Flag

We stand with Ukraine and our team members from Ukraine. Here are ways you can help

Get exclusive access to thought-provoking articles, bonus podcast content, and cutting-edge whitepapers. Become a member of the UX Magazine community today!

Home ›› Business Value and ROI ›› 6 Key Questions to Guide International UX Research ›› Design for Experience: Academic Program

Design for Experience: Academic Program

by UX Magazine Staff, Design for Experience
2 min read
Share this post on
Tweet
Share
Post
Share
Email
Print

Save

A closer look at the Design for Experience awards category: Academic Program

In an article published back in June titled “Tectonics of UX,” Design for Experience award judge Mark Baskinger put forth an intersting question: “Quite often, design is thought of as a problem-solving exercise. But is it really about problems? Or is design about potential?”

“Applicants to design school often write that they are attracted to the ‘problem-solving’ nature of design,” the article continues. “Perhaps the point of the first few weeks of school should be to change their understanding of what design is believed to be and what it is … Students have the remainder of their educational experience and their whole careers to explore what design could be.”

Baskinger is an associate professor in the School of Design at Carnegie Mellon University, so the question of how to most effectively prepare students for experience-oriented professions is in familiar territory. The DfE Academic Program award looks at both traditional and non-traditional settings that do the best job of preparing students with the right information, skills, soft skills, and experience to contribute valuably to experience-driven projects. This acedemic excellence can be represented by approaching students with philisophical shifts in thinking like those Baskinger describes or programs like those at the Illinois Institute of Design that ephasize a foundation of business strategy.

If design is about potential, then students represent a wellspring of it. The DfE awards are interested in nominations for this category that take any number of appraoches to preparing students and helping them make the most of their own potential.

If you know of academic programs that prepare students in an effective way that we can all learn from, nominate them. If you think that your academic program deserves DfE recognition, apply for this award right now!

Image of magical books courtesy Shutterstock

post authorUX Magazine Staff

UX Magazine Staff
UX Magazine was created to be a central, one-stop resource for everything related to user experience. Our primary goal is to provide a steady stream of current, informative, and credible information about UX and related fields to enhance the professional and creative lives of UX practitioners and those exploring the field. Our content is driven and created by an impressive roster of experienced professionals who work in all areas of UX and cover the field from diverse angles and perspectives.

post authorDesign for Experience

Design for Experience

The core mission of Design For Experience (DfE) is to fuel the growth, improvement, and maturation in the fields of user-centered design, technology, research, and strategy. We do this through a number of programs, but primarily through our sponsorship of UX Magazine, which connects an audience of approximately 100,000+ people to high-quality content, information, and opportunities for professional improvement.

Tweet
Share
Post
Share
Email
Print

Related Articles

Find out how clicking “Accept All” is not really consent and how ethical UX design can return user choice to users.

Article by Tushar Deshmukh
Consent Fatigue: Are We Designing People into Compliance?
  • The article shows that consent fatigue is not a user problem but a design problem in which endless permission popups, visual manipulation, and legal-shield thinking have quietly replaced real user autonomy with engineered compliance.
Share:Consent Fatigue: Are We Designing People into Compliance?
10 min read

Learn how the smallest design decisions, a default checkbox, a colored button, and a progress bar, have the biggest ethical weight.

Article by Tushar Deshmukh
The Psychology of Nudges: Why the Smallest Design Element Can Shift the Biggest Outcomes
  • The piece draws a sharp line between nudges and dark patterns by asking one question: who benefits, the user or the platform? Same tools, opposite ethics.
Share:The Psychology of Nudges: Why the Smallest Design Element Can Shift the Biggest Outcomes
6 min read

Find out why your most important design elements keep getting ignored and what you can do about it.

Article by Tushar Deshmukh
Attention Engineering: Why Users Ignore Even the Most Important Elements
  • The piece explains why users keep missing important buttons and instructions, not because they’re careless, but because the brain automatically blocks out most of what it sees and shows designers how to work with this instead of fighting it.
Share:Attention Engineering: Why Users Ignore Even the Most Important Elements
6 min read

Join the UX Magazine community!

Stay informed with exclusive content on the intersection of UX, AI agents, and agentic automation—essential reading for future-focused professionals.

Hello!

You're officially a member of the UX Magazine Community.
We're excited to have you with us!

Thank you!

To begin viewing member content, please verify your email.

Get Paid to Test AI Products

Earn an average of $100 per test by reviewing AI-first product experiences and sharing your feedback.

    Tell us about you. Enroll in the course.

      This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Check our privacy policy and