Flag

We stand with Ukraine and our team members from Ukraine. Here are ways you can help

Get exclusive access to thought-provoking articles, bonus podcast content, and cutting-edge whitepapers. Become a member of the UX Magazine community today!

Home ›› Design Theory ›› Mentorship Match — How a simple LinkedIn feature can boost diversity

Mentorship Match — How a simple LinkedIn feature can boost diversity

by Julia Kornmann
5 min read
Share this post on
Tweet
Share
Post
Share
Email
Print

Save

LeadBannerLinkedIn

Diversity is tied to culture and financial performance

In Germany, men still make up more than 90% of executive board members and only 9,3% are women. — AllBright 2019

LinkedIn offers immense potential for diversity

LinkedIn

Source: LinkedIn

Personally, I am an advocate for meaningful user engagement but if we only engage with our own bubble, aren’t we disregarding the great potential for diverse interactions LinkedIn offers us?

How to tap into LinkedIn’s diverse user base: a feature design challenge

Junior Professionals
Senior Professionals

There is a problem that no competitor solves

We have observed that LinkedIn is not granting accessibility and the curated matching of junior and senior professionals which is causing a lack of meaningful networking and professional success.

Comparison Chart

Market Positioning Mape of the LinkedIn mentorship feature

Rolling up the sleeves, designing the solution

Happy path

Happy path of senior professionals

Wireframes

Mid-fidelity wireframes

Feature

Style tile LinkedIn mentorship feature

App
Example screen

Prototype LinkedIn Mentorship Feature

What comes next

Final thoughts

post authorJulia Kornmann

Julia Kornmann

I’m Julia, a curious human being currently making trouble as a UX designer. Drawing from years of business and entrepreneurship experience, I came to understand that only empathetic and user-focused decisions lead to sustainable success. Thus, I am driving user-centered design aligned with business needs. 

Tweet
Share
Post
Share
Email
Print

Related Articles

Explore why psychology, not pixels, decides whether users flow effortlessly or freeze in confusion, and how understanding cognition changes everything about UX design.

Article by Tushar Deshmukh
The Cortex-First Approach: Why UX Starts Before the Screen
  • The article explains why UX design fails when it ignores what users’ brains are already doing before they even see the interface or click the first button.
  • The piece shows how aligning design with users’ mental models and emotional states creates effortless experiences, while violating them causes hesitation even in “perfect” interfaces.
  • It outlines the Cortex-First approach, showing how great UX starts by understanding cognitive patterns, emotional responses, and subconscious expectations rather than visual aesthetics.
Share:The Cortex-First Approach: Why UX Starts Before the Screen
6 min read

Trusting AI isn’t the goal — relying on it is. This article explores why human trust and AI reliance are worlds apart, and what UX designers should focus on to make AI feel dependable, not human.

Article by Verena Seibert-Giller
The Psychology of Trust in AI: Why “Relying on AI” Matters More than “Trusting It”
  • The article argues that “reliance,” not “trust,” is the right way to think about users’ relationship with AI.
  • It explains that human trust and AI reliance are driven by different psychological mechanisms.
  • The piece highlights that predictability, transparency, and control make users more willing to rely on AI.
  • It concludes that users don’t need to trust AI as a partner — only rely on it as a dependable tool.
Share:The Psychology of Trust in AI: Why “Relying on AI” Matters More than “Trusting It”
4 min read

Designing for AI goes beyond buttons and screens; it’s about building invisible connections of trust, understanding, and psychology between humans and technology.

Article by Anina Botha
Designing the Invisible between humans and technology: My Journey Blending Design and Behavioral Psychology
  • The article explores the shift from designing visible interfaces to shaping invisible psychological connections between humans and AI.
  • It emphasizes that trust, reliability, and understanding are more critical design challenges than traditional UI or UX elements.
  • The piece argues that AI design is less about predefined flows and more about building relationships grounded in psychology and human behavior.
Share:Designing the Invisible between humans and technology: My Journey Blending Design and Behavioral Psychology
4 min read

Join the UX Magazine community!

Stay informed with exclusive content on the intersection of UX, AI agents, and agentic automation—essential reading for future-focused professionals.

Hello!

You're officially a member of the UX Magazine Community.
We're excited to have you with us!

Thank you!

To begin viewing member content, please verify your email.

Get Paid to Test AI Products

Earn an average of $100 per test by reviewing AI-first product experiences and sharing your feedback.

    Tell us about you. Enroll in the course.

      This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Check our privacy policy and