Flag

We stand with Ukraine and our team members from Ukraine. Here are ways you can help

Get exclusive access to thought-provoking articles, bonus podcast content, and cutting-edge whitepapers. Become a member of the UX Magazine community today!

Home ›› Behavioral Science ›› “You are not the user!!!”- Really?

“You are not the user!!!”- Really?

by Roshan Raju
2 min read
Share this post on
Tweet
Share
Post
Share
Email
Print

Save

“You are not the user!!!”- Really ?

“You are not the user!” This is what designers are supposed to be telling themselves. But this is the real question: “Are they really?” Here is what we’re about to find out!

I have spent the majority of my design career designing for B2B products. My audience has mostly been skilled engineers who are expected to be tech-savvy. After spending considerable time with these B2B products, I wanted to answer a question in the back of my mind – Is it okay to consider myself a possible user for the products and design stuff that I would like in the product?

“You are not the user!!!”- Really? The man is being angry.

“You are not the user” I now prefer to think that these words by Don Norman were supposed to tackle the problem of the False-consensus effect. The false-consensus effect refers to people’s tendency to assume that others share their beliefs and will behave similarly in a given context.

“You are not the user!!!”- Really? The man is smiling and talking about design.

I was really captivated by the phrase — “You are not the user”-in the initial stages of my design career. I used to exclude myself from the target audience completely and rely totally on the user-research insights.

I learned two things through experience.

“You are not the user!!!”- Really? There are 2 people on the picture: a woman and a child. Design for nerd and noob

The B2B companies recruit people from all walks of life with different backgrounds. As a result, the product you develop might not necessarily be always used by tech-savvy Audio Engineer. It could be used by an Engineer who still writes his to-do list on a piece of paper and sticks it on the monitor. It could be used by a complete amateur who is using the product you designed on his first day at the job. As a general rule, it’s better to design for both Noob and Nerd.

“You are not the user!!!”- Really? The man is painting and adding his touch in design.

If all features in a product were to be a subset of the requirements explicitly mentioned by the target audience, then where are we leaving the room for creativity. Pull up to refresh, Long press on a touch screen button, 3D touch, etc., are all examples of creative thinking which have become a mainstay in today’s world.

So maybe, I AM a user… So are you 🙂

“You are not the user!!!”- Really? The man is waving hello at you.
post authorRoshan Raju

Roshan Raju

A designer with a passion for Enterprise Software Design. I love understanding complex systems, breaking it down and presenting it in a form that can be understood and used by all. My current line of work is in the Semiconductor industry where I am designing software for Management and Analysis of huge chunks of measurement data.

Tweet
Share
Post
Share
Email
Print
Ideas In Brief
  • The author questions the statement “You are not the user” and believes it to produce false-consensus effect.
  • If you might be a user of something you are designing for, it may be unnecessary to completely exclude yourself from the target audience and rely totally on the user-research insights. It might be better to design for both Noob and Nerd.

Related Articles

Find out why slapping badges and points into your app doesn’t work and what six principles from real game design actually drive long-term engagement.

Article by Montgomery Singman
Gamification 2.0. Beyond Points and Badges: Designing for Players, Not Metrics. Chapter 2: The Solution
  • The piece argues that gamification fails when game aesthetics are borrowed, but game logic is not. Real game designers use six principles to bring real engagement: authentic mastery, meaningful choice, flow-calibrated challenge, rewarded exploration, self-expressed identity, and real social interdependence. The fix isn’t more mechanics; it’s making the experience itself worth repeating.
Share:Gamification 2.0. Beyond Points and Badges: Designing for Players, Not Metrics. Chapter 2: The Solution
5 min read

Learn how one product designer built a faster, sharper workflow where AI does the scaffolding, judgment owns the outcome, and nothing ships without a traceable why.

Article by Pavel Bukengolts
The Spiral Climbs: Ideas Are Expensive, Systems Are Cheap
  • The piece explores that design is no longer about designing screens but owning systems, bets, and outcomes. But the core judgment, empathy, and research are irreplaceable. I chain Miro, Figma, VS Code, GitHub, and Jira into one traceable loop from idea to learning. AI takes on the exploration and scaffolding. People own architecture, security, and accountability. A 48-hour operating cadence of small, measurable bets, linked artifacts, and documented decisions keeps speed honest.
Share:The Spiral Climbs: Ideas Are Expensive, Systems Are Cheap
6 min read

Discover why the points, badges, and streaks in your favorite apps aren’t really gamification.

Article by Montgomery Singman
Gamification 2.0. Beyond Points and Badges: Designing for Players, Not Metrics. Chapter 1: The Problem
  • The piece claims that most apps misuse gamification, copying superficial mechanics like points and badges that trick rather than motivate people, and that the experience itself is what truly drives engagement, just like good games do.
Share:Gamification 2.0. Beyond Points and Badges: Designing for Players, Not Metrics. Chapter 1: The Problem
4 min read

Join the UX Magazine community!

Stay informed with exclusive content on the intersection of UX, AI agents, and agentic automation—essential reading for future-focused professionals.

Hello!

You're officially a member of the UX Magazine Community.
We're excited to have you with us!

Thank you!

To begin viewing member content, please verify your email.

Get Paid to Test AI Products

Earn an average of $100 per test by reviewing AI-first product experiences and sharing your feedback.

    Tell us about you. Enroll in the course.

      This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Check our privacy policy and