Flag

We stand with Ukraine and our team members from Ukraine. Here are ways you can help

Get exclusive access to thought-provoking articles, bonus podcast content, and cutting-edge whitepapers. Become a member of the UX Magazine community today!

Home ›› Agile and Iterative Process ›› Don’t Make it Hard for Users to Provide Feedback #wtfUX

Don’t Make it Hard for Users to Provide Feedback #wtfUX

by Daniel Brown
2 min read
Share this post on
Tweet
Share
Post
Share
Email
Print

Save

User feedback is the lifeblood of experience design. Make it easy and rewarding for your customers to share their feelings and ideas about your product or service.

While most users provide feedback “for the greater good,” it’s still wise to thank them and encourage them to continue doing so. At the very least, avoid doing things that discourage them from submitting feedback.

Bug reports, feature requests, and general feedback help to populate a company’s “to-do list”—a carefully-curated and painstakingly-prioritized roadmap that defines the features of the product. Each of those features has the potential to further empower existing users and attract new ones.

Within the last few months, I’ve provided feedback to a variety of companies, but two experiences stand out.

The first was with Evernote. I had an idea about how to improve Skitch that would save me from having to jump into Photoshop to get the effect I wanted. A day or two later, they sent me the following message:

Evernote feedback

I want to point out a key sentence in that message: “I will be happy to submit this to our developers for you.”

Let’s contrast that with a response from Gliffy. I noted that their zoom function actually requires two clicks just to zoom in and out rather than just one. This was their response:

Gliffy feedback

While Gliffy also thanked me for my feedback and went into inspiring detail about how valuable such feedback is, they rewarded that effort with “Could you now take that feedback, go to a different section of our web site, click on a button, and then re-enter it in a format that is more helpful to us.”

Nnnnnnnope. I already took time out of my day to clearly outline the issue I was having and even proposed a solution for you. My work as a user should be done. Not only did I not re-enter that initial feedback, I’m also not terribly motivated to send them any feedback in the future. What if I don’t remember the method that’s most convenient for them?

The point here is that user feedback can be incredibly valuable; especially when that feedback is coming from paying users who are utilizing your software in a “live” environment. You can get all the feedback in the world from people unable (or unwilling) to pay for your software, but they don’t help you make payroll. When someone takes the time to send you feedback, treat it—and its author—graciously.

 

Keep these coming. Send them to us via Twitter or Facebook using the hastag #wtfUX or email them to: [email protected] with “#wtfUX” in the subject line. Include as much context as you can, so we get a full understanding of what the f%*k went wrong. Image of conversation bubbles courtesy Shutterstock.

post authorDaniel Brown

Daniel Brown
Daniel has spent the past 20 years in software companies both large and small. From web design and development for a “boutique” web design firm to Evangelism for Adobe Systems, to helping budding startup companies get a foothold in the market, he’s worn a variety of “hats". Daniel has spoken at a variety of events worldwide including the Sundance Film Festival, Anderson Ranch Arts Center, Santa Fe Digital Workshops, and the Pacific Imaging Center in Hawaii on the topics of web design, digital imaging, photography, and user experience. Daniel currently serves as the head of the interface and user experience department at a small medical software company in Providence, Rhode Island.

Tweet
Share
Post
Share
Email
Print

Related Articles

Trusting AI isn’t the goal — relying on it is. This article explores why human trust and AI reliance are worlds apart, and what UX designers should focus on to make AI feel dependable, not human.

Article by Verena Seibert-Giller
The Psychology of Trust in AI: Why “Relying on AI” Matters More than “Trusting It”
  • The article argues that “reliance,” not “trust,” is the right way to think about users’ relationship with AI.
  • It explains that human trust and AI reliance are driven by different psychological mechanisms.
  • The piece highlights that predictability, transparency, and control make users more willing to rely on AI.
  • It concludes that users don’t need to trust AI as a partner — only rely on it as a dependable tool.
Share:The Psychology of Trust in AI: Why “Relying on AI” Matters More than “Trusting It”
4 min read

What if your productivity app could keep you as focused as your favorite game? This article explores how game design psychology can transform everyday tools into experiences that spark flow, focus, and real engagement.

Article by Montgomery Singman
Flow State Design: Applying Game Psychology to Productivity Apps
  • The article shows how principles from game design can help productivity tools create and sustain a flow state.
  • It explains that games succeed by balancing challenge and skill, providing clear goals, and offering immediate feedback — elements most productivity apps lack.
  • The piece argues that applying these psychological insights could make work tools more engaging, adaptive, and motivating.
Share:Flow State Design: Applying Game Psychology to Productivity Apps
12 min read

Learn how understanding user emotions can create intuitive, supportive designs that build trust and loyalty.

Article by Pavel Bukengolts
The Role of Emotion in UX: Embracing Emotionally Intelligent Design
  • The article emphasizes that emotionally intelligent design is key to creating meaningful UX that satisfies users and drives business success.
  • It shows how understanding users’ emotions — through research, empathy mapping, journey mapping, and service blueprinting — can reveal hidden needs and shape more intuitive, reassuring digital experiences.
  • The piece argues that embedding empathy and emotional insights into design strengthens user engagement, loyalty, and overall satisfaction.
Share:The Role of Emotion in UX: Embracing Emotionally Intelligent Design
5 min read

Join the UX Magazine community!

Stay informed with exclusive content on the intersection of UX, AI agents, and agentic automation—essential reading for future-focused professionals.

Hello!

You're officially a member of the UX Magazine Community.
We're excited to have you with us!

Thank you!

To begin viewing member content, please verify your email.

Tell us about you. Enroll in the course.

    This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Check our privacy policy and