Flag

We stand with Ukraine and our team members from Ukraine. Here are ways you can help

Get exclusive access to thought-provoking articles, bonus podcast content, and cutting-edge whitepapers. Become a member of the UX Magazine community today!

Home ›› UX Design ›› The Three Lenses of UX: Because Not All UX Is the Same

The Three Lenses of UX: Because Not All UX Is the Same

by Oliver West
4 min read
Share this post on
Tweet
Share
Post
Share
Email
Print

Save

Great designers don’t do everything; they see the world through different lenses: creative, scientific, and strategic. This article explains why those differences aren’t flaws, but rather the core reason UX works, and how identifying your own lens can transform careers, hiring, and collaboration. If you’ve ever wondered why “unicorn” designers don’t exist, this perspective explains why.

UX is often described as a mix of art and science, but that definition is too simple. The truth is, UX is a spectrum made up of three distinct but interlinked lenses:

  • Creativity: Bringing clarity, emotion, and imagination to how we solve problems.
  • Science: Applying evidence, psychology, and rigor to understand behavior.
  • Business: Focusing on relevance, outcomes, and measurable value.

Every UX professional looks through these lenses differently. And that’s exactly how it should be.

Why the three lenses matter

UX isn’t one thing. It’s a discipline of perspectives, a blend of skills that shift depending on your role, your background, and the kind of problems you’re solving.

However, the industry often blurs those distinctions. Job titles like “UX/UI Designer” suggest a single, catch-all capability when, in reality, each role operates through a different balance of the three lenses.

This misunderstanding leads to frustration on both sides:

  • Designers feel they’re being asked to do everything from research to analytics.
  • Hiring managers struggle to identify what kind of UX expertise they actually need.
  • Researchers and strategists are often overlooked because their impact isn’t as visible on a screen.

So, rather than chasing the myth of the “unicorn,” the smarter approach is to recognize which lens you lead with and how to collaborate with others who bring the rest.

Different lenses, different brains

The reason these lenses exist isn’t arbitrary — it’s neurological. Some people are naturally wired for analytical, data-driven thinking; others are more attuned to spatial or visual reasoning.

Cognitive scientist Howard Gardner, in his theory of Multiple Intelligences, argued that there isn’t one kind of intelligence but several, from logical–mathematical and linguistic to spatial and interpersonal. That same idea maps perfectly to UX:

  • Those high in spatial or interpersonal intelligence tend to excel in visual design, storytelling, or facilitation, bringing emotion and clarity to complex ideas.
  • Those strong in logical or linguistic intelligence often thrive in research and analysis, happily buried in spreadsheets, transcripts, or behavioral data all day.
  • And those with strategic or intrapersonal intelligence often find themselves drawn to the business lens, connecting patterns, motivations, and outcomes.

Understanding this doesn’t just validate personal preference; it highlights that UX requires different kinds of brains working together. Diversity of thinking isn’t a luxury; it’s the foundation of good design.

How the lenses play out in practice

The UI designer (creativity-led)

UI Designers lead with the creative lens. Their strength lies in turning complex ideas into interfaces that feel intuitive, elegant, and emotionally engaging. But the best UI Designers also understand the science of usability and the business context behind what they’re designing.

Illustration by Oliver West

Example: A UI Designer might use the Creativity lens to craft a clear visual hierarchy, the Science lens to apply principles like color theory, or Gestalt psychology to guide perception, and the Business lens to ensure the design supports key goals such as conversion, clarity, or engagement.

The UX architect (business-led)

UX Architects operate at the intersection of business and science, combining analytical evidence with strategic foresight to define how products achieve both user and organizational goals, focusing not on UI design but on spreadsheets, frameworks, and presentations that translate research, priorities, and systems into a clear, scalable plan for meaningful experience delivery.

Illustration by Oliver West

Example: A UX Architect might use the Science lens to model user behavior and map journeys, and the Business lens to prioritize features, structure information, or design pathways that align with strategic outcomes. The Creativity lens plays a supporting role, helping communicate systems and ideas in ways others can grasp.

The UX researcher (science-led)

UX Researchers bring the science lens to life through evidence, observation, and human understanding. Their work grounds design decisions in reality, not assumptions.

Illustration by Oliver West

Example: A UX Researcher may use the Science lens to uncover unmet needs through interviews, the Creativity lens to frame findings in compelling narratives, and the Business lens to influence stakeholders by linking insights to commercial impact.

The goal isn’t balance; it’s awareness

It’s unrealistic (and unnecessary) to be equally strong in all three lenses. The value lies in awareness: knowing your natural strengths, understanding where you have gaps, and appreciating the perspectives others bring.

A creative mind benefits from learning behavioral science. A strategist gains influence by visualizing ideas clearly. A researcher grows by linking findings to measurable results.

That’s how you move from being good at your craft to being impactful in your career.

Why this perspective matters beyond UX

For hiring managers and recruiters, recognizing these lenses helps in building balanced teams, not just hiring for titles. A well-rounded UX function has representation across all three lenses:

  • Creativity ensures emotional connection.
  • Science ensures behavioral truth.
  • Business ensures commercial impact.

Without that balance, UX risks being seen as either decoration or documentation, neither of which delivers lasting value.

The article originally appeared on LinkedIn.

Featured image courtesy: Michael Dziedzic.

post authorOliver West

Oliver West
Oliver West is a UX leader with over 25 years’ experience designing and shaping digital experiences across Europe, the Middle East, and Asia. Having started his career in 1999 with Goldman Sachs in London and Sydney, he has since run his own digital agency, led global teams for major network agencies, and served as VP of UX & Research for a global trading platform. Across his career, Oliver has helped improve experiences for organisations including Microsoft, NEOM, Coke, General Motors, Virgin Group, and many others. Now based in Dubai, he leads the Customer Experience practice at VML, blending human-centred design with behavioural science. Alongside his client work, Oliver is the founder of UXHQ, an initiative dedicated to giving UX professionals clear, practical guidance in a field often clouded by noise and confusion. As a speaker, author, and mentor, he’s driven by a genuine desire to help the next generation of UXers build confidence, capability, and meaningful careers.

Tweet
Share
Post
Share
Email
Print
Ideas In Brief
  • The article suggests that UX isn’t one skill but three lenses: creativity, science, and business, and different roles naturally lead with different ones.
  • The piece illustrates that impact comes from identifying your skills and developing balanced teams, without trying to be excellent at everything.

Related Articles

Learn when to talk to users, and when to watch them in order to uncover real insights and design experiences that truly work.

Article by Paivi Salminen
Usability Tests vs. Focus Groups
  • The article distinguishes between usability tests and focus groups, highlighting their different roles in UX research.
  • It explains that focus groups gather opinions and attitudes, while usability tests observe real user behavior to find design issues.
  • The piece stresses using each method at the right stage to build the right product and ensure a better user experience.
Share:Usability Tests vs. Focus Groups
2 min read

Explore how design researchers can earn the trust and buy-in that give studies impact, even as AI shifts how teams work.

Article by Sara Fortier
Earning the Right to Research: Stakeholder Buy-In and Influence in the AI x UX Era
  • The article emphasizes that synthetic data and AI tools promise speed, but not the alignment or shared purpose that makes design research effective in solving design problems.
  • It asserts that meaningful human-centred design begins with trust and the permission to conduct research properly (i.e., strategically).
  • The piece outlines how to build stakeholder buy-in for design research through practical strategies that build influence piece by piece within an organization.
  • Adapted from the book Design Research Mastery, it offers grounded ways to enable impactful user studies in today’s AI-driven landscape.
Share:Earning the Right to Research: Stakeholder Buy-In and Influence in the AI x UX Era
12 min read

Explore the future of design: AI-powered interfaces that adapt, stay human-focused, and build trust.

Article by Aroon Kumar
Beyond UI/UX: Designing Adaptive Experiences in the Age of AI
  • The article discusses the shift from fixed interfaces to real-time experiences, switching the role of designers from creating screens to guiding how systems operate.
  • The piece also stresses that, as experiences become personalized, they must maintain user trust, privacy, and authentic human connection.
Share:Beyond UI/UX: Designing Adaptive Experiences in the Age of AI
5 min read

Join the UX Magazine community!

Stay informed with exclusive content on the intersection of UX, AI agents, and agentic automation—essential reading for future-focused professionals.

Hello!

You're officially a member of the UX Magazine Community.
We're excited to have you with us!

Thank you!

To begin viewing member content, please verify your email.

Get Paid to Test AI Products

Earn an average of $100 per test by reviewing AI-first product experiences and sharing your feedback.

    Tell us about you. Enroll in the course.

      This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Check our privacy policy and