Flag

We stand with Ukraine and our team members from Ukraine. Here are ways you can help

Get exclusive access to thought-provoking articles, bonus podcast content, and cutting-edge whitepapers. Become a member of the UX Magazine community today!

Home ›› Artificial Intelligence ›› A Case of Accidental Anthropomorphism

A Case of Accidental Anthropomorphism

3 min read
Share this post on
Tweet
Share
Post
Share
Email
Print

Save

AccidentalAnthro_LeadBannerNew

Wherein a broken coffee grinder provides lessons in empathy.

Making a pot of coffee is one of my favorite morning rituals. After assembling my AeroPress, I set the kettle on and push the start button on my trusty Cuisinart burr grinder. It was a hand-me-down from a friend, so I’ve always had a soft spot for the device, but recently it endeared itself to me even more.

How? By not working properly. 

Once or twice a month, when I press the start button, it makes one belabored turn and then stops. I’ve discovered that if I hold down the start button and slide the lever that selects the grind duration back and forth, I can spur it to try harder. It’s almost like I can hear the machine grunting as it labors to get moving. Sometimes I’ll even dive to the bottom of the bean funnel with the AeroPress’ stirring paddle to move the beans around and give it more help.

Once it finally gains some momentum, it springs back to life, grinding as good as ever. I’ll think it’s somehow healed itself, but then, a week or two later, it will need my help again. 

My wife has suggested we get a new grinder, but now that seems impossible. The grinder that was once a cold but reliable machine has taken on a decidedly human trait: it needs my encouragement.

The realization that I now have a deep emotional bond with a coffee grinder got me thinking about anthropomorphism in design—specifically about how a product’s shortcomings can create opportunities to engender empathy. Conversational design in particular provides some great potential use cases.

Imagine a customer is interacting with an intelligent digital worker (IDW) or chatbot, trying to get help with an order.

CUSTOMER: I need help. I received my order in the mail but only part of it was delivered.

IDW: Let me see if I can help. What was the order number?

CUSTOMER: It was order number 12345. I placed the order last week.

IDW: It looks like you ordered a set of hand-dipped candles and a 4’ pewter wizard, is that right?

CUSTOMER: That’s correct. The candles arrived, but I have no pewter wizard.

IDW: Ok. I’ll connect you with a customer service agent.

That’s not a terrible script, but what if the IDW was more forthright about it’s shortcomings?

IDW: It looks like you ordered a set of hand-dipped candles and a 4’ pewter wizard, is that right?

CUSTOMER: That’s correct. The candles arrived, but I have no pewter wizard.

IDW: I’m sorry to hear about your missing pewter wizard. Let me see if I can help.

CUSTOMER: Ok.

IDW: Hmmm it looks like sometimes items weighing more than 50lbs are shipped using a different carrier. This isn’t something that I can confirm, but I’m connecting you with a service representative now.

CUSTOMER: Thank you … friend.

That’s a subtle shift, but sometimes knowing that a machine is trying to do its best can have meaning. An unexpected dash of anthropomorphism can brighten an experience, create a sense of connection, increase brand loyalty, and even make a cup of coffee taste that much better.

Tweet
Share
Post
Share
Email
Print

Related Articles

Hiring is automated. The tools built to help you keep up are making it worse. There’s another way — one that puts your data, your drafts, and your decisions back in your hands.

Article by Pavel Bukengolts
Job Search Terminal: A Local-First Tool for an AI-Shaped Job Market
  • The piece argues that most AI job search utilities deal with the wrong problem: they only lower barriers for candidates and perpetuate existing power imbalances.
  • It contends that the choice of local-first, people-centered tools is a political position on professional data ownership, not simply a technical decision.
Share:Job Search Terminal: A Local-First Tool for an AI-Shaped Job Market
5 min read

For researchers, AI tools are making the move from advising to building easier than ever. But the real obstacle was never technical. Meet the researchers who allowed themselves to create — and what the cost was.

Article by James Lang
The New Makers
  • The article says that becoming a maker as a researcher is less about learning new tools or skills and more about giving yourself a new identity, and that without fixing the internal permission structures that define your swim lane, even the most democratized AI tools won’t turn a researcher into a maker — you don’t have a founder; you have a frustrated advisor with a prototype.
Share:The New Makers
20 min read

Learn why shipping AI features is the easy part and what it takes to get people to trust them.

Article by Anina Botha
Making the Invisible, Visible: 6 Months of Diving Deeper into AI
  • The piece states that building AI features is easy. But building them on purpose, turning invisible human behaviors like trust and bias into deliberate design choices, is where the work lives.
Share:Making the Invisible, Visible: 6 Months of Diving Deeper into AI
4 min read

Join the UX Magazine community!

Stay informed with exclusive content on the intersection of UX, AI agents, and agentic automation—essential reading for future-focused professionals.

Hello!

You're officially a member of the UX Magazine Community.
We're excited to have you with us!

Thank you!

To begin viewing member content, please verify your email.

Get Paid to Test AI Products

Earn an average of $100 per test by reviewing AI-first product experiences and sharing your feedback.

    Tell us about you. Enroll in the course.

      This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Check our privacy policy and