Flag

We stand with Ukraine and our team members from Ukraine. Here are ways you can help

Get exclusive access to thought-provoking articles, bonus podcast content, and cutting-edge whitepapers. Become a member of the UX Magazine community today!

Home ›› Content and Copy ›› A Problem with Passwords #wtfUX

A Problem with Passwords #wtfUX

by Josh Tyson
1 min read
Share this post on
Tweet
Share
Post
Share
Email
Print

Save

When creating a password, it’s nice when a service lets you double check your entry.

Creating passwords can be a stressful experience. Go too famliar (CHILDNAME) and you lose effectiveness, go too obscure (admiralalonzoghostpenis420YOLO) and you’re likely to forget it.

As Edward Snowden recently told John Oliver, “For someone who has a common eight-character password, it can literally take less than a second for the computer to go through the possibilities and pull that password out.”

Snowden reccomends concocting memorable non sequitir phrases like: “margaretthatcheris100%sexy.” Whatever your strategy, you want to make sure the password you enter—one generally obscured by black dots—is exactly what you intend it to be. This leads us to a frustrating bit of wtfUX sent our way by Indrani Stangl

“When I create a new account on a website, I rely on entering the password twice. This is a nice feature in case you are like me, a total spaz. I rarely type it correctly both times and need that safety net to make sure I can log in.”

password wtfUX

“Now the trend seems to be ‘enter a password,’ and once you do, you are logged in. Bad typists, beware. I am all for shortcuts, but this is a dumb one.”

Keep these coming. Send them to us via Twitter or Facebook using the hastag #wtfUX or email them to: [email protected] with “#wtfUX” in the subject line. Include as much context as you can, so we get a full understanding of what the f%*k went wrong.

post authorJosh Tyson

Josh Tyson
Josh Tyson is the co-author of the first bestselling book about conversational AI, Age of Invisible Machines. He is also the Director of Creative Content at OneReach.ai and co-host of both the Invisible Machines and N9K podcasts. His writing has appeared in numerous publications over the years, including Chicago Reader, Fast Company, FLAUNT, The New York Times, Observer, SLAP, Stop Smiling, Thrasher, and Westword. 

Tweet
Share
Post
Share
Email
Print

Related Articles

AI is changing how designers work — speeding up workflows, sparking creativity, and taking care of the tedious parts. But it’s not here to replace designers — it’s here to amplify their insight, empathy, and impact.

Article by Nayyer Abbas
AI Boosts for UI/UX Designers: Fast Growth with Smart Tools
  • The article explores how AI transforms UI/UX design by automating repetitive tasks, speeding up workflows, and enhancing creativity across ideation, prototyping, and research.
  • It argues that AI empowers rather than replaces designers, freeing them to focus on insight, empathy, and strategy while maintaining ethical and user-centered design.
Share:AI Boosts for UI/UX Designers: Fast Growth with Smart Tools
5 min read

AI didn’t just change work — it removed the starting point. This piece explores what happens when early-career jobs vanish, and why the most “future-proof” skills might be the oldest ones.

Article by Pavel Bukengolts
AI, Early-Career Jobs, and the Return to Thinking
  • The article illustrates how AI is quickly taking over beginner-level jobs that involve routine work.
  • The piece argues that the skills that remain most valuable are human ones, like critical thinking, communication, big-picture understanding, and ethics.
  • It suggests that companies must decide whether to replace junior staff with AI or use AI to help train and support them.
Share:AI, Early-Career Jobs, and the Return to Thinking
5 min read

Learn when to talk to users, and when to watch them in order to uncover real insights and design experiences that truly work.

Article by Paivi Salminen
Usability Tests vs. Focus Groups
  • The article distinguishes between usability tests and focus groups, highlighting their different roles in UX research.
  • It explains that focus groups gather opinions and attitudes, while usability tests observe real user behavior to find design issues.
  • The piece stresses using each method at the right stage to build the right product and ensure a better user experience.
Share:Usability Tests vs. Focus Groups
2 min read

Join the UX Magazine community!

Stay informed with exclusive content on the intersection of UX, AI agents, and agentic automation—essential reading for future-focused professionals.

Hello!

You're officially a member of the UX Magazine Community.
We're excited to have you with us!

Thank you!

To begin viewing member content, please verify your email.

Get Paid to Test AI Products

Earn an average of $100 per test by reviewing AI-first product experiences and sharing your feedback.

    Tell us about you. Enroll in the course.

      This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Check our privacy policy and