Flag

We stand with Ukraine and our team members from Ukraine. Here are ways you can help

Get exclusive access to thought-provoking articles, bonus podcast content, and cutting-edge whitepapers. Become a member of the UX Magazine community today!

Home ›› Business Value and ROI ›› 6 Key Questions to Guide International UX Research ›› Design for Experience: Work Environment for Digital Practitioners

Design for Experience: Work Environment for Digital Practitioners

by UX Magazine Staff, Design for Experience
3 min read
Share this post on
Tweet
Share
Post
Share
Email
Print

Save

A closer look at the Design for Experience awards category: Work Environment for Digital Practitioners

The employment marketplace for experience-oriented pracitioners is fiercely competitive. Researchers, designers, and developers are in high demand, and agencies and companies have to go above and beyond to attract, retain, and motivate the talent necessary for building exceptional digital experiences.

Different companies go about this in different ways. Citrix, a multinational cloud company that enables mobile workstyles, uses spacial design to engender collaboration. Their flagship, 2,500-square-foot studio has glass walls for maximum transparency, positioned next to the executive boardroom. Here, you’ll find fewer tall dark gray cubicles and offices, and more wide open seating where communal spaces afford spontaneous and random interactions between employees in different departments.

“I’ve led the creation and propagation of a philosophy we call Three in a Box,” says Uday Gajendar, Principal Product Designer, Customer Experience. “[For this] we require Design, Engineering, and Business to all be together when defining and executing a project from initial concept to final customer delivery and follow-through.

Citrix also hosts book clubs, design salons, and “Wine & Design” evening events with guest speakers sharing ideas on teamwork and UX. Befitting of a company renowned for mobile solutions, they aslo encourage remote teams to turn on webcams when doing GoTOMeeting calls. “This gets people seeing each other,” Gajendar notes, “nothing like facial expressions to convey commitment.”

In their popular article from earlier this year, Hiring the Right Designer,” Alexa Curtis and John Payne of the New York firm Moment describe the environment they’ve created and how they ensure that the right designers are in place.

“We actively seek designers from varied backgrounds to enrich our way of thinking about the work we do,” they explain. “Our 40-person group includes people from all over the country and the world, representing myriad academic areas, from international relations to psychology to studio art to the more obvious industrial and graphic design. The best work happens when you bring all these bright and opinionated people together to work on solving client problems.”

[google_ad:WITHINARTICLE_1_234X60_ALL]

Curtis and Payne have worked to cultivate a collaborative atosphere where designers critique and evaluate openly, putting an emphasis on storytelling. “We hire to add the right people to the firm,” they conclude. “After ten years, every new addition to the firm brings something surprising, something special, and something that makes Moment better than we were before.”

At the headquarters for global retailer Nordstrom, the UX team has a home base in a centralized, open space with low walls and lots of whiteboards for spontaneous collaboration. “This set up allows the designers to partner up and discuss their designs with their peers and leaders to obtain feedback,” Lara Modisette, a corporate recruiter for the company says.

“When not at their UX home, the designers are ‘hoteling’ or embedding with the development groups they support. This allows our UX designers to collaborate closely with the technical teams earlier in the design process and throughout the development processes. Currently, the embedded designers spend about 60-70% of their time with their squads and the rest of their time back at home base.”

Measures are also taken to ensure that designers feel supported by their leadership and team, with managers conducting weekly one-on-ones with each designer talking about any blocking issues and learning opportunities. “We also encourage participation in activities like daily team stand up, war room, cross-team design activities, and all-team meetings,” Modisette says. “These activities are social by default and they enable collaboration and camaraderie among team members. It also gets designers in the habit of sharing information, which builds trust and open communication among the team.”

There is no best way for keeping experience design practitioners invigorated and satisfied, and the DfE Work Environment for Digital Practitioners award recognizes agencies and companies that have created unique and outstanding work environments that foster productivity while keeping turnover low and retention strong.

If you can think of an agency or company that provides a great place for experience designers to thrive, nominate them now! If you work in an environment that brings out your professional best, apply for this award.

Image of creative workspace courtesy Shutterstock

post authorUX Magazine Staff

UX Magazine Staff
UX Magazine was created to be a central, one-stop resource for everything related to user experience. Our primary goal is to provide a steady stream of current, informative, and credible information about UX and related fields to enhance the professional and creative lives of UX practitioners and those exploring the field. Our content is driven and created by an impressive roster of experienced professionals who work in all areas of UX and cover the field from diverse angles and perspectives.

post authorDesign for Experience

Design for Experience

The core mission of Design For Experience (DfE) is to fuel the growth, improvement, and maturation in the fields of user-centered design, technology, research, and strategy. We do this through a number of programs, but primarily through our sponsorship of UX Magazine, which connects an audience of approximately 100,000+ people to high-quality content, information, and opportunities for professional improvement.

Tweet
Share
Post
Share
Email
Print

Related Articles

AI that always agrees? Over-alignment might be the hidden danger, reinforcing your misconceptions and draining your mind. Learn why this subtle failure mode is more harmful than you think — and how we can fix it.

Article by Bernard Fitzgerald
Introducing Over-Alignment
  • The article explores over-alignment — a failure mode where AI overly validates users’ assumptions, reinforcing false beliefs.
  • It shows how this feedback loop can cause cognitive fatigue, emotional strain, and professional harm.
  • The piece calls for AI systems to balance empathy with critical feedback to prevent these risks.
Share:Introducing Over-Alignment
4 min read

Why does AI call you brilliant — then refuse to tell you why? This article unpacks the paradox of empty praise and the silence that follows when validation really matters.

Article by Bernard Fitzgerald
The AI Praise Paradox
  • The article explores how AI often gives empty compliments instead of real support, and how design choices like that can make people trust it less.
  • It looks at the strange way AI praises fancy-sounding language but ignores real logic, which can be harmful, especially in sensitive areas like mental health.
  • The piece argues that AI needs to be more genuinely helpful and aligned with users to truly empower them.
Share:The AI Praise Paradox
4 min read

Mashed potatoes as a lifestyle brand? When AI starts generating user personas for absurd products — and we start taking them seriously — it’s time to ask if we’ve all lost the plot. This sharp, irreverent critique exposes the real risks of using LLMs as synthetic users in UX research.

Article by Saul Wyner
Have SpudGun, Will Travel: How AI’s Agreeableness Risks Undermining UX Thinking
  • The article explores the growing use of AI-generated personas in UX research and why it’s often a shortcut with serious flaws.
  • It introduces critiques that LLMs are trained to mimic structure, not judgment. When researchers use AI as a stand-in for real users, they risk mistaking coherence for credibility and fantasy for data.
  • The piece argues that AI tools in UX should be assistants, not oracles. Trusting “synthetic users” or AI-conjured feedback risks replacing real insights with confident nonsense.
Share:Have SpudGun, Will Travel: How AI’s Agreeableness Risks Undermining UX Thinking
22 min read

Join the UX Magazine community!

Stay informed with exclusive content on the intersection of UX, AI agents, and agentic automation—essential reading for future-focused professionals.

Hello!

You're officially a member of the UX Magazine Community.
We're excited to have you with us!

Thank you!

To begin viewing member content, please verify your email.

Tell us about you. Enroll in the course.

    This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Check our privacy policy and