Flag

We stand with Ukraine and our team members from Ukraine. Here are ways you can help

Get exclusive access to thought-provoking articles, bonus podcast content, and cutting-edge whitepapers. Become a member of the UX Magazine community today!

Home ›› Design Theory ›› The Rise of Relational Design

The Rise of Relational Design

by Fabian Pfortmuller
3 min read
Share this post on
Tweet
Share
Post
Share
Email
Print

Save

What if we designed anything with relationships in mind?

Strong relationships are not a frilly accessory in a happy neighborhood, a thriving school, an effective health service, a flourishing business, or a successful and cohesive society. They are the making of it all. Working towards a world of good relationships, wherever we are and whatever we do, is simply common sense. We want to make it common practice.“ David Robinson, Relationships Project

I see a new field emerging that we might call Relational Design. It is natural to have a relational lens when working with communities, groups, and networks. That’s the obvious use case. But now a new field is emerging that applies the same principle to, well, anything. What if you used a relational approach to how you design cities, how you create housing projects, how you run a non-profit, how you strengthen a neighborhood, or how you design healthcare in a more holistic way?

This nascent design approach shares a few assumptions

  • Relationships are not just a means to an end, but valuable in itself (said most beautifully by David Robinson’s quote above).
  • Relationships are a tremendous and highly under-leveraged source of transformation and well-being. Things, services, offerings, and systems simply become better when we design them in a relational way.

Here are some examples of Relational Design

Intro video from Participatory City (London)

A very new or a very old field?

When you look at the actual practices, none of them are rocket science, and none of them are actually new. But maybe that’s exactly the point. The Einhorn primer puts it beautifully: “Most likely, none of these practices will be radically new to you. But it is precisely the fact that they are radically old that makes them powerful and accessible to all of us”. It seems as this field matures, our job is not to invent, but rather to rediscover old practices and apply them to today’s contexts.

Is this how we’ll change culture?

I work in service of a future where our culture values relationships. Many of us sense how capitalism has stripped most relational elements out of our lives and many of us crave a sense of true belonging and connectedness. Yet how do we get there? I sense that by designing anything with a relational lens we start to change offerings, institutions, systems, and eventually culture.

What do you think?

How does this resonate? Where are you seeing Relational Design emerging outside of the traditional community space? I’d be so grateful to hear your thoughts and reflections in the comments.

post authorFabian Pfortmuller

Fabian Pfortmuller

Fabian Pfortmüller is a Swiss community builder in Amsterdam. Fabian is also co-author of the Community Canvas, an open-source framework for community builders and Innovator in Residence for the Kauffman Foundation.

Tweet
Share
Post
Share
Email
Print
Ideas In Brief
  • The author believes that putting relationships first should be a common practice in every part of human activity.
  • The author sees a relational design as something we can anticipate in the nearest future. It can be applied in many cases – from designing cities to building any type of organization or system.
  • Relational design isn’t new in any way – the fact they are old makes them this powerful. With relationships in mind, we can start designing a new future.

Related Articles

Learn how one product designer built a faster, sharper workflow where AI does the scaffolding, judgment owns the outcome, and nothing ships without a traceable why.

Article by Pavel Bukengolts
The Spiral Climbs: Ideas Are Expensive, Systems Are Cheap
  • The piece explores that design is no longer about designing screens but owning systems, bets, and outcomes. But the core judgment, empathy, and research are irreplaceable. I chain Miro, Figma, VS Code, GitHub, and Jira into one traceable loop from idea to learning. AI takes on the exploration and scaffolding. People own architecture, security, and accountability. A 48-hour operating cadence of small, measurable bets, linked artifacts, and documented decisions keeps speed honest.
Share:The Spiral Climbs: Ideas Are Expensive, Systems Are Cheap
6 min read

Discover why the points, badges, and streaks in your favorite apps aren’t really gamification.

Article by Montgomery Singman
Gamification 2.0. Beyond Points and Badges: Designing for Players, Not Metrics. Chapter 1: The Problem
  • The piece claims that most apps misuse gamification, copying superficial mechanics like points and badges that trick rather than motivate people, and that the experience itself is what truly drives engagement, just like good games do.
Share:Gamification 2.0. Beyond Points and Badges: Designing for Players, Not Metrics. Chapter 1: The Problem
4 min read

Learn why the real design challenge of agile is not speed but learning to design smaller, one valuable slice at a time.

Article by Paivi Salminen
Designing Small Is Harder than Designing Big
  • The article suggests that agile design is not about quick development but rather the more difficult discipline of designing smaller, resisting the temptation to map out complete systems, avoiding the snare of horizontal slicing, and inquiring into what the smallest iteration of an idea is that still provides real value to users.
Share:Designing Small Is Harder than Designing Big
5 min read

Join the UX Magazine community!

Stay informed with exclusive content on the intersection of UX, AI agents, and agentic automation—essential reading for future-focused professionals.

Hello!

You're officially a member of the UX Magazine Community.
We're excited to have you with us!

Thank you!

To begin viewing member content, please verify your email.

Get Paid to Test AI Products

Earn an average of $100 per test by reviewing AI-first product experiences and sharing your feedback.

    Tell us about you. Enroll in the course.

      This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Check our privacy policy and