Flag

We stand with Ukraine and our team members from Ukraine. Here are ways you can help

Get exclusive access to thought-provoking articles, bonus podcast content, and cutting-edge whitepapers. Become a member of the UX Magazine community today!

Home ›› Automotive ›› Which Button to Press at the Pump? #wtfUX

Which Button to Press at the Pump? #wtfUX

by Daniel Brown
2 min read
Share this post on
Tweet
Share
Post
Share
Email
Print

Save

Selecting your octane level at the gas pump should be an easy interaction, but that’s not the world we live in.

Probably one of the most fundamental considerations of user experience is to not make the user feel like an idiot. It’s not a commonly vocalized goal, but is a good “baseline” philosophy—right after “don’t kill your users” and “don’t blow things up.”

Speaking of flammable situations, gas pumps are the kind of device that (almost) all of us interact on a regular basis. It shouldn’t be a complex interaction, but I’m often surprised. Americans love choice, and we get to choose between multiple brands of gasoline and different octane levels. We are confronted, then, with the “fuel dashboard” at the pump.

odd gas panel design

The good: Large, simple graphics make it clear what the options are while the slightly more difficult to read LCD displays let you know what the going (seemingly random) price per-gallon is.

The bad: Some pumps are better at this than others. In this case, the large label with the number tells you the octane level. Since the number defines the choice you’re making, the inclination is to press it. Who could resist that big, yellow target with the number on it?

Except, that’s not what they decided you should press. Instead, just to the right of the LCD is a relatively tiny button which allows you to communicate your choice. That button—which indicates “go” or “proceed”—is set in red of all colors. (Also, a button that contains the word “push” seems a bit redundant and doesn’t specify what pressing it actually does.)

Based on the amount of wear visible on the octane label, it’s clear that other people have tried to do the same thing I did. They made the mistake of thinking that someone thought sufficiently about how to communicate choice.

elegant gas dashboard design at a Shell station

In stark contrast, this pump at a Shell station beautifully combines the octane label with the choice mechanism.

Keep these coming. Send them to us via Twitter or Facebook using the hastag #wtfUX or email them to: [email protected] with “#wtfUX” in the subject line. Include as much context as you can, so we get a full understanding of what the f%*k went wrong. Image of gas pump courtesy Shutterstock.

post authorDaniel Brown

Daniel Brown
Daniel has spent the past 20 years in software companies both large and small. From web design and development for a “boutique” web design firm to Evangelism for Adobe Systems, to helping budding startup companies get a foothold in the market, he’s worn a variety of “hats". Daniel has spoken at a variety of events worldwide including the Sundance Film Festival, Anderson Ranch Arts Center, Santa Fe Digital Workshops, and the Pacific Imaging Center in Hawaii on the topics of web design, digital imaging, photography, and user experience. Daniel currently serves as the head of the interface and user experience department at a small medical software company in Providence, Rhode Island.

Tweet
Share
Post
Share
Email
Print

Related Articles

Discover why the points, badges, and streaks in your favorite apps aren’t really gamification.

Article by Montgomery Singman
Gamification 2.0. Beyond Points and Badges: Designing for Players, Not Metrics. Chapter 1: The Problem
  • The piece claims that most apps misuse gamification, copying superficial mechanics like points and badges that trick rather than motivate people, and that the experience itself is what truly drives engagement, just like good games do.
Share:Gamification 2.0. Beyond Points and Badges: Designing for Players, Not Metrics. Chapter 1: The Problem
4 min read

Learn why the real design challenge of agile is not speed but learning to design smaller, one valuable slice at a time.

Article by Paivi Salminen
Designing Small Is Harder than Designing Big
  • The article suggests that agile design is not about quick development but rather the more difficult discipline of designing smaller, resisting the temptation to map out complete systems, avoiding the snare of horizontal slicing, and inquiring into what the smallest iteration of an idea is that still provides real value to users.
Share:Designing Small Is Harder than Designing Big
5 min read

Find out how clicking “Accept All” is not really consent and how ethical UX design can return user choice to users.

Article by Tushar Deshmukh
Consent Fatigue: Are We Designing People into Compliance?
  • The article shows that consent fatigue is not a user problem but a design problem in which endless permission popups, visual manipulation, and legal-shield thinking have quietly replaced real user autonomy with engineered compliance.
Share:Consent Fatigue: Are We Designing People into Compliance?
10 min read

Join the UX Magazine community!

Stay informed with exclusive content on the intersection of UX, AI agents, and agentic automation—essential reading for future-focused professionals.

Hello!

You're officially a member of the UX Magazine Community.
We're excited to have you with us!

Thank you!

To begin viewing member content, please verify your email.

Get Paid to Test AI Products

Earn an average of $100 per test by reviewing AI-first product experiences and sharing your feedback.

    Tell us about you. Enroll in the course.

      This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Check our privacy policy and