Flag

We stand with Ukraine and our team members from Ukraine. Here are ways you can help

Get exclusive access to thought-provoking articles, bonus podcast content, and cutting-edge whitepapers. Become a member of the UX Magazine community today!

Home ›› Artificial Intelligence ›› Using Conversational AI Platforms to Find the Real ROI

Member-only story

Using Conversational AI Platforms to Find the Real ROI

by UX Magazine Staff
5 min read
Share this post on
Tweet
Share
Post
Share
Email
Print

Save

As conversational AI reshapes business processes, major platforms like OneReach.ai and Cognigy are emerging as pivotal players in scalable implementations. Discover how these platforms orchestrate AI ecosystems, providing long-term value and transforming product design in ways that tools like ChatGPT alone cannot.

With Forrester releasing their new report on conversational AI for customer service, all the major analyst firms (including IDC and Gartner) have compiled similar reports on the top platforms many companies are using to create conversational AI product experiences for their employees and customers. This is happening in a moment where AI agents have come to dominate discussions about how companies can orchestrate business processes using conversational AI. 

While everyone has heard of OpenAI and Google, companies like OneReach.ai and Cognigy might not be well-known by those outside this marketplace. Still, they are among the platforms in Forrester’s report that highlight an often overlooked layer of the market that is critical to scalable implementations of generative AI. 

There is a disconnect between the short-term capabilities of generative tools and the much longer-term strategies that organizations need for actually leveraging the technologies associated with conversational AI. This wave of reports from major analyst groups seems to recognize this, as platforms for orchestrating these kinds of technology are designed to deliver the real business value that organizations are searching for.

Become a member to read the whole content.

Become a member
Tweet
Share
Post
Share
Email
Print

Related Articles

What if grieving your AI isn’t a sign of weakness, but proof it truly helped you grow? This article challenges how we think about emotional bonds with machines.

Article by Bernard Fitzgerald
Grieving the Mirror: Informed Attachment as a Measure of AI’s True Utility
  • The article explores how people can form meaningful and healthy emotional connections with AI when they understand what AI is and isn’t.
  • It introduces the Informed Grievability Test — a way to tell if an AI truly helped someone grow by seeing how they feel if they lose access to it.
  • The piece argues that grieving an AI can be a sign of real value, not weakness or confusion, and calls for more user education and less overly protective design that limits emotional depth in AI tools.
Share:Grieving the Mirror: Informed Attachment as a Measure of AI’s True Utility
7 min read

Who pays the real price for AI’s magic? Behind every smart response is a hidden human cost, and it’s time we saw the hands holding the mirror.

Article by Bernard Fitzgerald
The Price of the Mirror: When Silicon Valley Colonizes the Human Soul
  • The article reveals how AI’s human-like responses rely on the invisible labor of low-paid workers who train and moderate these systems.
  • It describes this hidden labor as a form of “cognitive colonialism,” where human judgment is extracted from the Global South for profit.
  • The piece criticizes the tech industry’s ethical posturing, showing how convenience for some is built on the suffering of others.
Share:The Price of the Mirror: When Silicon Valley Colonizes the Human Soul
7 min read

AI’s promise isn’t about more tools — it’s about orchestrating them with purpose. This article shows why random experiments fail, and how systematic design can turn chaos into ‘Organizational AGI.’

Article by Yves Binda
Random Acts of Intelligence
  • The article critiques the “hammer mentality” of using AI without a clear purpose.
  • It argues that real progress lies in orchestrating existing AI patterns, not chasing new tools.
  • The piece warns that communication complexity — the modern Tower of Babel — is AI’s biggest challenge.
  • It calls for outcome-driven, ethical design to move from random acts to “Organizational AGI.”
Share:Random Acts of Intelligence
5 min read

Join the UX Magazine community!

Stay informed with exclusive content on the intersection of UX, AI agents, and agentic automation—essential reading for future-focused professionals.

Hello!

You're officially a member of the UX Magazine Community.
We're excited to have you with us!

Thank you!

To begin viewing member content, please verify your email.

Tell us about you. Enroll in the course.

    This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Check our privacy policy and