We stand with Ukraine and our team members from Ukraine. Here are ways you can help

Home ›› Business Value and ROI ›› 6 Key Questions to Guide International UX Research ›› Lean Strategy for UX Design

Lean Strategy for UX Design

by David Gillis
7 min read
Share this post on


When it comes to delivering viable solutions, a lithe and muscular approach outpaces one that is weighed-down with too much information.

Last Fall, we were working on a product for a client whose industry was undergoing substantial disruption. The project involved a robust upfront discovery piece running the full gamut of customer insights, competitive analysis, and even business model exploration. We undertook lots of primary and secondary research, thoroughly analyzed the data, and generated a nicely synthesized plan. When we presented our carefully crafted strategy to the client, they were happy and agreed to have us go ahead with the design phase.

Then circumstances caused the brief to change. Massively. And in many respects, we were back to square one. We had done all of this work to get senior client stakeholders to buy into our initial vision and plan of attack, and we didn’t have the time to do it again.

Huddling together as a team, we decided to try something that seemed bold at the time. We realized that, even in light of the changed brief, we still had convictions about what needed to be done. We had some early design exploration and had a handful of data points and rationale that we believed were compelling. So we pivoted, and called the client into our office to pitch them on what we had in mind.

This time around, there was no PowerPoint deck. No highly refined proprietary insights. No shiny new personas, design principles, or other polished artifacts of strategic synthesis. Just a high-level model of the problem as we saw it, the solutions that we thought were in reach, and some quick sketches of how this all might play out in design. We stood at the whiteboard and within about 15 minutes, had gained consensus and a fresh mandate for our designers to move ahead with.

In retrospect, what seemed at the time to be an almost reckless attempt to salvage a project in distress turned out to be the right course of action. We were trying to develop a minimum viable product; but it took a near crisis to realize that what we also needed was a minimum viable strategy. Over time, I’ve become convinced that this approach to UX planning—let’s call it “lean strategy”—is more often than not a better option.

What Lean Strategy Means

Lean strategy in UX design means getting to a simple, actionable statement about what problem we are going to solve for the user as soon as possible, so that the design process can proceed. In fact, lean strategy often happens in concert with design, enabling us to be more adaptive and to more easily apply our thinking to our designs. It’s about being less precious and profligate with our decks and deliverables, freeing us up to bring greater clarity and focus to our ideas. It’s strategy in motion, pressing us forward rather than holding us back until everything has been figured out and proven with mathematical certainty.

What Took So Long?

So what took us so long to discover the merits of lean strategy? I think there are three main factors that have traditionally held designers back.

1. We don’t actually know what strategy is.

Think fast: What is strategy? Business development consultant Blair Enns has a personal hobby of collecting responses to this question. A few choice examples: “Strategy is how you do what you do” … “Strategy is an idea that describes a journey to a position of advantage” … “Strategy is how you’re going to be unique, and use that uniqueness to competitive advantage.”

Note that these definitions do not necessarily entail a regimented methodology of inquiry, copious amounts of data, or even highly refined proprietary insights. Those may be important depending on the circumstances, but they are not necessarily essential. Rather, strategy is about the organizing principle that gives our actions and decisions meaning and purpose. It is the ideational focus that lets us set priorities and make intentional choices. To borrow a phrase from Soren Kierkegaard, (that pioneer of lean strategy), “purity of heart is to will one thing.” No matter how many data points or insights you have, if you don’t know what that “one thing” is that you’re trying to accomplish, I would suggest that you don’t have a strategy.

2. We aren’t incentivized to do it!

This is especially true for UX practitioners in the client services industry, although I’ve seen many overwrought business cases and strategic plans generated internally as well.

We often feel pressured to develop and deliver exhaustive, elaborate strategies because we get compensated/credited for the time we spend making them. Lean and adaptive strategy efforts may even be perceived as disruptive inside of businesses that want predictive power and certainty. But adding more complexity to our process can often work against our ability to reliably assess and predict. Moving to a value-based compensation model can help incentivize us to be effective rather than excessive in how and where we invest our time and energy.

3. We lack confidence and overcompensate.

Sometimes over-delivering on strategy happens as a sort of unconscious hedge. We’re working on a problem and we don’t know what the solution is, so we generate a lot of smoke to obscure the uncertainty. This can result in big, complicated strategic reports and decks that appear to be highly rigorous and substantive, yet ultimately take us nowhere. In fact, experimental evidence shows that we are hard-wired to over-evaluate the perceived utility of additional information. Information bias causes us to believe that we need more information before committing to a decision, even if that extra information is irrelevant.

Pushing back against this information bias requires discipline and courage. Ultimately, the results from this push back can be better communication and more engagement with those we are trying to persuade. Consultants with McKinsey are trained to put their main findings and recommendations at the very beginning of their decks. This is because C-level executives don’t have time to deal with all of the material; rather, they selectively engage with specific items in a more interactive way. Lean strategy means getting to the point sooner so that our clients and stakeholders can quickly become active in the process.

How do we practice lean strategy?

Here are some good starting points:

Distill what you deliver into its simplest possible form

Complexity is truly the enemy when it comes to lean strategy. In fact, according to Bain & Company’s co-head of global strategy Chris Zook, complexity is generally one of the most disruptive forces in modern business. Having an extremely clear articulation of differentiation, or creating a handful of “non-negotiables” that follow from this differentiation can be very powerful elements in a successful lean strategy.

Develop a reusable framework

It can be difficult to formulate and deliver lean strategy if you have to work from first principles every time. That’s why Blair Enns (who was mentioned earlier in this article) advocates developing a framework that you can work from in a repeatable fashion. Having an established point of view or a working theory to start from—so long as you’re conscious of the bias that comes along with it—is a great way to interrogate a brief and start sparking new ideas right away.

Go to a playbook model

Consider developing a strategy “playbook” that gives your team ready-to-hand tools and methods (the more lightweight, the better) to use selectively depending on the circumstances. The key here is that rather than a systematic, exhaustive strategic process, a playbook lets you use only those tools that fit the job. This idea works particularly well in conjunction with “developing a reusable framework.”

Fuse strategy and design exploration

Strategy should never impede design, but rather animate and propel it forward. We needn’t wait for the strategy phase of a project to finish before undertaking some form of design exploration. In fact, the converse is true: getting into early design exploration based on what we provisionally know can inform and enrich strategic exploration. Creating something tangible, even if it means failing early, is a powerful way to gain a fresh vantage point—which can in turn help us crystallize our strategic ideas and outlook.

Stage-planning as an ongoing track in your project plan

By thinking of strategy and planning as a continuous endeavor over the course of a project (instead of a discrete, initial phase) we relieve some of the pressure to get everything right from the start. This frees us to focus on what we’re sure about, identify our assumptions, and acknowledge where critical knowledge gaps exist. Then, as the project evolves, we can refine and revise our plan in light of much more reliable data than we could have projected at the outset.

Strategy Wants to Be Lean

Imagine what it must have once felt like setting out on an ocean voyage to some uncharted place. How would you plan and prepare? Maybe you’d sketch a map or plot a course using various accounts from other travellers. Perhaps you’d study the tides and weather patterns that will impact your outbound route. You would certainly need to build a team and assign roles and responsibilities for each member. These are all great steps to take, but until you actually get in the boat, none of them get you any closer to your destination.

And consider this: the most valuable and reliable tools and methods for finding your way—a compass, celestial navigation etc.—only work once you’re in the boat and on the move!

I want to be clear about one thing: I am not saying there is a one-size-fits-all way to execute strategy for UX design. There are no shortcuts that let us bypass or opt-out of disciplined inquiry. Rigorous investigation and analysis has its place. Ultimately, however, strategy only becomes meaningful when it can be proven out one way or another—just as our sketched map only becomes useful once we’re moving toward our destination.

Effective strategy is bold enough to make claims and stake out territory. Yes, these claims need to be evidence-based, but that doesn’t mean they can never be wrong. Lean strategy for UX encourages us to move forward based on the claims we can make right now; it prompts us to gather our courage and our wits and actually get in the boat. Real discovery can only happen when we embark on the journey.


Compass image courtesy Shutterstock

post authorDavid Gillis

David Gillis, David Gillis is an Interaction Designer at Teehan+Lax, a Toronto-based company that helps clients define and design great user experiences in the digital channel. There, he's done award-winning information architecture and design work for clients like AOL, AIR MILES, John Hancock and Virgin Mobile. David's passion for interaction design has been informed by a wide range of interests and experiences, both academic and professional. In school, he took a multi-disciplinary approach, combining studies in communication, cognitive science and systems design. He holds Bachelor Degrees in Math and English, and a Masters Degree in Information Systems and Knowledge Media Design. Areas of ongoing interest and investigation for David are evidence-based design (how can designers strike a better balance between intuition and formal inquiry), participatory design (how can designers better engage their clients and end-users in collaborative processes), and holistic design (how can we better design experiences that span across multiple modes, touch points and platforms). David is a regular contributor on the Teehan+Lax blog and you can follow him on Twitter @davegillis.


Related Articles

A framework for diagnosing a study with conflicting or misleading results, and what to do about it.

Article by Lawton Pybus
How to Think About UX Research Failures
  • The article examines how UX research studies can fail due to issues in design, analysis, and generalization, using case studies to highlight each category’s importance in maintaining research integrity and relevance.
Share:How to Think About UX Research Failures
6 min read
Article by Alipta Ballav
From Design Thinking to AI Thinking
  • The article outlines a paradigm shift from Design Thinking to AI Thinking, emphasizing the integration of LLMs into various sectors to enhance problem-solving through conversational interfaces.
Share:From Design Thinking to AI Thinking
2 min read

My story of how I dived deep into UX when creating soft toys from scratch without even realising that…

Article by Anastasia Damanchuk
The Parallel Journey of Physical Product Design and UX/UI Design
  • The article highlights the author’s realization of the parallels between physical product design, particularly in the creation of soft toys, and UX/UI design, showcasing how principles like research, prototyping, teamwork, and empathy are fundamental to both domains.
Share:The Parallel Journey of Physical Product Design and UX/UI Design
3 min read

Did you know UX Magazine hosts the most popular podcast about conversational AI?

Listen to Invisible Machines

This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Check our privacy policy and