Flag

We stand with Ukraine and our team members from Ukraine. Here are ways you can help

Get exclusive access to thought-provoking articles, bonus podcast content, and cutting-edge whitepapers. Become a member of the UX Magazine community today!

Home ›› Automotive ›› Which Button to Press at the Pump? #wtfUX

Which Button to Press at the Pump? #wtfUX

by Daniel Brown
2 min read
Share this post on
Tweet
Share
Post
Share
Email
Print

Save

Selecting your octane level at the gas pump should be an easy interaction, but that’s not the world we live in.

Probably one of the most fundamental considerations of user experience is to not make the user feel like an idiot. It’s not a commonly vocalized goal, but is a good “baseline” philosophy—right after “don’t kill your users” and “don’t blow things up.”

Speaking of flammable situations, gas pumps are the kind of device that (almost) all of us interact on a regular basis. It shouldn’t be a complex interaction, but I’m often surprised. Americans love choice, and we get to choose between multiple brands of gasoline and different octane levels. We are confronted, then, with the “fuel dashboard” at the pump.

odd gas panel design

The good: Large, simple graphics make it clear what the options are while the slightly more difficult to read LCD displays let you know what the going (seemingly random) price per-gallon is.

The bad: Some pumps are better at this than others. In this case, the large label with the number tells you the octane level. Since the number defines the choice you’re making, the inclination is to press it. Who could resist that big, yellow target with the number on it?

Except, that’s not what they decided you should press. Instead, just to the right of the LCD is a relatively tiny button which allows you to communicate your choice. That button—which indicates “go” or “proceed”—is set in red of all colors. (Also, a button that contains the word “push” seems a bit redundant and doesn’t specify what pressing it actually does.)

Based on the amount of wear visible on the octane label, it’s clear that other people have tried to do the same thing I did. They made the mistake of thinking that someone thought sufficiently about how to communicate choice.

elegant gas dashboard design at a Shell station

In stark contrast, this pump at a Shell station beautifully combines the octane label with the choice mechanism.

Keep these coming. Send them to us via Twitter or Facebook using the hastag #wtfUX or email them to: [email protected] with “#wtfUX” in the subject line. Include as much context as you can, so we get a full understanding of what the f%*k went wrong. Image of gas pump courtesy Shutterstock.

post authorDaniel Brown

Daniel Brown
Daniel has spent the past 20 years in software companies both large and small. From web design and development for a “boutique” web design firm to Evangelism for Adobe Systems, to helping budding startup companies get a foothold in the market, he’s worn a variety of “hats". Daniel has spoken at a variety of events worldwide including the Sundance Film Festival, Anderson Ranch Arts Center, Santa Fe Digital Workshops, and the Pacific Imaging Center in Hawaii on the topics of web design, digital imaging, photography, and user experience. Daniel currently serves as the head of the interface and user experience department at a small medical software company in Providence, Rhode Island.

Tweet
Share
Post
Share
Email
Print

Related Articles

Unpack how dark patterns manipulate users, why they’re becoming a legal issue, and what ethical designers can do about it.

Article by Tushar Deshmukh
Dark Patterns: When Design Crosses the Line
  • The article makes a clear case: dark patterns aren’t accidents but deliberate design decisions that put business gains over people.
  • The piece reminds us that no short-term conversion bump is worth losing user trust for good.
Share:Dark Patterns: When Design Crosses the Line
7 min read

Learn about common Agile anti-patterns. Lessons from Laura Klein.

Article by Paivi Salminen
Unhappy Agile Teams Are Unhappy in Familiar Ways
  • The article makes a sharp point: struggling Agile teams love to think their problems are unique. They rarely are.
  • It breaks down the traps that quietly kill Agile teams, like endless feature shipping, siloed workflows, and design treated as an afterthought.
  • The piece reminds us that looking Agile and actually being Agile are two very different things.
Share:Unhappy Agile Teams Are Unhappy in Familiar Ways
6 min read

Take a hard look at the fine line between good design and digital dependency.

Article by Tushar Deshmukh
Designing for Dependence: When UX Turns Tools into Traps
  • The article reveals how digital products are no longer just tools. They’re engineered to keep you hooked, often without you realizing it.
  • It challenges designers to ask: Are we building products that serve people, or ones that quietly exploit them?
  • The piece highlights that ethical design isn’t about removing persuasion. It’s about being honest and giving users the freedom to walk away.
Share:Designing for Dependence: When UX Turns Tools into Traps
8 min read

Join the UX Magazine community!

Stay informed with exclusive content on the intersection of UX, AI agents, and agentic automation—essential reading for future-focused professionals.

Hello!

You're officially a member of the UX Magazine Community.
We're excited to have you with us!

Thank you!

To begin viewing member content, please verify your email.

Get Paid to Test AI Products

Earn an average of $100 per test by reviewing AI-first product experiences and sharing your feedback.

    Tell us about you. Enroll in the course.

      This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Check our privacy policy and