We stand with Ukraine and our team members from Ukraine.

The Community Of Over 640,000

Home ›› Design ›› Design Thinking With Yoda

Design Thinking With Yoda

by Rich Nadworny
4 min read
Share this post on
Tweet
Share
Post
Share
Email
Print

Save

Design thinking with Yoda

Is Yoda truly the real groundwork of design thinking? Here is what we’re about to find out.

We’ve all had that feeling that design thinking was…special. There is something…indescribable about it. It feels like when we do it well, we are tapping into an amazingly powerful…force.

I know that the Kelley brothers and Tim Brown and others would like to lay claim to the popularity of design thinking, and they have played an incredible even critical role in the widespread use of design thinking.

But based on my recent research, I think it’s safe to say that we can find the real groundwork of design thinking in the period between 1977–1985, lain by none other than Yoda. Yes, believe it or not, many of the main principles of design thinking are right there in front of our eyes and ears on the silver screen. Maybe the real genius of the IDEO crew was to watch and re-watch the original Star Wars movies (and yes, maybe using some illicit materials helped, who knows).

Follow me for a deeper dive through some pearls of design thinking wisdom from Yoda:

“Truly wonderful, the mind of a child is.”

“You must unlearn what you have learned.”

– Yoda

Sound familiar? That’s because in design thinking we call this “Beginner’s mindset” something we try to achieve or attain during our process. Why?

”Designers (as humans in general) tend to carry some baggage in regard to some situations, challenges, problems, and opportunities — think of these things as shortcuts in a sense makers toolkit. These prior experiences, perceptions, assumptions, misconceptions, and stereotypes can restrict the amount of empathy a designer is able to build for his or her users. Assume a beginner’s mindset in order to put aside these biases, so that you can approach a design challenge afresh.”

“The greatest teacher, failure is.” — Yoda

David Kelley famously said, “fail faster to succeed sooner.” Bernie Roth said, “Design thinking is to…not have a fear of failure.” Or as Stanford professor Bob Sutton and IDEO Partner Diego Rodriguez often say at the d.school, “Failure sucks, but instructs.”

“Many of the truths that we cling to depend on our point of view.” — Yoda

That sounds a lot like the foundation of design thinking — empathy — to see things from other peoples’ perspectives and to disabuse ourselves of our deeply seated biases.

“The main tenet of design thinking is empathy for the people you’re trying to design for.” David Kelley

Empathy is the first step in design thinking because it is a skill that allows us to understand and share the same feelings that others feel. Through empathy, we are able to put ourselves in other people’s shoes and connect with how they might be feeling about their problem, circumstance, or situation.

“Difficult to see. Always in motion is the future.” — Yoda

The most common question at the start of many design thinking projects is “What will the result be?” When we answer “We don’t know, yet” that causes some execs to get really nervous. Conversely when managers want to use design thinking to deliver a completely expected result — well, that’s when sparks might fly. Because in design thinking we accept that we can’t see the future.

Tom and David Kelley said, “Besides speeding up that process of experimentation, prototypes are easy to throw away when they fail. Creativity requires cycling lots of ideas. The more you invest in your prototype and the closer to “final” it is, the harder it is to let go of a concept that’s not working.”

I think Damian Newman’s Design Squiggle best describes design thinking and the future:

Design Thinking With Yoda. Chaotic waves.

“Do or do not. There is no try.” — Yoda

Even though we call it design thinking it is mostly design doing. Take this quote from Bernie Roth, Founder of Hasso Plattner Institute of Design (the d.school) at Stanford University:

Design thinking is to have a bias toward action.”

Doing is design thinking. It is an experiential practice, not an academic one Even though Bernie Roth himself tried to hedge that and even claimed that Yoda was wrong! It’s why we see books named “Service Design Doing”…

And finally, for those of us design thinkers who continue on to spread the word, teach and lead people and try to change organizational behavior despite meeting resistance from every which way:

“You think Yoda stops teaching, just because his student does not want to hear? A teacher Yoda is. Yoda teaches like drunkards drink, like killers kill.” — Yoda

Well, maybe not the killer part. But good design thinkers do and teach others and we are driven to do so because it why we chose to focus on design thinking in the first. We see design thinking as a force for good, a force for change. We see it as a way of showing the interconnectedness of people to create a better life, business, or world. And we want and hope that everyone would work this way. Why wouldn’t they?

Did someone say Hidden Sith?

Design thinking and Yoda. It was always so obvious…

post authorRich Nadworny

Rich Nadworny,

Rich is the Design Director and co-founder of Savvy Design Collaborative. At present, Rich works with large Swedish institutions to help build and foster cultures of design-driven innovation and human-centered ways of working. He is the design thinking expert teaching sustainability innovation for the Swedish Institute’s Management program for Africa and Northeastern Europe. He teaches design thinking at the Royal Engineering School (KTH) and is a regular lecturer on creativity and innovations at Uppsala University’s sustainability department CEMUS. Between 2015-2018 Rich was the Director of Innovation and Entrepreneurship at Dartmouth College’s Dickey Center. He trained African entrepreneurs in the YALI program through his course Design Driven Entrepreneurship. He has previously worked as the capacity building lead at the service design firm Transformator and started and ran his own human centered design firm Empatico. He has a background in digital marketing and service design through his firm Digalicious and as partner, digital strategist and creative director at the brand agency Kelliher Samets Volk. He was a commentator on Vermont’s National Public Radio station (VPR) and blogged at Huffington Post. He has a B.A. from Dartmouth, an M.S. from Boston University and studied design/innovation at the California College of Arts

Tweet
Share
Post
Share
Email
Print
Ideas In Brief
  • The author explains why he believes Yoda lays the real groundwork for design thinking.
  • Design thinking is a force for good, a force for change, it is a way of showing the interconnectedness of people to create a better life, business, or world.

Related Articles

Tips on how to champion HCD and design research to stakeholders and get them on board with all of your UX processes.

How to Champion HCD and Design Research to Stakeholders
  • The article covers:
    • The importance of stakeholder management
    • Challenges to overcome with research resisters
    • Common objections to doing user research and how to respond
Share:How to Champion HCD and Design Research to Stakeholders
8 min read
How to Champion HCD and Design Research to Stakeholders

Curious to know about a philosophy that liberates our innate need for control? Then read to find out.

A Philosophy for Systems Change
  • The author talks about the nature of systems change and unpacks the following ideas:
    • Dynamics of Change: Our Situations Devolve and Evolve
    • Wabi-Sabi: A Design Philosophy for Complexity
    • Social Systems: The Beauty of Imperfect, Impermanent, and Incomplete Information
    • Social Systems: The Beauty of Modest and Humble Learning
    • Social Systems: The Beauty of Unconventional Thinking
Share:A Philosophy for Systems Change
5 min read
A Philosophy for Systems Change

Technology makes seemingly inconvenient tasks easier — but at what cost?

The Value of Inconvenient Design
  • The article covers the problem of friction and its impact on design.
  • The author explains the problem friction brings to design value based on examples of IKEA, Facebook and Amazon.
Share:The Value of Inconvenient Design
8 min read
The Value of Inconvenient Design

This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Check our privacy policy and