Flag

We stand with Ukraine and our team members from Ukraine. Here are ways you can help

Get exclusive access to thought-provoking articles, bonus podcast content, and cutting-edge whitepapers. Become a member of the UX Magazine community today!

Home ›› Agile and Iterative Process ›› Don’t Make it Hard for Users to Provide Feedback #wtfUX

Don’t Make it Hard for Users to Provide Feedback #wtfUX

by Daniel Brown
2 min read
Share this post on
Tweet
Share
Post
Share
Email
Print

Save

User feedback is the lifeblood of experience design. Make it easy and rewarding for your customers to share their feelings and ideas about your product or service.

While most users provide feedback “for the greater good,” it’s still wise to thank them and encourage them to continue doing so. At the very least, avoid doing things that discourage them from submitting feedback.

Bug reports, feature requests, and general feedback help to populate a company’s “to-do list”—a carefully-curated and painstakingly-prioritized roadmap that defines the features of the product. Each of those features has the potential to further empower existing users and attract new ones.

Within the last few months, I’ve provided feedback to a variety of companies, but two experiences stand out.

The first was with Evernote. I had an idea about how to improve Skitch that would save me from having to jump into Photoshop to get the effect I wanted. A day or two later, they sent me the following message:

Evernote feedback

I want to point out a key sentence in that message: “I will be happy to submit this to our developers for you.”

Let’s contrast that with a response from Gliffy. I noted that their zoom function actually requires two clicks just to zoom in and out rather than just one. This was their response:

Gliffy feedback

While Gliffy also thanked me for my feedback and went into inspiring detail about how valuable such feedback is, they rewarded that effort with “Could you now take that feedback, go to a different section of our web site, click on a button, and then re-enter it in a format that is more helpful to us.”

Nnnnnnnope. I already took time out of my day to clearly outline the issue I was having and even proposed a solution for you. My work as a user should be done. Not only did I not re-enter that initial feedback, I’m also not terribly motivated to send them any feedback in the future. What if I don’t remember the method that’s most convenient for them?

The point here is that user feedback can be incredibly valuable; especially when that feedback is coming from paying users who are utilizing your software in a “live” environment. You can get all the feedback in the world from people unable (or unwilling) to pay for your software, but they don’t help you make payroll. When someone takes the time to send you feedback, treat it—and its author—graciously.

 

Keep these coming. Send them to us via Twitter or Facebook using the hastag #wtfUX or email them to: [email protected] with “#wtfUX” in the subject line. Include as much context as you can, so we get a full understanding of what the f%*k went wrong. Image of conversation bubbles courtesy Shutterstock.

post authorDaniel Brown

Daniel Brown
Daniel has spent the past 20 years in software companies both large and small. From web design and development for a “boutique” web design firm to Evangelism for Adobe Systems, to helping budding startup companies get a foothold in the market, he’s worn a variety of “hats". Daniel has spoken at a variety of events worldwide including the Sundance Film Festival, Anderson Ranch Arts Center, Santa Fe Digital Workshops, and the Pacific Imaging Center in Hawaii on the topics of web design, digital imaging, photography, and user experience. Daniel currently serves as the head of the interface and user experience department at a small medical software company in Providence, Rhode Island.

Tweet
Share
Post
Share
Email
Print

Related Articles

The article discusses how we use maturity models in design and argues that “immaturity” frequently reflects smart strategic choices. Instead of trying to reach ideal standards, we should focus on how design aligns with business objectives.

Article by Andy Budd
Just Grow Up: Why Design Maturity Models Might Be Harming Our Industry!
  • The article questions how mature a design is. It states It states that some strategic decisions are called immature.
  • The piece uses budget airlines and luxury carriers as examples. These examples demonstrate that design decisions are based on business strategies, rather than universal standards.
  • The article says we should judge design based on how well it matches business goals, not by strict rules.
Share:Just Grow Up: Why Design Maturity Models Might Be Harming Our Industry!
3 min read

Discover how AI-powered gesture-based navigation is redefining app experiences, making interactions more intuitive and personalized. Explore the opportunities and challenges of this design revolution.

Article by Kevin Gates
Designing Serendipity
  • This article explores the role of AI in enhancing app navigation through gesture-based interactions, emphasizing a shift from traditional menus to intuitive, swipe-driven experiences.
  • It examines the intersection of AI and interaction design, highlighting how machine learning can support user discovery by anticipating needs and surfacing relevant content.
  • The piece critically assesses the potential of gesture-based navigation to improve accessibility, user engagement, and overall app usability, while addressing design challenges and potential pitfalls.
Share:Designing Serendipity
11 min read

Discover how AI is changing UX research. It’s not just making data analysis faster. It’s also encouraging people to think more deeply. Learn how to strike a balance between human insight and AI-driven efficiency to create more thoughtful designs.

Article by Charles Gedeon
How AI and Metacognition Are Shaping UX Research
  • The article talks about how AI can speed up data analysis and encourage people to think more deeply about biases and missed insights, which can improve the quality of user-centered design.
  • It shows that AI-powered UX research tools need to include reflection checkpoints. These checkpoints let researchers critically assess their assumptions and conclusions.
  • The piece highlights the collaboration between AI’s ability to recognize patterns and human judgment to make sure the research outcomes are meaningful and consider the context.
Share:How AI and Metacognition Are Shaping UX Research
4 min read

Join the UX Magazine community!

Stay informed with exclusive content on the intersection of UX, AI agents, and agentic automation—essential reading for future-focused professionals.

Hello!

You're officially a member of the UX Magazine Community.
We're excited to have you with us!

Thank you!

To begin viewing member content, please verify your email.

Tell us about you. Enroll in the course.

    This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Check our privacy policy and