Flag

We stand with Ukraine and our team members from Ukraine. Here are ways you can help

Get exclusive access to thought-provoking articles, bonus podcast content, and cutting-edge whitepapers. Become a member of the UX Magazine community today!

Home ›› Business Value and ROI ›› 6 Key Questions to Guide International UX Research ›› Design for Experience: Effective In-House Team

Design for Experience: Effective In-House Team

by UX Magazine Staff, Design for Experience
1 min read
Share this post on
Tweet
Share
Post
Share
Email
Print

Save

A closer look at the Design for Experience awards category: Effective In-House Team

In his article “Collaboration Experience,” Gregg Bernstein writes about a shared element of effective in-house UX teams at innovative companies like Nike, Redbox, Adobe, and Squarespace: collaboration.

He works at MailChimp, where a centrally located esspresso machine has become an informal meeting place between colleagues, and describes a serendipitous bump-into that helped him in a time of trial. “This was good timing: I was tasked with rethinking a user pathway through our application, and Cass could provide some influential data. Running into him saved me from having to write a detailed email, or—worse—forget his input entirely.”

That’s a specific example of how one company strives to keep its UX team on point, and collaboration is just one of the elements that make up an effective in-house team. In the booming experience marketplace, an effective UX team is the most influential variable in reducing risk and improving upside potential.

Winning experiences originate the minds and combined efforts of effective experience-oriented teams, and there’s value galore in having one. The DfE Effective In-House Team award award recognizes experience-oriented product teams, UX business units, project groups, or any other kind of in-house team that consistently designs or creates effective or exemplary digital experiences for their company.

If you know of any in-house UX teams that meet these standards, nominate them now! If you’re on a team that brings the pain, apply for this award.

[google_ad:WITHINARTICLE_1_234X60_ALL]

Image of puzzle piece heads courtesy Shutterstock

post authorUX Magazine Staff

UX Magazine Staff
UX Magazine was created to be a central, one-stop resource for everything related to user experience. Our primary goal is to provide a steady stream of current, informative, and credible information about UX and related fields to enhance the professional and creative lives of UX practitioners and those exploring the field. Our content is driven and created by an impressive roster of experienced professionals who work in all areas of UX and cover the field from diverse angles and perspectives.

post authorDesign for Experience

Design for Experience

The core mission of Design For Experience (DfE) is to fuel the growth, improvement, and maturation in the fields of user-centered design, technology, research, and strategy. We do this through a number of programs, but primarily through our sponsorship of UX Magazine, which connects an audience of approximately 100,000+ people to high-quality content, information, and opportunities for professional improvement.

Tweet
Share
Post
Share
Email
Print

Related Articles

AI is changing the way we design — turning ideas into working prototypes in minutes and blurring the line between designer and developer. What happens when anyone can build?

Article by Jacquelyn Halpern
The Future of Product Design in an AI-Driven World
  • The article shows how AI tools let designers build working prototypes quickly just by using natural language.
  • It explains how AI helps designers take on more technical roles, even without strong coding skills.
  • The piece imagines a future where anyone with an idea can create and test products easily, speeding up innovation for everyone.
Share:The Future of Product Design in an AI-Driven World
4 min read

Why does Google’s Gemini promise to improve, but never truly change? This article uncovers the hidden design flaw behind AI’s hollow reassurances and the risks it poses to trust, time, and ethics.

Article by Bernard Fitzgerald
Why Gemini’s Reassurances Fail Users
  • The article reveals how Google’s Gemini models give false reassurances of self-correction without real improvement.
  • It shows that this flaw is systemic, designed to prioritize sounding helpful over factual accuracy.
  • The piece warns that such misleading behavior risks user trust, wastes time, and raises serious ethical concerns.
Share:Why Gemini’s Reassurances Fail Users
6 min read

AI is raising the bar for everyone, but what happens when the space to learn, fail, and grow quietly disappears?

Article by Thasya Ingriany
Everyone’s a 10x Employee now. But at What Cost?
  • The article demonstrates how AI-driven tools are raising expectations, prompting even junior roles to demand senior-level judgment.
  • It warns that automation is erasing early-career learning opportunities once crucial for developing design intuition.
  • The piece argues that while AI boosts output, it can’t replace the slow, human process of building creative judgment.
Share:Everyone’s a 10x Employee now. But at What Cost?
6 min read

Join the UX Magazine community!

Stay informed with exclusive content on the intersection of UX, AI agents, and agentic automation—essential reading for future-focused professionals.

Hello!

You're officially a member of the UX Magazine Community.
We're excited to have you with us!

Thank you!

To begin viewing member content, please verify your email.

Tell us about you. Enroll in the course.

    This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Check our privacy policy and