Flag

We stand with Ukraine and our team members from Ukraine. Here are ways you can help

Get exclusive access to thought-provoking articles, bonus podcast content, and cutting-edge whitepapers. Become a member of the UX Magazine community today!

Home ›› Content and Copy ›› UX Design Begins With Content. Don’t Outsource It to AI

UX Design Begins With Content. Don’t Outsource It to AI

by Pavel Samsonov
2 min read
Share this post on
Tweet
Share
Post
Share
Email
Print

Save

As if AI-generated “user research” wasn’t bad enough, now I am seeing designers advance LLMs for generating UI content – forgetting the most important design adage, “form follows function.” The digital equivalent is not the function of clicking the button but the function of *accessing the content.*

All the way back in 2002, Jesse James Garrett created this incredible model, which I use frequently to structure my work. And to explain to junior designers the extent of the depth they need to consider, because 22 years after this was published few of them even know what a “hypertext system” even is, and envision their work exclusively as a software interface.

Without both of these pillars, your UX design will fall over.

Some UXers understand this partially – but think that the interface is “more important” and the content can come afterward. These are the people who champion ChatGPT as a great alternative to Lorem Ipsum. And they repeat the same mantra as every designer who invites AI into their workflow: “It’s just for now, we will fix it later.”

You will *not* be able to fix it later.

The elements you are generating are *foundational* to the way the product is used. They are not stacked on top. If you decide to outsource your thinking about the hypertext system, redoing it will require ripping out the guts of the software interface layers you have built in parallel.

The content – not the beautiful scroll animations – is the thing people use your product for. It is not lesser than. It is not an afterthought. It even has its own set of roles (content design, UX writing, information architecture, etc).

The content is the scaffolding of the experience. When you minimize it, it is only to your own detriment.

post authorPavel Samsonov

Pavel Samsonov
Pavel Samsonov is a New York-based UX leader exploring the applications of design as a decision-making framework for all areas of product development. He currently builds design practice and leads innovation engagements at AWS. His approach to product & design draws on his experience managing enterprise product teams at Bloomberg, design-driven rapid prototyping in the start-up world, traditional graphic design education, and an academic background in human-computer interaction.

Tweet
Share
Post
Share
Email
Print
Ideas In Brief
  • The article emphasizes the critical importance of content in UX design, warning against the reliance on AI-generated content and underscoring the foundational role content plays in the user experience.

Related Articles

Learn how to build systems where design explicitly models development, handoff is automatic, and AI can extend your work reliably.

Article by Jim Gulsen
Your Design System Works in Figma. Does It Work in Code?
  • The article explains why many design systems don’t work well: designs made in Figma don’t translate well into code.
  • It introduces five practices: structure frames like code, use fewer components with more variants, organize by how both designers and developers actually work, let AI check your naming, and build documentation into your daily workflow.
  • The piece says that good design systems are the same in design and development, and when they match, everything just works.
Share:Your Design System Works in Figma. Does It Work in Code?
6 min read

Find out how to stop building where the data is bright and start building where the problem actually is.

Article by Núria Badia Comas
Stop Building Streetlamp Models: The Decision-First Framework for AI Products
  • The article reveals that most AI projects fail because teams focus on what’s possible instead of what users actually need.
  • It introduces the AI-Question Framework, asking three key questions: Does it matter? Do you have the data? Can you handle the mistakes?
  • The piece concludes that successful AI products start with the right question, not with what the AI can do.
Share:Stop Building Streetlamp Models: The Decision-First Framework for AI Products
5 min read

Learn why your UX career is safe from AI and which human skills will keep you relevant as things change in the industry.

Article by Pavel Bukengolts
Design Smarter: Future-Proof Your UX Career in the Age of AI
  • The article reassures UX designers that AI won’t replace them; it will change their tools, but not their purpose.
  • The piece emphasizes that, unlike humans, AI is not able to understand people, think critically, or ask important ethical questions.
  • It concludes that UX isn’t disappearing and that humans will always be needed to design products for other humans.
Share:Design Smarter: Future-Proof Your UX Career in the Age of AI
3 min read

Join the UX Magazine community!

Stay informed with exclusive content on the intersection of UX, AI agents, and agentic automation—essential reading for future-focused professionals.

Hello!

You're officially a member of the UX Magazine Community.
We're excited to have you with us!

Thank you!

To begin viewing member content, please verify your email.

Get Paid to Test AI Products

Earn an average of $100 per test by reviewing AI-first product experiences and sharing your feedback.

    Tell us about you. Enroll in the course.

      This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Check our privacy policy and