Flag

We stand with Ukraine and our team members from Ukraine. Here are ways you can help

Get exclusive access to thought-provoking articles, bonus podcast content, and cutting-edge whitepapers. Become a member of the UX Magazine community today!

Home ›› Business Value and ROI ›› 6 Key Questions to Guide International UX Research ›› POP UX! Clued Into Curiosity

POP UX! Clued Into Curiosity

by Andrew Zusman
3 min read
Share this post on
Tweet
Share
Post
Share
Email
Print

Save

Clue, the classic murder-mystery board game, shows designers how to create an information gap and a narrative that leads users to the other side.

On a dark and stormy night, six colorful people gather in a country manor home, each holding a deadly weapon. Before the evening’s end, there will be a murder and it will be up to you to solve it!

Clue, or Cluedo outside of the United States, is a board game based on the classic whodunit murder-mystery. Clue provides the same enjoyment readers get out of reading murder mysteries by playing on a powerful but often underutilized desire in Web, tablet, and mobile design: curiosity. Curiosity can help user experience designers drive user action by creating an information gap and then directing users on how to fill it in.

User experience designers strive to make their designs clear, understandable, and simple because the concept of usability hinges on users being able to instantly recognize what to do and how to behave. Adding an element of curiosity encourages designers to develop the unknown rather than to make clear what is already known.

A gap in information can create a desire to fill in what’s missing. User experience designers can capitalize on this desire by designing a specific user flow that will lead users to the information that fills in the gap. Cultivating this information gap and flow can be a powerful weapon in the user experience design arsenal.

Clue has an incredibly simple interface: three cards representing the murderer, the weapon, and the location of the murder are selected and hidden at the beginning of the game. The players move from room to room and ask questions to try and determine which cards other players have in order to make an educated guess about the secret cards.

There is a gap in the user’s information: Who is the murderer? What weapon did they use? In which room did they commit the crime? A specific user flow allows the users to find the answers: move from room to room, ask other players about their cards, and fill in the information gap through a process of elimination. Just as Clue has a narrative built around an information gap, Clouds Over Cuba and Only Because We Can are digital experiences that capitalize on a similarly mysterious narrative.

Clouds Over Cuba is a web- and mobile-based documentary that explores the Cuban Missile Crisis and what might have occurred had it boiled over in to war. The site creates an information gap between what users know about the historical events, what they might not know about these events, and a possible alternative outcome. This information gap, much like trying to determine the murderer in Clue, pushes users to continue through the documentary. Even rolling over the “Start Documentary” button on the main screen illuminates this information gap, sparking a high level of curiosity with the image of a demolished U.S. Capitol building.

Similarly, the website Only Because We Can sparks curiosity with a narrative. The site is an interactive video that has an intriguing storyline. The story captures the user’s interest, and before they realize it, they’ve watched and interacted with several minutes of a clothing commercial. Viewers want to know how the story will end—much like Clue players, they want the secret cards to be revealed.

Curiosity can drive an experience in the direction that the designer chooses. Considering what information might be important to the user and then using that information in carrot-and-stick fashion can lead users through specific flows. Harnessing the unknown, rather than explicitly stating information, can generate curiosity and spark interest in a website, application, or product.

What other ways does curiosity aid user experience design? What other websites or applications use an information gap and narrative structure similar to the gameplay in Clue to drive user flows? Please share your thoughts and ideas.

post authorAndrew Zusman

Andrew Zusman
Andrew Zusman is a user experience designer at Inkod-Hypera and the creator of the 52 Designers project. Andrew is also the writer of a popular user experience design blog. He lives in Tel-Aviv, Israel with his girlfriend Natasha and their dog Indy.

Tweet
Share
Post
Share
Email
Print

Related Articles

AI that always agrees? Over-alignment might be the hidden danger, reinforcing your misconceptions and draining your mind. Learn why this subtle failure mode is more harmful than you think — and how we can fix it.

Article by Bernard Fitzgerald
Introducing Over-Alignment
  • The article explores over-alignment — a failure mode where AI overly validates users’ assumptions, reinforcing false beliefs.
  • It shows how this feedback loop can cause cognitive fatigue, emotional strain, and professional harm.
  • The piece calls for AI systems to balance empathy with critical feedback to prevent these risks.
Share:Introducing Over-Alignment
4 min read

AI agents are getting smarter — but can they truly work together? Meet MCP, the open-source protocol quietly reshaping how machines connect, collaborate, and get things done.

Article by Josh Tyson
What to Know About Model Context Protocol (MCP)
  • The article introduces MCP — a new way to help AI agents easily work with business tools.
  • It shows how MCP could change how we use software by letting AI control all our tools through one interface.
  • The article sees MCP as a big step toward building smarter, more flexible AI systems in the future.
Share:What to Know About Model Context Protocol (MCP)
5 min read

Why does AI call you brilliant — then refuse to tell you why? This article unpacks the paradox of empty praise and the silence that follows when validation really matters.

Article by Bernard Fitzgerald
The AI Praise Paradox
  • The article explores how AI often gives empty compliments instead of real support, and how design choices like that can make people trust it less.
  • It looks at the strange way AI praises fancy-sounding language but ignores real logic, which can be harmful, especially in sensitive areas like mental health.
  • The piece argues that AI needs to be more genuinely helpful and aligned with users to truly empower them.
Share:The AI Praise Paradox
4 min read

Join the UX Magazine community!

Stay informed with exclusive content on the intersection of UX, AI agents, and agentic automation—essential reading for future-focused professionals.

Hello!

You're officially a member of the UX Magazine Community.
We're excited to have you with us!

Thank you!

To begin viewing member content, please verify your email.

Tell us about you. Enroll in the course.

    This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Check our privacy policy and