As if AI-generated “user research” wasn’t bad enough, now I am seeing designers advance LLMs for generating UI content – forgetting the most important design adage, “form follows function.” The digital equivalent is not the function of clicking the button but the function of *accessing the content.*
All the way back in 2002, Jesse James Garrett created this incredible model, which I use frequently to structure my work. And to explain to junior designers the extent of the depth they need to consider, because 22 years after this was published few of them even know what a “hypertext system” even is, and envision their work exclusively as a software interface.
Without both of these pillars, your UX design will fall over.
Some UXers understand this partially – but think that the interface is “more important” and the content can come afterward. These are the people who champion ChatGPT as a great alternative to Lorem Ipsum. And they repeat the same mantra as every designer who invites AI into their workflow: “It’s just for now, we will fix it later.”
You will *not* be able to fix it later.
The elements you are generating are *foundational* to the way the product is used. They are not stacked on top. If you decide to outsource your thinking about the hypertext system, redoing it will require ripping out the guts of the software interface layers you have built in parallel.
The content – not the beautiful scroll animations – is the thing people use your product for. It is not lesser than. It is not an afterthought. It even has its own set of roles (content design, UX writing, information architecture, etc).
The content is the scaffolding of the experience. When you minimize it, it is only to your own detriment.
- Artificial Intelligence, Brain-Computer Interfaces, Consciousness, Human-Machine Integration, Neuroplasticity, Neuroscience, Neurotechnology
What if your brain could merge with a computer? BCIs are revolutionizing healing, learning, and thinking — but with risks like privacy threats and loss of autonomy. Explore the future of merged consciousness and how to harness it wisely.
Article by Oliver Inderwildi
Navigating the Convergence of Mind & Machine: On the Neural Frontier & the Implications of Merged Consciousness
- The article explores how brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) are pushing the neural frontier, enabling breakthroughs in treating neurological disorders, enhancing human, cognition, and ultimately increasing our understanding of the brain’s functioning.
- The piece defines the concept of merged consciousness and discusses its ethical and societal risks, including loss of autonomy, data privacy concerns, and potential socioeconomic divides.
- It highlights the role of neuroplasticity in human-computer interaction, showing how feedback loops from technology accelerate learning and adaptation.
- It calls for innovative policymaking to balance rapid technological advancements with safeguards, ensuring BCIs benefit humanity without compromising our future
Share:Navigating the Convergence of Mind & Machine: On the Neural Frontier & the Implications of Merged Consciousness
Share this link
- February 18, 2025
16 min read