Flag

We stand with Ukraine and our team members from Ukraine. Here are ways you can help

Get exclusive access to thought-provoking articles, bonus podcast content, and cutting-edge whitepapers. Become a member of the UX Magazine community today!

Home ›› Agile and Iterative Process ›› The Power of Disciplined Simplification

The Power of Disciplined Simplification

by Allegra Burnette
4 min read
Share this post on
Tweet
Share
Post
Share
Email
Print

Save

By investing in focus, fluency, and magic, established firms can get up to speed with today’s CX leaders, embracing disciplined simplification to build innovative experiences.

Over the last few years, we’ve seen a noted shift in the quality of customer experiences across industries, as well as an increased emphasis on outside-in thinking. That’s good news for customers, but bad news for companies still seen as “just average” compared to brands that stand out with truly great experiences. Startups that focus on the importance of design as well as the customer have succeeded in attracting loyal followings while shaking up the status quo, and created jobs for thousands along the way. The pressure on established companies to examine their goals, processes, culture, and approach—and re-orient them around the customer—is now greater than ever.

What’s holding back the bulk of firms when it comes to shifting from a good to great customer experience? Most lack the agility needed to go beyond surface-level simplification—they are stymied by ecosystem complexity and blinded by inside-out cost accounting. The result is innovation paralysis, fragmented experiences, and in turn, eroded brand value.

But let’s face it. Well-known disruptors like Uber, Airbnb, and Etsy haven’t set a new standard for experience design just because of their advantage of starting with a clean slate. Nor have recent customer experience standouts like Delta and T-Mobile moved the needle forward by being simply slightly better than their competitors.

These brands have made significant strides in experience delivery by putting the customer at the center of their business-decision making and by taking a disciplined and iterative approach to simplicity-driven innovation. As Daria Shualy of daPulse puts it, “Simple is not your starting point; it’s the end result of a long perfection process. You reach perfection by building, measuring, improving, or removing.”

So how can other firms begin to catch up and systematically deliver the types of experiences customers have come to expect? In order to move customer experience out of the repair phase, and shift from good to great, companies need to embrace:

Focus

Rather than diluting resources and attention across multiple initiatives, obsessive focus on a singular driving priority shapes every other decision.

To be clear, focus doesn’t mean doing one thing and one thing only. But it does mean having a guiding customer-centric purpose or goal, and orienting current priorities around that. In the case of Delta, the focus is eliminating canceled flights, which leads to purchasing its own fuel sources in order to remove that obstacle to getting flights off the ground.

To achieve this focus requires a mixture of requirements. It’s not only about having a boss with budget and a clear alignment statement. To fully achieve focus, firms must also have a fresh target, looking beyond the immediate competitive landscape for inspiration, and aim. For instance, the Brooklyn Museum recently eliminated a number of its acclaimed online projects in order to realign its efforts to a core local audience, and focus resources where they could have more impact.

Fluency

Bringing together CX and UX while integrating data and intuition delivers experiences that both conform to the end user’s view of the world and transforms the familiar. In order for something to feel easy, it needs to be understandable. Take for example a recent study where consumers were asked to identify whether or not a site was beautiful. Users scored visually complex websites lower than simple ones.

To offer customers this cognitive fluency, brands will need to embark on customer and product research, demand constant testing, evaluation, and iteration, and perhaps most importantly, align cross-functional teams with the same end goal in sight. Why? Achieving cognitive fluency involves multiple skills and inputs, so UX, interaction design, and visual design must come together—ultimately shortening the path to breakthrough insights.

Magic

Magical experiences are created when the right thing happens at the right time in the right format in a way that makes the interface disappear and brings the experience to the forefront.

We all know Apple’s products aren’t just magically created. Yet, when we bring home a new Apple product, it certainly feels like magic in our hands. But that customer surprise and delight is the result of a lot of focus, reduction, exploration, and integration between software and hardware. Today’s businesses are increasingly designing systems rather than destinations and experiences rather than individual screens. The magic comes from getting the right configuration in the right context—when the complexity is hidden from the user, the experience feels intuitive, and the goals are reached.

Magic is achieved with a very practical mix of data, design, and interaction

Magic is achieved with a very practical mix of data (to drive experience decisions), design (to elevate that experience), and interaction (to activate it and bring it to life). In fact, as a testament to the important role that design plays in CX innovation and creative problem solving, design is now a priority at the C-level, exemplified by designer-led companies like Airbnb, by design-centric products like Nest, and by new design partners in VC companies like Google Ventures, KPCB, and Khosla Ventures.

With these three investments in mind—focus, fluency, and magic—established firms will begin to stay apace with today’s CX leaders, embracing disciplined simplification to build next generation, innovative customer experiences. Only then will we see the next CX shift, from good to great.

To learn more about the power of disciplined simplification, visit the Forrester research report here.

 

Image of ink and water courtesy Shutterstock.

post authorAllegra Burnette

Allegra Burnette
Allegra Burnette is a Principal Analyst at Forrester Research, serving customer experience professionals. Prior to joining Forrester in May 2014, Allegra was the creative director of digital media at The Museum of Modern Art, New York, where she oversaw design and production across interpretive technology, including the museum's website, MoMA.org, as well as mobile apps and sites, kiosks, and other digital displays.

Tweet
Share
Post
Share
Email
Print

Related Articles

Design isn’t just about looks; it’s about human nature. Discover how simple psychological principles can make your product stand out.

Article by Canvs.in
Designing with Psychology to Make Products Stick
  • The article shows how psychology, not just features, makes products memorable.
  • It highlights principles like delight, internal triggers, and false consensus as keys to stickiness.
  • It argues that strong design balances trade-offs and roots choices in real user behavior.
Share:Designing with Psychology to Make Products Stick
7 min read

What makes players keep coming back? This piece explores the psychology of hot streaks — how momentum, perception, and smart design can turn short wins into lasting engagement.

Article by Montgomery Singman
The Psychology of Hot Streak Game Design: How to Keep Players Coming Back Every Day Without Shame
  • The article shows how hot streaks tap into players’ psychology, turning momentum into motivation.
  • It highlights the hot-hand fallacy, where players overestimate their chances of continued success.
  • The piece argues that ethical streak design should enhance engagement without exploiting addictive behavior.
Share:The Psychology of Hot Streak Game Design: How to Keep Players Coming Back Every Day Without Shame
26 min read

Trusting AI isn’t the goal — relying on it is. This article explores why human trust and AI reliance are worlds apart, and what UX designers should focus on to make AI feel dependable, not human.

Article by Verena Seibert-Giller
The Psychology of Trust in AI: Why “Relying on AI” Matters More than “Trusting It”
  • The article argues that “reliance,” not “trust,” is the right way to think about users’ relationship with AI.
  • It explains that human trust and AI reliance are driven by different psychological mechanisms.
  • The piece highlights that predictability, transparency, and control make users more willing to rely on AI.
  • It concludes that users don’t need to trust AI as a partner — only rely on it as a dependable tool.
Share:The Psychology of Trust in AI: Why “Relying on AI” Matters More than “Trusting It”
4 min read

Join the UX Magazine community!

Stay informed with exclusive content on the intersection of UX, AI agents, and agentic automation—essential reading for future-focused professionals.

Hello!

You're officially a member of the UX Magazine Community.
We're excited to have you with us!

Thank you!

To begin viewing member content, please verify your email.

Tell us about you. Enroll in the course.

    This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Check our privacy policy and