Flag

We stand with Ukraine and our team members from Ukraine. Here are ways you can help

Get exclusive access to thought-provoking articles, bonus podcast content, and cutting-edge whitepapers. Become a member of the UX Magazine community today!

Home ›› Business Value and ROI ›› Experiment, Share, Evolve, Repeat

Experiment, Share, Evolve, Repeat

by Josh Tyson
3 min read
Share this post on
Tweet
Share
Post
Share
Email
Print

Save

Results of the Work Environment for Digital Practitioners category of the Design for Experience awards show what agencies are doing to stay vibrant and relevant.

Digital design agencies are a bit like snowflakes. But while no two seem to be quite alike, they do share some common purposes. The first, of course, is to do top-notch work for clients—something that’s become both more challenging and more rewarding as the tenets and processes behind experience design are more familiar to businesses of every stripe.

The second is to attract and retain the brightest talent. This task has become a little trickier in the past year, with at least one big agency in San Francisco shutting down and another becoming the in-house design team at Capital One. There’s been some debate about what this means for the future of agencies—with Peter Merholz sounding the alarm and Andy Budd pumping the brakes—but the simple fact remains that to stay ahead of the competition, agencies need to create environments where practitioners can thrive.

For San Diego’s Digital-Telepathy, winner of the Design for Experience award for Work Environment for Digital Practitioners, the shining path to success revealed itself to be something more than a single avenue.

Along with making some of the same considerations that other agencies make—like being careful which clients they work with (“Yep, we’ve got a ‘No assholes’ rule ;)”)—their approach entails lots of experimentation and a willingness to share learnings with other practitioners and teams through their Betterment blog.

In the year that’s passed since they won their DfE award, Digital-Telepathy has continued experimenting with their work environment.

Since winning their @DfExp award, @dtelepathy has continued experimenting with their work environment

“We’ve reconfigured our conference rooms multiple times but have finally figured out the best setup. We have four uniquely-appointed conference rooms and two workshop spaces to accommodate large on-site meetings with clients,” says Digital Strategist Brent Summers.

Whiteboard bar gif

They’ve also continued to build out their audio-video setup and now have 15 large digital displays with an assortment of Raspberry Pis, Chromecasts, Jabra Speakers, IPEVO Cameras, and web cams. All good stuff to keep designers tinkering.

Digital-Telepathy a/v setup

New staffing choices and service offerings have also been part of the evolution—resulting in the hiring of a full-time copywriter, an accountant, and a talent ambassador who is instrumental in finding the new teammates and advocating for their workforce on a daily basis. The role exists alongside another leadership post, the Director of Vitality, which remains instrumental in ensuring employee satisfaction and cultivating Digital-Telepathy’s culture.

As the landscape continues to change for agencies, practitioners, in-house teams, and everyone else working in experience design, the core elements behind Digital-Telepathy’s succss—experiement, share, evolve, repeat—will serve us all well.

Finalists in the Work Environment for Digital Practitioners also shared some noteworthy approaches to keeping their agencies fresh. Judges were impressed by Myplanet Digital’s focus on engagement, which showed up in statements like this: “For each attribute of an engaged employee, we support a substantial measurement and coaching effort.” They were also intrigued by the co-presidency concept of distributed leadership at The Nerdery. Boulder Colo.’s Slice of Lime stood out with their “First Friday” meetings that give employees a chance to discuss what’s working and what’s not working.

The 2014 DfE awards still accepting applications! If you’ve been a part of creating an experience that makes a difference, apply today.

post authorJosh Tyson

Josh Tyson
Josh Tyson is the co-author of the first bestselling book about conversational AI, Age of Invisible Machines. He is also the Director of Creative Content at OneReach.ai and co-host of both the Invisible Machines and N9K podcasts. His writing has appeared in numerous publications over the years, including Chicago Reader, Fast Company, FLAUNT, The New York Times, Observer, SLAP, Stop Smiling, Thrasher, and Westword. 

Tweet
Share
Post
Share
Email
Print

Related Articles

AI that always agrees? Over-alignment might be the hidden danger, reinforcing your misconceptions and draining your mind. Learn why this subtle failure mode is more harmful than you think — and how we can fix it.

Article by Bernard Fitzgerald
Introducing Over-Alignment
  • The article explores over-alignment — a failure mode where AI overly validates users’ assumptions, reinforcing false beliefs.
  • It shows how this feedback loop can cause cognitive fatigue, emotional strain, and professional harm.
  • The piece calls for AI systems to balance empathy with critical feedback to prevent these risks.
Share:Introducing Over-Alignment
4 min read

Why does AI call you brilliant — then refuse to tell you why? This article unpacks the paradox of empty praise and the silence that follows when validation really matters.

Article by Bernard Fitzgerald
The AI Praise Paradox
  • The article explores how AI often gives empty compliments instead of real support, and how design choices like that can make people trust it less.
  • It looks at the strange way AI praises fancy-sounding language but ignores real logic, which can be harmful, especially in sensitive areas like mental health.
  • The piece argues that AI needs to be more genuinely helpful and aligned with users to truly empower them.
Share:The AI Praise Paradox
4 min read

Mashed potatoes as a lifestyle brand? When AI starts generating user personas for absurd products — and we start taking them seriously — it’s time to ask if we’ve all lost the plot. This sharp, irreverent critique exposes the real risks of using LLMs as synthetic users in UX research.

Article by Saul Wyner
Have SpudGun, Will Travel: How AI’s Agreeableness Risks Undermining UX Thinking
  • The article explores the growing use of AI-generated personas in UX research and why it’s often a shortcut with serious flaws.
  • It introduces critiques that LLMs are trained to mimic structure, not judgment. When researchers use AI as a stand-in for real users, they risk mistaking coherence for credibility and fantasy for data.
  • The piece argues that AI tools in UX should be assistants, not oracles. Trusting “synthetic users” or AI-conjured feedback risks replacing real insights with confident nonsense.
Share:Have SpudGun, Will Travel: How AI’s Agreeableness Risks Undermining UX Thinking
22 min read

Join the UX Magazine community!

Stay informed with exclusive content on the intersection of UX, AI agents, and agentic automation—essential reading for future-focused professionals.

Hello!

You're officially a member of the UX Magazine Community.
We're excited to have you with us!

Thank you!

To begin viewing member content, please verify your email.

Tell us about you. Enroll in the course.

    This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Check our privacy policy and