Flag

We stand with Ukraine and our team members from Ukraine. Here are ways you can help

Get exclusive access to thought-provoking articles, bonus podcast content, and cutting-edge whitepapers. Become a member of the UX Magazine community today!

Home ›› Design ›› Three Lessons a Meme Taught Me About User Experience

Three Lessons a Meme Taught Me About User Experience

by Jeff Steen
5 min read
Share this post on
Tweet
Share
Post
Share
Email
Print

Save

The so-called “campus meme” is certainly tried, but is it true?

For the past 15 years, I’ve fancied myself an amateur web designer. I don’t like wireframes or prototypes; I lean on prefab WordPress themes and tweak settings and widgets until clients are happy. 

In all of the design projects I’ve taken on, I confess I have never thought much about UX. This lacuna came to light a few weeks back when I was talking to a friend about my “side gig design stuff.” He asked how I choose my themes and figure out how to set up each site from scratch. “Do you just work with clients,” he pried, “or do you test things with users, too?”

Eventually, he circled around to a fundamental question:

“What is UX anyway? I’ve seen it online a lot but don’t really know what it is.”

I couldn’t answer his question. I made something up at the moment, and then I hurriedly transitioned to highlights of other projects on my plate. 

Later, I did what any amateur web designer with no real UX experience would do: I Googled “user experience.”

What popped up was a mix of meaty articles on UX praxis and a treasure trove of fancy-looking graphs and memes. As a visual learner, I dove into the graphical representations first.; While numerous flowcharts and infographics suggested “best practices” for UX design, the memes told a different story: UX designers are getting it wrong. 

Here’s one example, recently posted by UX Magazine on LinkedIn:

Mems

Source: UX Magazine’s post on LinkedIn

There are many variations of this — what I’ve dubbed the “campus meme”— but they all did one thing exceptionally well: They illuminated my utter lack of consideration for users in website design.

For a decade and a half, I pieced together websites based largely on my own intuition and aesthetic. I never talked to a user and seldom thought about how they would use a website. I had one constituent to please: the client. 

But I knew I could do this UX thing better, so I did some digging. I wanted to find the creator of the original “campus meme” so I can ask him/her, point-blank, what they thought UX should be. Given the evident foibles of designers, how could I best align design and user experience? 

Unfortunately, as with so much multimedia floating around the web, original attribution was impossible to find. From what I can tell, iterations of the “campus meme” go back to 2010 or earlier. And while quotes from the source could not be secured, I got plenty of fiery commentary of designers who stumbled across the meme themselves.

In 2015, for example, designer/architect/general tech guru Mike Atherton called out a fundamental flaw in the meme’s message: It failed to account for the iterative and relationship-centered process that is UX design. “[We define] UX as the process itself. That act of creation, informed by field research and validated through usability testing.“ What’s more, he stressed, “[UX designers] build all the enabling means by which the business and customer connect. We’re relationship engineers.” 

To take that a step further, he decried the meme’s implication that there’s a best practice designers are somehow missing. “In UX, there’s no ‘one-size-fits-all’ design pattern for a given situation. Despite what clients ask, there’s no more a best practice from a UX perspective than there is the best recipe from a cookery perspective. It’s about research, understanding, and evaluation.”

Shain McAlindon, a Senior UX Designer, echoed many of these sentiments two years later in 2017: 

“The problem with the original image is that User Experience is much more than what it depicts. User Experience is not a single thing, it’s not a single job. It’s a continuous, holistic process.

The original image has no outcome, nobody has identified a problem or intervened to make the product better for users, so it can’t be labeled as User Experience.”

Given this flaw, McAlindon thought the following more accurately depicts modern UX design:

Mems

Source: Shane McAlindon/Medium

Lesson number one: UX is an ongoing process that should allow for positive relationship-building between a consumer and a business via a user interface. In my case, a website.

Oddly, though, despite the flurry of arguments against the “campus meme” — calling it reductive and largely unfair to thoughtful UX designers — the meme is still very much alive. Even in the comment thread that followed UX Magazine’s LinkedIn post, commenters agreed the design-experience bifurcation is still a modern UX problem.

Can both sides be right? Yes, it seems — because there’s no one way to “do” UX design. Stewart Pressney, a designer at freelance network company Toptal, captures it pretty well in a single line: “Since the advent of the computer, there has been no consensus on how to engage with technology.” 

Specifically, about UX, he adds: “All in all, UX design is the practical application of empathy used to observe, analyze, and evaluate a user’s engagement with a digital product. It is a broad field with opportunities to engage in user research, information architecture, content strategy, user testing, prototyping, and more.”

Pressney is distinctly positive about this “broad field,” but anything broad is hard to get right. Indeed, UX designers are constantly challenged with achieving a smattering of goals at one time: “UX design attempts to deliver the right solution, in the right way, at the right time, and delight people when they interact with a digital system,” Pressney points out. That’s a big ask.

Lesson number two: Complexity and ambiguity open the door to innumerable UX design possibilities — and problems. Whatever the design approach, however, the most important goal should always be to delight the user.

Back to our pervasive “campus meme.” If we agree that UX design is iterative and involves ongoing research, empathy, and agile development, it hardly seems that a static image captures its best side. 

That said, there are moments when the “campus meme” holds true; as Anna Kaley of research group Nielsen Norman explains, budget constraints, miscommunication, stakeholder pressure, looming deadlines, and a dozen or more other factors often push UX designers to drop user testing, sidestep product vision, skip QA, or altogether disregard standards and style guides. That’s when you see designers carving out paths users won’t take.

For me, an amateur web designer with no formal UX experience, the “campus meme” offers much-needed insight into what UX design should be — and what its potential pitfalls are. For veteran UX designers, I can only hope it serves to keep the debate on best approaches and strategies ever-raging. How else will UX get better?

Indeed, as long as people are interacting with technology, UX design will never be finished. 

We’ll call that lesson number three.

post authorJeff Steen

Jeff Steen

Jeff Steen is a longtime writer and content marketer, covering topics as varied as restaurant culture, health, religion, and technology. He has written for The Denver Post, Inc Magazine, and FitSmallBusiness, among other titles. When he’s not writing, he helps small startups build websites and develop marketing strategies. Learn more at jeffreysteen.com.

Tweet
Share
Post
Share
Email
Print

Related Articles

Real engagement is about designing experiences that people want to have. Here are some things that games do well that most apps don’t.

Article by Montgomery Singman
Gamification 2.0. Beyond Points and Badges: Designing for Players, Not Metrics. Conclusion
  • Most apps use gamification as a manipulation layer to drive metrics, but people engage with things that are truly worthy of their time, not points or streak guilt.
  • Apps that people stick with do this by designing for intrinsic motivation, making the experience itself rewarding.
  • The true measure of success is whether users feel more capable, accomplished, and enriched for having used your app.
Share:Gamification 2.0. Beyond Points and Badges: Designing for Players, Not Metrics. Conclusion
8 min read

For researchers, AI tools are making the move from advising to building easier than ever. But the real obstacle was never technical. Meet the researchers who allowed themselves to create — and what the cost was.

Article by James Lang
The New Makers
  • The article says that becoming a maker as a researcher is less about learning new tools or skills and more about giving yourself a new identity, and that without fixing the internal permission structures that define your swim lane, even the most democratized AI tools won’t turn a researcher into a maker — you don’t have a founder; you have a frustrated advisor with a prototype.
Share:The New Makers
20 min read

Learn why authentic gamification is rooted in game genres rather than just collecting badges.

Article by Montgomery Singman
Gamification 2.0. Beyond Points and Badges: Designing for Players, Not Metrics. Chapter 5: Implementation
  • The article says that successful gamification is picking a game genre that fits your app’s core activities and user psychology, building satisfying intrinsic loops before adding extrinsic rewards, and iterating nonstop, and that without these foundations, you don’t have gamification; you have a progress bar that has a terminal point.
Share:Gamification 2.0. Beyond Points and Badges: Designing for Players, Not Metrics. Chapter 5: Implementation
5 min read

Join the UX Magazine community!

Stay informed with exclusive content on the intersection of UX, AI agents, and agentic automation—essential reading for future-focused professionals.

Hello!

You're officially a member of the UX Magazine Community.
We're excited to have you with us!

Thank you!

To begin viewing member content, please verify your email.

Get Paid to Test AI Products

Earn an average of $100 per test by reviewing AI-first product experiences and sharing your feedback.

    Tell us about you. Enroll in the course.

      This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Check our privacy policy and