why slapping gamification on your product without first selecting a genre is the silent killer of your engagement strategy.

Article by Montgomery Singman
Gamification 2.0. Beyond Points and Badges: Designing for Players, Not Metrics. Chapter 3: The Framework
  • The article argues that “adding gamification” without selecting a genre is akin to “adding music” without referencing jazz or heavy metal: a category error that most product teams never realize they’re making.
  • It contends that different game genres are not just aesthetic choices; they are fundamentally different motivational architectures, and mapping your product to the wrong one is why most gamification fails.
Share:Gamification 2.0. Beyond Points and Badges: Designing for Players, Not Metrics. Chapter 3: The Framework
19 min read

Join the UX Magazine community!

Stay informed with exclusive content on the intersection of UX, AI agents, and agentic automation—essential reading for future-focused professionals.

Hello!

You're officially a member of the UX Magazine Community.
We're excited to have you with us!

Thank you!

To begin viewing member content, please verify your email.

Get Paid to Test AI Products

Earn an average of $100 per test by reviewing AI-first product experiences and sharing your feedback.

    Tell us about you. Enroll in the course.

      This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Check our privacy policy and