Flag

We stand with Ukraine and our team members from Ukraine. Here are ways you can help

Get exclusive access to thought-provoking articles, bonus podcast content, and cutting-edge whitepapers. Become a member of the UX Magazine community today!

Home ›› Artificial Intelligence ›› Open vs Closed: a Critical Question for Designing and Building Experiences

Member-only story

Open vs Closed: a Critical Question for Designing and Building Experiences

by Josh Tyson
8 min read
Share this post on
Tweet
Share
Post
Share
Email
Print

Save

As we careen into the era of conversational AI and hyperautomation, closed systems create bad experiences that stifle innovation and opportunity

Maybe you’ve seen the meme knocking around the internet: a photo of British octogenarian David Latimer who bottled a handful of seeds in a glass carboy in 1960 and left it largely untouched for almost 50 years (uncorking it only once, in 1972, to add a little water). His 10-gallon garden created its own miniature ecosystem, and has thrived for more than half a century. [1]

In the realm of technology, closed platforms are like Latimer’s terrarium: they can be highly functional, beautiful, and awe inspiring, but they can only grow as big as their bottles. The current business landscape, however—with businesses attempting to sequence as many innovative technologies as possible, as quickly as possible, to automate business processes, workflows, tasks, and communications—requires an architecture that breaks out well beyond these glass walls.

For something like the original iPhone, a terrarium was just fine. Everything a user needed to enjoy its functionalities was baked right into the original version of iOS. Keeping the system closed ensured the quality of the apps and created a seamless overall experience, which contributed to its success, despite the fact that it didn’t have nearly as much functionality as other mobile devices at the time.

Become a member to read the whole content.

Become a member
post authorJosh Tyson

Josh Tyson
Josh Tyson is the co-author of the first bestselling book about conversational AI, Age of Invisible Machines. He is also the Director of Creative Content at OneReach.ai and co-host of both the Invisible Machines and N9K podcasts. His writing has appeared in numerous publications over the years, including Chicago Reader, Fast Company, FLAUNT, The New York Times, Observer, SLAP, Stop Smiling, Thrasher, and Westword. 

Tweet
Share
Post
Share
Email
Print

Related Articles

The “3-in-a-box” era is dead. In an AI-first world, hand-offs kill products — only Snowball teams that build, test, and code together will survive.

Article by Greg Nudelman
Snowball Killed the Dev-Star: Stop Handing Off, Start Succeeding in the AI-First World
  • The article calls for the “Snowball model”: cross-functional teams building, coding, and testing with real users together from day one.
  • It argues that in AI-first UX, “design is how it works” — requiring designers, PMs, and devs to collapse silos, share ownership, and even code collaboratively.
Share:Snowball Killed the Dev-Star: Stop Handing Off, Start Succeeding in the AI-First World
11 min read

AI isn’t replacing designers — it’s making them unstoppable. From personalization to prototyping, discover how AI is redefining the future of UX.

Article by Nayyer Abbas
AI in UX Design: How Artificial Intelligence is Shaping User Experiences
  • The article shows how AI enhances designers rather than replacing them.
  • It highlights AI’s role in personalization, research, prototyping, and accessibility.
  • The piece concludes that AI amplifies human creativity and drives better user experiences and business growth.
Share:AI in UX Design: How Artificial Intelligence is Shaping User Experiences
3 min read

Discover how AI can truly empower professionals, guide decisions, and seamlessly integrate into workflows, making work smarter, not harder.

Article by Mauricio Cardenas
The Quintessential Truths of How to Shape AI as a Business Product Integrator Instead of Generative Facilitators
  • The article argues that AI should act as a business product integrator, not just a generative facilitator.
  • It also emphasizes guiding users, building trust through transparency, improving efficiency, and handling edge cases gracefully.
  • The piece highlights real-world examples where AI-enhanced workflows, supported decision-making, and strengthened professional confidence.
  • It concludes that AI’s true value lies in integration, context-awareness, and UX, transforming processes rather than impressing with novelty.
Share:The Quintessential Truths of How to Shape AI as a Business Product Integrator Instead of Generative Facilitators
5 min read

Join the UX Magazine community!

Stay informed with exclusive content on the intersection of UX, AI agents, and agentic automation—essential reading for future-focused professionals.

Hello!

You're officially a member of the UX Magazine Community.
We're excited to have you with us!

Thank you!

To begin viewing member content, please verify your email.

Tell us about you. Enroll in the course.

    This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Check our privacy policy and