Flag

We stand with Ukraine and our team members from Ukraine. Here are ways you can help

Get exclusive access to thought-provoking articles, bonus podcast content, and cutting-edge whitepapers. Become a member of the UX Magazine community today!

Home ›› Business Value and ROI ›› Experiment, Share, Evolve, Repeat

Experiment, Share, Evolve, Repeat

by Josh Tyson
3 min read
Share this post on
Tweet
Share
Post
Share
Email
Print

Save

Results of the Work Environment for Digital Practitioners category of the Design for Experience awards show what agencies are doing to stay vibrant and relevant.

Digital design agencies are a bit like snowflakes. But while no two seem to be quite alike, they do share some common purposes. The first, of course, is to do top-notch work for clients—something that’s become both more challenging and more rewarding as the tenets and processes behind experience design are more familiar to businesses of every stripe.

The second is to attract and retain the brightest talent. This task has become a little trickier in the past year, with at least one big agency in San Francisco shutting down and another becoming the in-house design team at Capital One. There’s been some debate about what this means for the future of agencies—with Peter Merholz sounding the alarm and Andy Budd pumping the brakes—but the simple fact remains that to stay ahead of the competition, agencies need to create environments where practitioners can thrive.

For San Diego’s Digital-Telepathy, winner of the Design for Experience award for Work Environment for Digital Practitioners, the shining path to success revealed itself to be something more than a single avenue.

Along with making some of the same considerations that other agencies make—like being careful which clients they work with (“Yep, we’ve got a ‘No assholes’ rule ;)”)—their approach entails lots of experimentation and a willingness to share learnings with other practitioners and teams through their Betterment blog.

In the year that’s passed since they won their DfE award, Digital-Telepathy has continued experimenting with their work environment.

Since winning their @DfExp award, @dtelepathy has continued experimenting with their work environment

“We’ve reconfigured our conference rooms multiple times but have finally figured out the best setup. We have four uniquely-appointed conference rooms and two workshop spaces to accommodate large on-site meetings with clients,” says Digital Strategist Brent Summers.

Whiteboard bar gif

They’ve also continued to build out their audio-video setup and now have 15 large digital displays with an assortment of Raspberry Pis, Chromecasts, Jabra Speakers, IPEVO Cameras, and web cams. All good stuff to keep designers tinkering.

Digital-Telepathy a/v setup

New staffing choices and service offerings have also been part of the evolution—resulting in the hiring of a full-time copywriter, an accountant, and a talent ambassador who is instrumental in finding the new teammates and advocating for their workforce on a daily basis. The role exists alongside another leadership post, the Director of Vitality, which remains instrumental in ensuring employee satisfaction and cultivating Digital-Telepathy’s culture.

As the landscape continues to change for agencies, practitioners, in-house teams, and everyone else working in experience design, the core elements behind Digital-Telepathy’s succss—experiement, share, evolve, repeat—will serve us all well.

Finalists in the Work Environment for Digital Practitioners also shared some noteworthy approaches to keeping their agencies fresh. Judges were impressed by Myplanet Digital’s focus on engagement, which showed up in statements like this: “For each attribute of an engaged employee, we support a substantial measurement and coaching effort.” They were also intrigued by the co-presidency concept of distributed leadership at The Nerdery. Boulder Colo.’s Slice of Lime stood out with their “First Friday” meetings that give employees a chance to discuss what’s working and what’s not working.

The 2014 DfE awards still accepting applications! If you’ve been a part of creating an experience that makes a difference, apply today.

post authorJosh Tyson

Josh Tyson
Josh Tyson is the co-author of the first bestselling book about conversational AI, Age of Invisible Machines. He is also the Director of Creative Content at OneReach.ai and co-host of both the Invisible Machines and N9K podcasts. His writing has appeared in numerous publications over the years, including Chicago Reader, Fast Company, FLAUNT, The New York Times, Observer, SLAP, Stop Smiling, Thrasher, and Westword. 

Tweet
Share
Post
Share
Email
Print

Related Articles

Discover how a simple comprehension test reveals if mobile content is too hard to read.

Article by Paivi Salminen
Why Reading on Mobile Is Uniquely Challenging
  • The article explains why mobile reading is harder: small screens and distractions make people miss information even when it’s there.
  • It introduces the cloze test, which removes words to measure real understanding: comprehension drops from 39% on desktop to 19% on mobile.
  • The piece argues that mobile content needs simpler language because the real question is: Does this make sense when life gets in the way?
Share:Why Reading on Mobile Is Uniquely Challenging
4 min read

Learn how to build systems where design explicitly models development, handoff is automatic, and AI can extend your work reliably.

Article by Jim Gulsen
Your Design System Works in Figma. Does It Work in Code?
  • The article explains why many design systems don’t work well: designs made in Figma don’t translate well into code.
  • It introduces five practices: structure frames like code, use fewer components with more variants, organize by how both designers and developers actually work, let AI check your naming, and build documentation into your daily workflow.
  • The piece says that good design systems are the same in design and development, and when they match, everything just works.
Share:Your Design System Works in Figma. Does It Work in Code?
6 min read

Find out why users really abandon your product. It’s not the button color or spacing. It’s something deeper.

Article by Tushar Deshmukh
Friction Science: Why Users Drop Off
  • The article explains that users don’t abandon products because of bad design, but because of psychological friction that makes them uncomfortable.
  • It identifies four types of friction: cognitive, emotional, behavioral, and interaction.
  • The piece emphasizes that designers must focus on cognitive pathways and mental flow, not just visual interfaces, to keep users engaged.
Share:Friction Science: Why Users Drop Off
5 min read

Join the UX Magazine community!

Stay informed with exclusive content on the intersection of UX, AI agents, and agentic automation—essential reading for future-focused professionals.

Hello!

You're officially a member of the UX Magazine Community.
We're excited to have you with us!

Thank you!

To begin viewing member content, please verify your email.

Get Paid to Test AI Products

Earn an average of $100 per test by reviewing AI-first product experiences and sharing your feedback.

    Tell us about you. Enroll in the course.

      This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Check our privacy policy and