Flag

We stand with Ukraine and our team members from Ukraine. Here are ways you can help

Get exclusive access to thought-provoking articles, bonus podcast content, and cutting-edge whitepapers. Become a member of the UX Magazine community today!

Home ›› Accessibility ›› Stop Helping Me, Google Calendar Autosuggest #wtfUX

Stop Helping Me, Google Calendar Autosuggest #wtfUX

by John Boykin
2 min read
Share this post on
Tweet
Share
Post
Share
Email
Print

Save

Had Google thought more about probability than about throwing in their existing technology just because they could, they would have left autosuggest out.

My client’s office in San Francisco has a corner called the UX area. Here’s what happens as I type “UX area” in Google Calendar as the location for a meeting:

What are the chances any of those are what I mean?

Autosuggest, which is such a great help for searching the web, is a worse-than-useless distraction in a calendar app. Why? Probability.

Searching the web is likely to be an expansive activity: You often don’t know exactly what you’re looking for, so you will probably welcome a discovery from the far-flung universe of possibilities.

But creating an entry in your calendar is the opposite. It’s a narrow, personal, intimate activity. You know precisely what you mean and want. A calendar entry reflects the comparatively small circle of people and topics and places you personally deal with.

So your act of creating an entry in your calendar is highly unlikely to be helped by intrusions from the far-flung universe of possibilities. And even when Google Calendar autosuggests something theoretically useful like people from my contacts list or history, that only slows me down. I can finish typing “Mike Starbucks” much faster – even with my thumbs – than I can redirect my attention to an autosuggestion list that changes with every character I type, scan and scroll through the many misses to find a hit (if any), and then tap/click that listing.

And don’t even get me started about the times Google Calendar defaults to a prepopulated date in the past…

Had Google thought more about probability than about throwing in their existing technology just because they could, they would have left autosuggest out, making Google Calendar actually more efficient to use.

Keep these coming. Send them to us via Twitter or Facebook using the hastag #wtfUX or email them to: [email protected] with “#wtfUX” in the subject line. Include as much context as you can, so we get a full understanding of what the f%*k went wrong.

Image of man with phone courtesy of Shutterstock.

post authorJohn Boykin

John Boykin
John Boykin answers to user experience designer, information architect, interaction designer, information designer, and UX researcher. He’s been doing all of the above for over 10 years. Clients include Walmart, Macy’s and Bloomingdale’s, Blue Shield, Bank of America, Visa, Symantec, NBC, HP, Janus, Prosper, and Mitsubishi Motors. His site, wayfind.com, will tell you more than you want to know.

Tweet
Share
Post
Share
Email
Print

Related Articles

Design systems were meant to streamline design and boost creativity — so why do they often do the opposite?

Article by Itai Vonshak
The Broken Promises of Design Systems: Why Following the Rules Won’t Get You to Great Products
  • The article questions whether design systems really help create better products.
  • It explains how they often limit creativity, are hard to maintain, and don’t scale well.
  • It suggests we need more flexible, AI-powered tools to support great design.
Share:The Broken Promises of Design Systems: Why Following the Rules Won’t Get You to Great Products
3 min read

A conversation between a blind digital accessibility consultant and a UX designer.

Article by Tamara Sredojevic
Being Blind on the Internet
  • The article explores what it’s like to navigate the internet as a blind person.
  • It shows how even basic tasks become difficult due to poor design, missing labels, and inaccessible interfaces.
  • It argues that true accessibility requires empathy, inclusion, and designing with blind users from the start.
Share:Being Blind on the Internet
14 min read

If we can automate a 787, why not an entire company? Discover how conversational AI and intelligent ecosystems are reshaping the future of work.

Article by Robb Wilson
You Can Automate a 787 — You Can Automate a Company
  • The article explores how automating a plane cockpit led to deeper insights about business automation.
  • It shows how conversational AI and agent-based systems can reduce cognitive load and improve decision-making.
  • It argues that organizations need intelligent ecosystems — not just tools like ChatGPT — to thrive in the age of automation.
Share:You Can Automate a 787 — You Can Automate a Company
8 min read

Join the UX Magazine community!

Stay informed with exclusive content on the intersection of UX, AI agents, and agentic automation—essential reading for future-focused professionals.

Hello!

You're officially a member of the UX Magazine Community.
We're excited to have you with us!

Thank you!

To begin viewing member content, please verify your email.

Tell us about you. Enroll in the course.

    This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Check our privacy policy and