Flag

We stand with Ukraine and our team members from Ukraine. Here are ways you can help

Get exclusive access to thought-provoking articles, bonus podcast content, and cutting-edge whitepapers. Become a member of the UX Magazine community today!

Home ›› Design ›› Tablet usability: the future can’t come soon enough

Tablet usability: the future can’t come soon enough

by Steve Workman
2 min read
Share this post on
Tweet
Share
Post
Share
Email
Print

Save

Last weekend I sat on the Tube (the London Underground to international readers), Piccadilly line to be exact, heading into central London. A young man got on and sat down opposite me. He got out a little ASUS netbook, turned it on, and swiveled the lid to use it as a touchscreen. “Awesome,” I thought, “he’s got one of those cool touchscreen netbooks running Windows 7. I’d love one of those, it’d be so convenient.”

I watched the man use the laptop for a while, as he tapped at the screen and used two fingers to scroll on a page. It looked ace—it looked simple. But soon the experience turned sour.

I watched as the man pulled a stylus out from the side of the computer and started to tap at the screen. I thought styluses had been banned by international law since the introduction of the iPhone nearly two and a half years ago. Still, if there are still some things that can’t use the OS zoom function, then maybe a stylus has to be used.

I then received an even greater shock.

I watched in amazement as the man lifted up the screen to try and use the keyboard. Upside down. A CTRL + something command that was not present in the touchscreen menu.

Naturally, as a usability practitioner, I was horrified but continued to watch the bloke struggle. It took him five stabs and glances back at the screen to confirm the action was successful. By this time, the man looked thoroughly frustrated with his program’s choice of shortcut. Soon after, he packed up his laptop and got off the train.

What seems to be the moral story is that no matter how advanced your OS is, the applications that you run can still scupper the experience, especially with tablets. There are two solutions to this problem:

  1. The iPhone way: Touch is the only interaction option. No legacy apps are allowed. It’s an OS designed for touch and for touch only.
  2. The full screen keyboard way: Windows 7 may have a good touchscreen keyboard, but it isn’t implemented in all apps (the iPhone way). You would need a true full-screen multi-touch keyboard, adaptable to different screen sizes, to make it function correctly.

Hopefully there’s a third way: the Apple tablet way. We’ll wait and see about that

This article was originally published on Steve’s blog.

post authorSteve Workman

Steve Workman
Steve Workman is a consultant for PA Consulting Group in London. His job is to design and create applications and web sites using the latest standards-compliant and accessible technology. Steve is the lead mobile developer within PA, making Android and iPhone apps for the enterprise. He is also an organiser of the London Web Standards group who set up educational talks on web standards for people in the London area. Follow him on Twitter @steveworkman or read his personal blog on steveworkman.com

Tweet
Share
Post
Share
Email
Print

Related Articles

Discover how personalization crosses the line from serving users to silently shaping them.

Article by Tushar Deshmukh
The Ethics of Personalization: When UX Crosses the Line from Helpful to Harmful
  • The article argues that personalization walks a fine ethical line between empowering users and quietly manipulating them.
  • It exposes how over-filtering doesn’t just limit content; it limits identity, replacing user curiosity with algorithmic compliance.
  • The piece calls on UX practitioners to treat ethical personalization as a foundational responsibility: one that demands transparency, fairness, and respect for human dignity.
Share:The Ethics of Personalization: When UX Crosses the Line from Helpful to Harmful
4 min read

Learn why your users decide whether to stay or leave before they even understand your product.

Article by Tushar Deshmukh
The Psychology of Onboarding: First Impressions Rule the Brain
  • The article argues that onboarding is not where users begin; it is where they decide whether to stay or leave.
  • It shows that most onboarding failures are not design problems; they are psychological ones.
  • The piece challenges designers to recognize that first impressions are cognitive anchors and that the brain rarely revises its judgments.
Share:The Psychology of Onboarding: First Impressions Rule the Brain
5 min read

Discover how “consent theater” manipulates the psychology of choice, and what ethical design should look like instead.

Article by Tushar Deshmukh
Consent Theater: Are Users Really in Control?
  • The article argues that digital consent mechanisms are designed to look ethical while engineering the opposite outcome.
  • It exposes how legal compliance and ethical design have become dangerously decoupled.
  • The piece challenges designers to recognize that user psychology can serve as a tool for empowerment or a means of manipulation — the choice is theirs.
Share:Consent Theater: Are Users Really in Control?
8 min read

Join the UX Magazine community!

Stay informed with exclusive content on the intersection of UX, AI agents, and agentic automation—essential reading for future-focused professionals.

Hello!

You're officially a member of the UX Magazine Community.
We're excited to have you with us!

Thank you!

To begin viewing member content, please verify your email.

Get Paid to Test AI Products

Earn an average of $100 per test by reviewing AI-first product experiences and sharing your feedback.

    Tell us about you. Enroll in the course.

      This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Check our privacy policy and