Flag

We stand with Ukraine and our team members from Ukraine. Here are ways you can help

Become a member

Get exclusive access to thought-provoking articles, bonus podcast content, and cutting-edge whitepapers. Become a member of the UX Magazine community today!

Home ›› Design ›› What Magic Can Teach Us About Empathy in UX

What Magic Can Teach Us About Empathy in UX

by Lukas Mathis
1 min read
Share this post on
Tweet
Share
Post
Share
Email
Print

Save

Jamy Ian Swiss explains how magic and UX live in the same place: the user’s mind.

Great presentation by magician Jamy Ian Swiss, who explains concepts like mental models and storytelling by equating software to magic.

Jamy Ian Swiss at Gel 2009 from Gel Conference.

Jamy Ian Swiss calls himself an “honest liar,” because as a magician, he promises to deceive his audience, and then promptly does. User interface designers are somewhat similar, though probably a bit less honest. We constantly lie to our users about what they actually see. A button on a screen isn’t really a button, it’s a bunch of colored dots. The better we lie to users, to more easily we can convince them that it actually is a button.

So while we may not be as honest as magicians, our lies nevertheless are in the user’s best interest.

post authorLukas Mathis

Lukas Mathis
Lukas Mathis works as a software engineer and user interface designer for a Swiss software company creating workflow management software. He lives in a small village in a remote part of the Swiss Alps. Visit Lukas' website at https://.ignorethecode.net/ or follow him on Twitter @LKM.

Tweet
Share
Post
Share
Email
Print

Related Articles

Acquired Savant Syndrome in Design: Skill, Obsession, or Exploitation?

  • Behavioral Design, Cognitive Science, Design Ethics, Empathy, Ethical UX Series, Neuroscience, Psychology and Human Behavior, UX Design, UX Research

Find out how UX culture mistakes burnout for brilliance and what it’s really costing designers, researchers, and the products they build.

Article by Tushar Deshmukh
IDEAS IN BRIEF
Acquired Savant Syndrome in Design: Skill, Obsession, or Exploitation?
  • The piece explores the metaphorical parallels between acquired savant syndrome and modern UX culture, arguing that the industry dangerously romanticizes obsession and burnout-driven brilliance over sustainable skill and calling on designers, researchers, and leaders to redefine excellence through ethical, well-paced, and mentally healthy creative practice.
Read Article →
Share
Share:Acquired Savant Syndrome in Design: Skill, Obsession, or Exploitation?
6 min read

Gamification or Manipulation? Understanding the Ethics of Engagement Loops

  • Behavioral Design, Ethical Design, Ethical UX Series, Product Design, UX Design

Examine the boundaries of engagement and envision the ideal ethical design.

Article by Tushar Deshmukh
IDEAS IN BRIEF
Gamification or Manipulation? Understanding the Ethics of Engagement Loops
  • The article examines the fine line between ethical gamification and psychological manipulation in UX design, contrasting harmful engagement loops, such as Snapchat streaks and casino-style mobile games, with genuinely empowering examples like Duolingo and Khan Academy, while offering designers a framework of ethical questions to ensure their work elevates users rather than exploits them.
Read Article →
Share
Share:Gamification or Manipulation? Understanding the Ethics of Engagement Loops
5 min read

The Psychology of Defaults: How Pre-Selected Options Influence Behavior

  • Behavioral Design, Design Ethics, Ethical UX Series, Psychology and Human Behavior, User Psychology, UX Design

Find out how pre-selected options silently shape decisions, and what ethical designers must do about it.

Article by Tushar Deshmukh
IDEAS IN BRIEF
The Psychology of Defaults: How Pre-Selected Options Influence Behavior
  • The article argues that defaults quietly guide user decisions through inaction, making them far more powerful than most designers realize.
  • It highlights that they work by exploiting natural human tendencies like status quo bias and the assumption that pre-selected options are “recommended.”
  • The piece emphasizes that ethical design doesn’t eliminate defaults but uses them transparently, with user intent and easy reversibility at the core.
Read Article →
Share
Share:The Psychology of Defaults: How Pre-Selected Options Influence Behavior
5 min read
✕

Join the UX Magazine community!

Stay informed with exclusive content on the intersection of UX, AI agents, and agentic automation—essential reading for future-focused professionals.

Hello!

You're officially a member of the UX Magazine Community.
We're excited to have you with us!

Thank you!

To begin viewing member content, please verify your email.

✕

Get Paid to Test AI Products

Earn an average of $100 per test by reviewing AI-first product experiences and sharing your feedback.

    Tell us about you. Enroll in the course.

      ✕

      This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Check our privacy policy and

      Accept policy