Flag

We stand with Ukraine and our team members from Ukraine. Here are ways you can help

Get exclusive access to thought-provoking articles, bonus podcast content, and cutting-edge whitepapers. Become a member of the UX Magazine community today!

Home ›› Design ›› Bring out your dead!

Bring out your dead!

by Rich Nadworny
3 min read
Share this post on
Tweet
Share
Post
Share
Email
Print

Save

In a world of attention-grabbing headlines, it’s more important than ever to critically evaluate claims of “dead” concepts and practices.

Can I tell you how tired I am of reading that this thing or that thing is “dead”? Here’s just a tiny taste of articles from the last year:

Agile is Dead

Social Media Is Dead

Why Digital Transformation Is Dead And It’s Too Late To Cross The Chasm

Design Sprints are dead, long live the AI Sprints?

And this oldie from 2011(!!).

Design Thinking Is A Failed Experiment. So What’s Next?

Every time I see one of these articles, I find them superficial, boring, and lazy. At best.

At worst, someone is declaring something dead to sell you something else. Who wants to buy something that’s dead when you can buy this new shiny object?

Let me tell you what I really think:

I stumbled across this article last week from MIT’s Tech Review:

Design thinking was supposed to fix the world. Where did it go wrong?

I understand that media outlets are in the business of selling advertising and that journalists tend to prefer writing about conflict since it tends to sell (see above). And that the editors, even engineers, are not above the click-bait.

Sadly, this article could have been (should have been) about how a young design thinking discipline (less than 15 years old by Rebecca’s count) is evolving, neededly, in really a pretty short time. All of the ingredients are in the article, but that’s not very sexy journalism.

But the essence of this design discipline: Empathy, testing, iteration — holds true now more than ever. The article is a testament to how human-centered design is applying its own techniques and processes on itself — it’s learning, evolving empathizing and iterating.

I think the only people today who would argue against the Empathy/Testing/Iterate approach are those who have swallowed the Palo Alto Capitalism spin.

Adding systems design into human centered design to account for complexity isn’t new but it’s necessary. Adding ethics into any design system is critical, not only in design thinking. BTW, most of the resistance isn’t from designers — it’s from the decision makers (many with degrees from MIT and Stanford).

Every article declaring something is dead tends to show people reacting this way:
“I believed the hype — I bought it hook, line, and sinker and it turns out NOT to be the unicorns and rainbows mommy promised me!!! So now I’m going to throw a little tantrum.”

Crying baby in black and white
Photo by Zachary Kadolph on Unsplash

Suggestion: don’t believe the hype. A lot of what we want to call “dead” need the time and space to evolve, or to fall by the wayside. When they fall, we usually don’t notice it — there is no flashy funeral or wake.

I think the most exciting part about design and innovation is its evolution and rediscovery — it isn’t a perfect science but through trial and error we make it better and better over time.

I say: Enough with the digital and innovation and design coroners!!

Take Voltaire’s advice and cultivate your own garden rather than tending to your cemetery.

post authorRich Nadworny

Rich Nadworny

Rich is an Innovation Lead at Hello Future in Sweden. Previously he was design drector and co-founder of Savvy Design Collaborative. At present, Rich works with large Swedish institutions to help build and foster cultures of design-driven innovation and human-centered ways of working.

Between 2015-2018 Rich was the Director of Innovation and Entrepreneurship at Dartmouth College’s Dickey Center. He trained African entrepreneurs in the YALI program through his course Design Driven Entrepreneurship.

He has a background in digital marketing and service design through his firm Digalicious and as partner, digital strategist and creative director at the brand agency Kelliher Samets Volk.

Rich teaches human-centered design at the Royal School of Technology (KTH) in Sweden.

He was a commentator on Vermont’s National Public Radio station (VPR) between 2009-2018 and blogged at Huffington Post. He has a B.A. from Dartmouth, an M.S. from Boston University and studied design/innovation at the California College of Arts.

Tweet
Share
Post
Share
Email
Print
Ideas In Brief
  • From author’s perspective, labeling concepts or practices as “dead” has become commonplace, but such claims are often superficial and driven by commercial interests.
  • The media industry tends to favor sensationalism over substantive analysis, which can lead to oversimplification of complex issues.
  • The excitement of design and innovation lies in its evolution and rediscovery, as it continuously gets better through trial and error over time. It’s important to critically evaluate trends and consider the broader context.

Related Articles

Consistency in UI/UX builds trust and efficiency — without it, users feel lost. Learn how top brands maintain it and how AI can help.

Article by Rodolpho Henrique
Consistency in UI/UX Design: The Key to User Satisfaction
  • The article examines the role of consistency in UI/UX design for user trust and efficiency.
  • It showcases visual, functional, and interaction consistency in creating seamless experiences.
  • The piece warns about the negative effects of inconsistency, including confusion and frustration.
  • It promotes the use of AI and design systems to ensure consistency across digital platforms.
Share:Consistency in UI/UX Design: The Key to User Satisfaction
4 min read

If Mobile-First thinking has revolutionized the UX Design industry, AI-First is promising to be an even more spectacular kick in the pants.

Article by Greg Nudelman
The Rise of AI-First Products
  • The article explores how AI-powered operating systems are changing user interactions.
  • It covers AI-driven personalization, automation, and adaptive interfaces.
  • The piece discusses challenges like privacy, over-reliance on AI, and user control.
  • It highlights opportunities to design more intuitive and human-centered AI experiences.
Share:The Rise of AI-First Products
11 min read

AI is reshaping UX, and Figma may be sinking. As AI-driven systems minimize UI, traditional design roles must evolve — or risk becoming obsolete. Are you ready to adapt?

Article by Greg Nudelman
AI Is Flipping UX Upside Down: How to Keep Your UX Job, and Why Figma is a Titanic (It’s not for the Reasons You Think)
  • The article explores the fundamental shift in UX as AI-first systems minimize the role of UI, rendering traditional design tools like Figma increasingly obsolete.
  • It introduces the “Iceberg UX Model,” illustrating how modern AI-driven interfaces prioritize functionality and automation over visual design.
  • The piece argues that UX professionals must shift their focus from UI aesthetics to AI-driven user experience, emphasizing use case validation, AI model integration, and data-informed decision-making.
  • It warns that designers who remain fixated on pixel-perfect layouts risk becoming obsolete, urging them to adapt by engaging in AI-driven UX strategies.
Share:AI Is Flipping UX Upside Down: How to Keep Your UX Job, and Why Figma is a Titanic (It’s not for the Reasons You Think)
7 min read

Join the UX Magazine community!

Stay informed with exclusive content on the intersection of UX, AI agents, and agentic automation—essential reading for future-focused professionals.

Hello!

You're officially a member of the UX Magazine Community.
We're excited to have you with us!

Thank you!

To begin viewing member content, please verify your email.

Tell us about you. Enroll in the course.

    This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Check our privacy policy and