Flag

We stand with Ukraine and our team members from Ukraine. Here are ways you can help

Get exclusive access to thought-provoking articles, bonus podcast content, and cutting-edge whitepapers. Become a member of the UX Magazine community today!

Home ›› Content and Copy ›› Sweat the Small Stuff

Sweat the Small Stuff

by Time Barrow
7 min read
Share this post on
Tweet
Share
Post
Share
Email
Print

Save

Thinking about essential issues in content design and adhering to a style guide helps ensure your content is both correct and consistent.

As senior UX writer for a leading Internet juggernaut, I largely produce in-application copy. Among various types of writing and deliverables, I create very short text items, such as field labels, section titles, and button names. While these items may not be lengthy, they’re extremely important and should not be created hastily. By incorporating these smaller items into your company style guide, you’ll promote consistency for readers and speed the creation process.

It’s not that simple

It’s common for some developers, designers, UI architects, and management to not quite understand what goes into the creation of Web content. (That’s fine—we writers don’t fully get their roles, either.) These folks are often under the impression that it takes mere moments to come up with a few logical words to label these text elements.

If your department or company does not have a style guide, make one

For example, I’m frequently contacted to label some new button or other element on the spot. But rarely can I immediately rattle off what they need. This is neither a lack of willingness to assist nor a shortcoming in my abilities—rather, the reality is that most seemingly simple labeling requires more information, explanation, and research than it might appear.

Granted, it’s understandable why one might assume that any decent UX writer could merely look at an element and just know what its label should be. After all, the visual element (button, field label, header, etc.) has a name that we’re calling it, and it serves a specific function. Why don’t we simply just use that?

The reason is that what may seem logical may not be correct and consistent with how we label similar elements. For example, while it seems fitting to label that menu item that users click to update personal information like their email and password as Account, your standards and similar uses might reveal it’s referred to by another name, such as My Account, Your Account, Personal Info, or even just Settings. So, it’s not always obvious, intuitive, or easy to determine what that text should be; it almost always takes some level of research. To create just the right copy requires an understanding of the:

  • user interface
  • element’s purpose
  • company/departmental standards
  • application standards
  • industry standards
  • audience
  • management, marketing folks, product owners, etc. (who may need to weigh in on such seemingly miniscule text)

A lapse in this understanding, or the effective application of it, can make the interaction or interface confusing, inconsistent, or inaccurate, any of which can repel a user. So, it’s important to go through the steps necessary to present just the right label.

Begin with a little research

There’s a process to creating that just right label for a given purpose and instance. However, before you embark on that process, you should first determine if there’s already a precedent for the element in question. That is, there might be standards in place that determine how such an item should be labeled.

Therefore, first consult your departmental and company style guide, since you should use any established standards. If no such standard exists, look through other pages within the application or website to see how the same or similar elements are labeled. If your organization has other applications or websites, consult those sources as well.

Creation considerations

Let’s say you’ve found nothing established and you’re creating this element anew. Nailing that spot-on text is not all that difficult, but it takes serious consideration of a few factors to not let the wrong message slip through.

For example, think about the process of creating a new account for an online application or site. Generally, users must complete a standard form requiring input of name, address, email address, username, password, etc.  While it may seem that most of the labels that mark these fields are pretty standard, there can be variations and decisions to be made. Even the basic “name” entry may be one, two, three, or even more (if there is a prefix/suffix option) fields.

  • If the name prompt is for a single field, the label could be any one of:
    • Name:
    • First/Last Name:
    • First and Last Name:
  • If there are two separate fields for the name you might simply label the two:
    • First Name:
    • Last Name:

While there are some options for the single field example, the two-field example seems pretty obvious. But hang on, is the capitalization correct? Your department’s style guide may require them to be First name: and Last name:. Additionally, the colon that I have included in these examples may not be part of your style guide. Toss in the fact that some labels, like Username, can be written as either one or two words, and you can see that some of the most basic tiny elements require much consideration for consistency. Taking the time to ensure your labeling is correct and consistent helps avoid potential customer confusion and maintain your company’s credibility.

To continue with the account creation example, after entering the required information, the user clicks a button to submit the form and get access to the account. But what should that button be named? Some likely possibilities include: Get Started, Finished, Submit, OK, Next, or Continue. At the surface, any of those labels seem acceptable for this interaction. But situations can vary, so let’s whittle some of those down:

  • The user has already begun the process of setting up the account by entering the information into the form, so Get Started may not be the most fitting.
  • In most situations of such an initial account setup form being presented, there are additional steps to perform, such as setting up a product, building a website, or whatever the application does. Therefore, Finished is not accurate.
  • This is a form that the user has completed, so Submit, which is a largely accepted standard as the completion button on a form, is a good possibility. However, as a user, Submit feels a bit terminal to me. That is, it’s for the sort of form that I complete and am done. In most cases, the form establishes the base information for the account, but there’s more one can do.
  • Completing this form is a first step in achieving whatever the larger goal of getting the application going is. Therefore, something like Next or Continue is logical. However, if the entire procedure is not presented as a series of steps, Next is not correct. Continue is a better option.
  • It’s pretty ambiguous to use just OK, but that non-specific nature of it could be good, since it doesn’t suffer from the issues raised on the previous possibilities.

So, we’re down to Continue and OK as logical possibilities. Before making a final decision, you also want to consider tone and audience. Something like OK is probably fine for the average application, such as a game, website designer, or text editor. However, as you get into more security/protection and financial-based applications, the audience is taking this experience a bit more seriously and OK may come across as too informal.

Back to the guides and considerations

For the sake of our example, you found no standard in place for how the button in this situation should be labeled, and you choose to go with OK. However, now you’re faced with how to display that message on the button. Is it OK, OKAY, or Ok? To answer this question, you can again look to the style guides that are in place. While there may not be a standard for this particular button label, there may be a precedent set for how this particular term is written when used for other elements, or there may be specific abbreviation and capitalization standards.

You also want to think about the length of the label you’ve created. Clearly, OK is sure to fit on any button; even the longer form OKAY is not likely to give you any trouble. However, you may have spatial constraints you need to consider if you’re dealing with longer text. For example, something like Welcome to WordPress may be the ideal text for a label in style and purpose, but it might not fit on a button that offers limited space. Therefore, to shorten the button text, you might be able to get away with Welcome if, in the context of the area in which the button is displayed, it is obvious that the text is referring to WordPress.

Finally, if this text will be translated for international delivery, you’ve also got both technical and cultural considerations. Is Welcome going to fit on that button once it is translated into a language that spells the word with twice as many characters? Is OK going to be understood by the international markets for whom you’re translating? If not, you might need an alternate term at the ready. Either way, it’s a good idea to consult with your translation and international teams to see what’s needed.

Put it all into action

As you can see, even the simplest content elements for very basic interactions can require extensive research and thought to determine the logical, accurate, and compliant labels. This, of course, also extends to other elements, such as error messages, pop-up messages, modals, and page-level help.

If your department or company does not have a style guide, make one. If you create a new element that is likely to be reused directly or can serve as an example for future use, add it to the guide. Thinking about these essential issues in content design and adhering to a style guide helps ensure your content is both correct and consistent. This keeps your customers clear on what to expect, what to do, and where to find what they need.

post authorTime Barrow

Time Barrow

Time lives in Bellevue, WA with his wife, daughter, and 2 pups. In addition to his day gig as a UX writer, he teaches courses at ASU on Web Authoring and Writing for Digital Media.
Time has a forthcoming book (co-authored with Brian Dunn), Make Art Happen: How to Create In Spite of Life’s Chaos. It is the first in a (currently) 3-book series. He has published short stories and poetry in The Piker PressThee Neverending Page and Thought Crime Magazine (where he served as co-editor). You can follow his publication progress and prowess at https://.timewrites.com.
Time earned his doctorate in Technical Communication and Rhetoric from Texas Tech University. He’s published a number of academic articles, including on using new media in the online classroom for the Rocky Mountain Communication Review, covering the 2005 Intel ISEF Technical Competition in Intercom Magazine, and a co-authored article on expanding composition audiences with podcasting for Computers & Composition Online. His work can also be found on Academia.edu.

Tweet
Share
Post
Share
Email
Print

Related Articles

Discover how digital twins are transforming industries by enabling innovation and reducing waste. This article delves into the power of digital twins to create virtual replicas, allowing companies to improve products, processes, and sustainability efforts before physical resources are used. Read on to see how this cutting-edge technology helps streamline operations and drive smarter, eco-friendly decisions

Article by Alla Slesarenko
How Digital Twins Drive Innovation and Minimize Waste
  • The article explores how digital twins—virtual models of physical objects—enable organizations to drive innovation by allowing testing and improvements before physical implementation.
  • It discusses how digital twins can minimize waste and increase efficiency by identifying potential issues early, ultimately optimizing resource use.
  • The piece emphasizes the role of digital twins in various sectors, showcasing their capacity to improve processes, product development, and sustainability initiatives.
Share:How Digital Twins Drive Innovation and Minimize Waste
5 min read

Discover how venture capital firms are shaping the future of product design — and why experienced design leaders need to be consulted to ensure creativity and strategy aren’t left behind. This article delves into the power VCs hold in talent acquisition and team dynamics, highlighting the need for a collaborative approach to foster true innovation.

Article by Darren Smith
How Venture Capital Firms Are Shaping the Future of Product Design, & Why Design Leaders Need to Be Part of the Solution
  • The article explores how venture capital (VC) firms shape product design by providing startups with critical resources like funding, strategic advice, and network access, but often lack an understanding of design’s strategic value.
  • It discusses the impact of VC-led hiring practices in design, which can lead to misaligned job roles, undervalued design leadership, and teams focused more on output than innovation.
  • The piece calls for a collaborative approach where design leaders work alongside VCs in talent acquisition and strategic planning, establishing design as a key partner to drive product innovation and long-term brand success.
Share:How Venture Capital Firms Are Shaping the Future of Product Design, & Why Design Leaders Need to Be Part of the Solution
8 min read

Discover the journey of design systems — from the modularity of early industrial and printing innovations to today’s digital frameworks that shape user experiences. This article reveals how design systems evolved into powerful tools for cohesive branding, efficient scaling, and unified collaboration across design and development teams. Dive into the history and future of design systems!

Article by Jim Gulsen
A Brief History of Design Systems. Part 1
  • The article offers a historical perspective on design systems, tracing their origins from early modularity concepts in industrial design to the digital era, where they have become essential for consistent user experiences.
  • It highlights the evolution of design systems as organizations sought ways to streamline UI and UX elements, allowing teams to maintain cohesive branding while speeding up development.
  • The piece draws parallels between the development of design systems and pivotal moments in history, especially in print technology, where breakthroughs transformed access and consistency. These precedents show how modern design systems evolved into essential tools for business value.
  • It emphasizes how modern design systems empower teams to scale efficiently, fostering a shared language among designers and developers, and promoting a user-centered approach that benefits both businesses and end-users.
Share:A Brief History of Design Systems. Part 1
16 min read

Join the UX Magazine community!

Stay informed with exclusive content on the intersection of UX, AI agents, and agentic automation—essential reading for future-focused professionals.

Hello!

You're officially a member of the UX Magazine Community.
We're excited to have you with us!

Thank you!

To begin viewing member content, please verify your email.

Tell us about you. Enroll in the course.

    This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Check our privacy policy and