Flag

We stand with Ukraine and our team members from Ukraine. Here are ways you can help

Get exclusive access to thought-provoking articles, bonus podcast content, and cutting-edge whitepapers. Become a member of the UX Magazine community today!

Home ›› Design Theory ›› Mentorship Match — How a simple LinkedIn feature can boost diversity

Mentorship Match — How a simple LinkedIn feature can boost diversity

by Julia Kornmann
5 min read
Share this post on
Tweet
Share
Post
Share
Email
Print

Save

LeadBannerLinkedIn

Diversity is tied to culture and financial performance

In Germany, men still make up more than 90% of executive board members and only 9,3% are women. — AllBright 2019

LinkedIn offers immense potential for diversity

LinkedIn

Source: LinkedIn

Personally, I am an advocate for meaningful user engagement but if we only engage with our own bubble, aren’t we disregarding the great potential for diverse interactions LinkedIn offers us?

How to tap into LinkedIn’s diverse user base: a feature design challenge

Junior Professionals
Senior Professionals

There is a problem that no competitor solves

We have observed that LinkedIn is not granting accessibility and the curated matching of junior and senior professionals which is causing a lack of meaningful networking and professional success.

Comparison Chart

Market Positioning Mape of the LinkedIn mentorship feature

Rolling up the sleeves, designing the solution

Happy path

Happy path of senior professionals

Wireframes

Mid-fidelity wireframes

Feature

Style tile LinkedIn mentorship feature

App
Example screen

Prototype LinkedIn Mentorship Feature

What comes next

Final thoughts

post authorJulia Kornmann

Julia Kornmann

I’m Julia, a curious human being currently making trouble as a UX designer. Drawing from years of business and entrepreneurship experience, I came to understand that only empathetic and user-focused decisions lead to sustainable success. Thus, I am driving user-centered design aligned with business needs. 

Tweet
Share
Post
Share
Email
Print

Related Articles

Learn why healthcare blames human error instead of fixing broken design, and what needs to change.

Article by Paivi Salminen
Designing for Oops
  • The article explains why mistakes happen, not because we’re careless, but because most systems are built as if humans never mess up.
  • It demonstrates how slips (doing the wrong thing) and mistakes (thinking the wrong thing) require different solutions, including better design for slips and a deeper understanding of mistakes.
  • The piece outlines how aviation and factories prevent errors by removing blame, allowing workers to stop production when something’s off, and designing systems that make it difficult to do the wrong thing, and asks why healthcare hasn’t done the same.
Share:Designing for Oops
4 min read

Join the UX Magazine community!

Stay informed with exclusive content on the intersection of UX, AI agents, and agentic automation—essential reading for future-focused professionals.

Hello!

You're officially a member of the UX Magazine Community.
We're excited to have you with us!

Thank you!

To begin viewing member content, please verify your email.

Get Paid to Test AI Products

Earn an average of $100 per test by reviewing AI-first product experiences and sharing your feedback.

    Tell us about you. Enroll in the course.

      This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Check our privacy policy and