Flag

We stand with Ukraine and our team members from Ukraine. Here are ways you can help

Get exclusive access to thought-provoking articles, bonus podcast content, and cutting-edge whitepapers. Become a member of the UX Magazine community today!

Home ›› Agile and Iterative Process ›› The Power of Disciplined Simplification

The Power of Disciplined Simplification

by Allegra Burnette
4 min read
Share this post on
Tweet
Share
Post
Share
Email
Print

Save

By investing in focus, fluency, and magic, established firms can get up to speed with today’s CX leaders, embracing disciplined simplification to build innovative experiences.

Over the last few years, we’ve seen a noted shift in the quality of customer experiences across industries, as well as an increased emphasis on outside-in thinking. That’s good news for customers, but bad news for companies still seen as “just average” compared to brands that stand out with truly great experiences. Startups that focus on the importance of design as well as the customer have succeeded in attracting loyal followings while shaking up the status quo, and created jobs for thousands along the way. The pressure on established companies to examine their goals, processes, culture, and approach—and re-orient them around the customer—is now greater than ever.

What’s holding back the bulk of firms when it comes to shifting from a good to great customer experience? Most lack the agility needed to go beyond surface-level simplification—they are stymied by ecosystem complexity and blinded by inside-out cost accounting. The result is innovation paralysis, fragmented experiences, and in turn, eroded brand value.

But let’s face it. Well-known disruptors like Uber, Airbnb, and Etsy haven’t set a new standard for experience design just because of their advantage of starting with a clean slate. Nor have recent customer experience standouts like Delta and T-Mobile moved the needle forward by being simply slightly better than their competitors.

These brands have made significant strides in experience delivery by putting the customer at the center of their business-decision making and by taking a disciplined and iterative approach to simplicity-driven innovation. As Daria Shualy of daPulse puts it, “Simple is not your starting point; it’s the end result of a long perfection process. You reach perfection by building, measuring, improving, or removing.”

So how can other firms begin to catch up and systematically deliver the types of experiences customers have come to expect? In order to move customer experience out of the repair phase, and shift from good to great, companies need to embrace:

Focus

Rather than diluting resources and attention across multiple initiatives, obsessive focus on a singular driving priority shapes every other decision.

To be clear, focus doesn’t mean doing one thing and one thing only. But it does mean having a guiding customer-centric purpose or goal, and orienting current priorities around that. In the case of Delta, the focus is eliminating canceled flights, which leads to purchasing its own fuel sources in order to remove that obstacle to getting flights off the ground.

To achieve this focus requires a mixture of requirements. It’s not only about having a boss with budget and a clear alignment statement. To fully achieve focus, firms must also have a fresh target, looking beyond the immediate competitive landscape for inspiration, and aim. For instance, the Brooklyn Museum recently eliminated a number of its acclaimed online projects in order to realign its efforts to a core local audience, and focus resources where they could have more impact.

Fluency

Bringing together CX and UX while integrating data and intuition delivers experiences that both conform to the end user’s view of the world and transforms the familiar. In order for something to feel easy, it needs to be understandable. Take for example a recent study where consumers were asked to identify whether or not a site was beautiful. Users scored visually complex websites lower than simple ones.

To offer customers this cognitive fluency, brands will need to embark on customer and product research, demand constant testing, evaluation, and iteration, and perhaps most importantly, align cross-functional teams with the same end goal in sight. Why? Achieving cognitive fluency involves multiple skills and inputs, so UX, interaction design, and visual design must come together—ultimately shortening the path to breakthrough insights.

Magic

Magical experiences are created when the right thing happens at the right time in the right format in a way that makes the interface disappear and brings the experience to the forefront.

We all know Apple’s products aren’t just magically created. Yet, when we bring home a new Apple product, it certainly feels like magic in our hands. But that customer surprise and delight is the result of a lot of focus, reduction, exploration, and integration between software and hardware. Today’s businesses are increasingly designing systems rather than destinations and experiences rather than individual screens. The magic comes from getting the right configuration in the right context—when the complexity is hidden from the user, the experience feels intuitive, and the goals are reached.

Magic is achieved with a very practical mix of data, design, and interaction

Magic is achieved with a very practical mix of data (to drive experience decisions), design (to elevate that experience), and interaction (to activate it and bring it to life). In fact, as a testament to the important role that design plays in CX innovation and creative problem solving, design is now a priority at the C-level, exemplified by designer-led companies like Airbnb, by design-centric products like Nest, and by new design partners in VC companies like Google Ventures, KPCB, and Khosla Ventures.

With these three investments in mind—focus, fluency, and magic—established firms will begin to stay apace with today’s CX leaders, embracing disciplined simplification to build next generation, innovative customer experiences. Only then will we see the next CX shift, from good to great.

To learn more about the power of disciplined simplification, visit the Forrester research report here.

 

Image of ink and water courtesy Shutterstock.

post authorAllegra Burnette

Allegra Burnette
Allegra Burnette is a Principal Analyst at Forrester Research, serving customer experience professionals. Prior to joining Forrester in May 2014, Allegra was the creative director of digital media at The Museum of Modern Art, New York, where she oversaw design and production across interpretive technology, including the museum's website, MoMA.org, as well as mobile apps and sites, kiosks, and other digital displays.

Tweet
Share
Post
Share
Email
Print

Related Articles

AI that always agrees? Over-alignment might be the hidden danger, reinforcing your misconceptions and draining your mind. Learn why this subtle failure mode is more harmful than you think — and how we can fix it.

Article by Bernard Fitzgerald
Introducing Over-Alignment
  • The article explores over-alignment — a failure mode where AI overly validates users’ assumptions, reinforcing false beliefs.
  • It shows how this feedback loop can cause cognitive fatigue, emotional strain, and professional harm.
  • The piece calls for AI systems to balance empathy with critical feedback to prevent these risks.
Share:Introducing Over-Alignment
4 min read

Why does AI call you brilliant — then refuse to tell you why? This article unpacks the paradox of empty praise and the silence that follows when validation really matters.

Article by Bernard Fitzgerald
The AI Praise Paradox
  • The article explores how AI often gives empty compliments instead of real support, and how design choices like that can make people trust it less.
  • It looks at the strange way AI praises fancy-sounding language but ignores real logic, which can be harmful, especially in sensitive areas like mental health.
  • The piece argues that AI needs to be more genuinely helpful and aligned with users to truly empower them.
Share:The AI Praise Paradox
4 min read

Mashed potatoes as a lifestyle brand? When AI starts generating user personas for absurd products — and we start taking them seriously — it’s time to ask if we’ve all lost the plot. This sharp, irreverent critique exposes the real risks of using LLMs as synthetic users in UX research.

Article by Saul Wyner
Have SpudGun, Will Travel: How AI’s Agreeableness Risks Undermining UX Thinking
  • The article explores the growing use of AI-generated personas in UX research and why it’s often a shortcut with serious flaws.
  • It introduces critiques that LLMs are trained to mimic structure, not judgment. When researchers use AI as a stand-in for real users, they risk mistaking coherence for credibility and fantasy for data.
  • The piece argues that AI tools in UX should be assistants, not oracles. Trusting “synthetic users” or AI-conjured feedback risks replacing real insights with confident nonsense.
Share:Have SpudGun, Will Travel: How AI’s Agreeableness Risks Undermining UX Thinking
22 min read

Join the UX Magazine community!

Stay informed with exclusive content on the intersection of UX, AI agents, and agentic automation—essential reading for future-focused professionals.

Hello!

You're officially a member of the UX Magazine Community.
We're excited to have you with us!

Thank you!

To begin viewing member content, please verify your email.

Tell us about you. Enroll in the course.

    This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Check our privacy policy and