Flag

We stand with Ukraine and our team members from Ukraine. Here are ways you can help

Get exclusive access to thought-provoking articles, bonus podcast content, and cutting-edge whitepapers. Become a member of the UX Magazine community today!

Home ›› Artificial Intelligence ›› Open vs Closed: a Critical Question for Designing and Building Experiences

Member-only story

Open vs Closed: a Critical Question for Designing and Building Experiences

by Josh Tyson
8 min read
Share this post on
Tweet
Share
Post
Share
Email
Print

Save

As we careen into the era of conversational AI and hyperautomation, closed systems create bad experiences that stifle innovation and opportunity

Maybe you’ve seen the meme knocking around the internet: a photo of British octogenarian David Latimer who bottled a handful of seeds in a glass carboy in 1960 and left it largely untouched for almost 50 years (uncorking it only once, in 1972, to add a little water). His 10-gallon garden created its own miniature ecosystem, and has thrived for more than half a century. [1]

In the realm of technology, closed platforms are like Latimer’s terrarium: they can be highly functional, beautiful, and awe inspiring, but they can only grow as big as their bottles. The current business landscape, however—with businesses attempting to sequence as many innovative technologies as possible, as quickly as possible, to automate business processes, workflows, tasks, and communications—requires an architecture that breaks out well beyond these glass walls.

For something like the original iPhone, a terrarium was just fine. Everything a user needed to enjoy its functionalities was baked right into the original version of iOS. Keeping the system closed ensured the quality of the apps and created a seamless overall experience, which contributed to its success, despite the fact that it didn’t have nearly as much functionality as other mobile devices at the time.

Become a member to read the whole content.

Become a member
post authorJosh Tyson

Josh Tyson
Josh Tyson is the co-author of the first bestselling book about conversational AI, Age of Invisible Machines. He is also the Director of Creative Content at OneReach.ai and co-host of both the Invisible Machines and N9K podcasts. His writing has appeared in numerous publications over the years, including Chicago Reader, Fast Company, FLAUNT, The New York Times, Observer, SLAP, Stop Smiling, Thrasher, and Westword. 

Tweet
Share
Post
Share
Email
Print

Related Articles

Find out how to stop building where the data is bright and start building where the problem actually is.

Article by Núria Badia Comas
Stop Building Streetlamp Models: The Decision-First Framework for AI Products
  • The article reveals that most AI projects fail because teams focus on what’s possible instead of what users actually need.
  • It introduces the AI-Question Framework, asking three key questions: Does it matter? Do you have the data? Can you handle the mistakes?
  • The piece concludes that successful AI products start with the right question, not with what the AI can do.
Share:Stop Building Streetlamp Models: The Decision-First Framework for AI Products
5 min read

Learn why your UX career is safe from AI and which human skills will keep you relevant as things change in the industry.

Article by Pavel Bukengolts
Design Smarter: Future-Proof Your UX Career in the Age of AI
  • The article reassures UX designers that AI won’t replace them; it will change their tools, but not their purpose.
  • The piece emphasizes that, unlike humans, AI is not able to understand people, think critically, or ask important ethical questions.
  • It concludes that UX isn’t disappearing and that humans will always be needed to design products for other humans.
Share:Design Smarter: Future-Proof Your UX Career in the Age of AI
3 min read

Learn how we might plan a career in a field without a ladder.

Article by Diana N.
Where Are Conversation Designers Now?
  • The article overviews careers in conversation design and shows that there’s no clear path forward in this field.
  • It identifies three waves of conversation designers: the early pioneers (1980s-2009), those hired during the boom years (2010-2019), and today’s designers facing layoffs and AI-driven changes (2020-now).
  • The piece represents data revealing that 84% of conversation designers who stayed in tech remained in design-related roles, contradicting the assumption that most would leave the field entirely.
Share:Where Are Conversation Designers Now?
8 min read

Join the UX Magazine community!

Stay informed with exclusive content on the intersection of UX, AI agents, and agentic automation—essential reading for future-focused professionals.

Hello!

You're officially a member of the UX Magazine Community.
We're excited to have you with us!

Thank you!

To begin viewing member content, please verify your email.

Get Paid to Test AI Products

Earn an average of $100 per test by reviewing AI-first product experiences and sharing your feedback.

    Tell us about you. Enroll in the course.

      This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Check our privacy policy and