Flag

We stand with Ukraine and our team members from Ukraine. Here are ways you can help

Become a member

Get exclusive access to thought-provoking articles, bonus podcast content, and cutting-edge whitepapers. Become a member of the UX Magazine community today!

Home ›› Design ›› What Magic Can Teach Us About Empathy in UX

What Magic Can Teach Us About Empathy in UX

by Lukas Mathis
1 min read
Share this post on
Tweet
Share
Post
Share
Email
Print

Save

Jamy Ian Swiss explains how magic and UX live in the same place: the user’s mind.

Great presentation by magician Jamy Ian Swiss, who explains concepts like mental models and storytelling by equating software to magic.

Jamy Ian Swiss at Gel 2009 from Gel Conference.

Jamy Ian Swiss calls himself an “honest liar,” because as a magician, he promises to deceive his audience, and then promptly does. User interface designers are somewhat similar, though probably a bit less honest. We constantly lie to our users about what they actually see. A button on a screen isn’t really a button, it’s a bunch of colored dots. The better we lie to users, to more easily we can convince them that it actually is a button.

So while we may not be as honest as magicians, our lies nevertheless are in the user’s best interest.

post authorLukas Mathis

Lukas Mathis
Lukas Mathis works as a software engineer and user interface designer for a Swiss software company creating workflow management software. He lives in a small village in a remote part of the Swiss Alps. Visit Lukas' website at https://.ignorethecode.net/ or follow him on Twitter @LKM.

Tweet
Share
Post
Share
Email
Print

Related Articles

The Agile Trap Designers Fall into: Feeding the Beast

  • Agile, Agile UX, Design Systems, Design Thinking, Product Design, UX Design, UX Strategy

Another lesson from studying UX with Laura Klein.

Article by Paivi Salminen
IDEAS IN BRIEF
The Agile Trap Designers Fall into: Feeding the Beast
  • Agile teams are fast, but designers get stuck in an infinite loop of visual work: redesigning the same components over and over instead of solving real UX problems.
  • Design systems break that cycle, defining the building blocks once, freeing designers to focus on how the product works, not how it looks.
  • When the basics are in place, teams can start working together sooner, prototype faster, and release incremental features without the interface falling apart.
Read Article →
Share
Share:The Agile Trap Designers Fall into: Feeding the Beast
4 min read

Gamification 2.0. Beyond Points and Badges: Designing for Players, Not Metrics. Conclusion

  • Behavioral Design, Game Design, Gamification Series, Human-Centered Design, Product Design, User Experience, UX Design

Real engagement is about designing experiences that people want to have. Here are some things that games do well that most apps don’t.

Article by Montgomery Singman
IDEAS IN BRIEF
Gamification 2.0. Beyond Points and Badges: Designing for Players, Not Metrics. Conclusion
  • Most apps use gamification as a manipulation layer to drive metrics, but people engage with things that are truly worthy of their time, not points or streak guilt.
  • Apps that people stick with do this by designing for intrinsic motivation, making the experience itself rewarding.
  • The true measure of success is whether users feel more capable, accomplished, and enriched for having used your app.
Read Article →
Share
Share:Gamification 2.0. Beyond Points and Badges: Designing for Players, Not Metrics. Conclusion
8 min read

The New Makers

  • Artificial Intelligence, Career, Future of Work, Product Design, Technology, UX Design, UX Research

For researchers, AI tools are making the move from advising to building easier than ever. But the real obstacle was never technical. Meet the researchers who allowed themselves to create — and what the cost was.

Article by James Lang
IDEAS IN BRIEF
The New Makers
  • The article says that becoming a maker as a researcher is less about learning new tools or skills and more about giving yourself a new identity, and that without fixing the internal permission structures that define your swim lane, even the most democratized AI tools won’t turn a researcher into a maker — you don’t have a founder; you have a frustrated advisor with a prototype.
Read Article →
Share
Share:The New Makers
20 min read
✕

Join the UX Magazine community!

Stay informed with exclusive content on the intersection of UX, AI agents, and agentic automation—essential reading for future-focused professionals.

Hello!

You're officially a member of the UX Magazine Community.
We're excited to have you with us!

Thank you!

To begin viewing member content, please verify your email.

✕

Get Paid to Test AI Products

Earn an average of $100 per test by reviewing AI-first product experiences and sharing your feedback.

    Tell us about you. Enroll in the course.

      ✕

      This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Check our privacy policy and

      Accept policy