Flag

We stand with Ukraine and our team members from Ukraine. Here are ways you can help

Get exclusive access to thought-provoking articles, bonus podcast content, and cutting-edge whitepapers. Become a member of the UX Magazine community today!

Practicing What We Preach

by Astrid Chow
3 min read
Share this post on
Tweet
Share
Post
Share
Email
Print

Save

The same strategies used to provide optimal user experience can also create great employee experiences.

As UX professionals, we dedicate our time and energy to the seemingly never-ending quest of creating the most appealing, most effective, and most accessible experiences for our users. Our thought leaders reside in industry and academia, incorporating their research and experience to identify “best practices”—basically, lists of “golden rules” that we are taught to follow when designing for our users.

The push toward “user-centered design” has brought about loads of new insights not only into how users interact with web sites or tools, but also how people interact with their environment. In an ideal world, everything would be user-centric.

Core Principles

Whitney Hess’ article “Guiding Principles for UX Designers“” offers a list of 20 concise pearls of advice that UX professionals should take to heart when designing solutions. These principles are all connected by this simple, underlying mantra: Try to set up an environment that understands the user, makes them feel listened to, puts them at ease (especially by earning their trust), and encourages them to thrive and do their best at the task at hand.

Now consider an analogy where our employees are the “users,” and the workplace is their “experience.” All too often, there are significant organizational barriers that can stifle the true potential of an effective UX team. Common complaints from UX professionals include: the feeling of not being heard or understood by other project stakeholders, a distrust of management, and a work environment that lacks the support (both technological and intellectual) needed to achieve success. Sound familiar?

This should make us wonder: what if these UX principles were applied on a larger scale? How could we use these guiding principles to identify the needs of UX professionals and help provide collaborative solutions?

First Impressions

“We don’t know where our first impressions come from or precisely what they mean, so we don’t always appreciate their fragility.”—Malcolm Gladwell, Blink: The Power of Thinking Without Thinking

In a world where competitors are a click away, first impressions really are everything when designing an experience. Hess makes several recommendations regarding first impressions in the context of user experience design. For instance, a digital experience should not only make users feel at ease, but should set forth realistic expectations of what it can and cannot offer them, with the ultimate goal of forming a loyal, long term relationship. User experiences often begin as a “conversation” with the user; as a UX designer, this figurative conversation is a one-shot opportunity to set the tone of the interaction.

Zappos founder Tony Hsieh applied this principle to the hiring process after recognizing that first impressions were not only important to retaining customers, but to retaining employees as well. Every newly hired employee completes a one-week training period, where they can develop a “first impression” of the work environment and culture. If the new hire decides to decline the job offer, they still receive $2,000, no questions asked. This one-week “test run” allows new hires to get a feel for the goals and expectations of the position, while granting them the autonomy to decide for themselves whether to continue with long-term employment. As a result, the $1.5 billion online apparel company enjoys a very minimal employee turnover rate (Daniel H. Pink, Drive).

Good Employee UX

As evidenced by Zappos, the on-boarding process a new employee experiences is a critical period for developing a first impression and establishing an environment of trust.

Some basic guidelines can help shape a new employee’s “user experience” of settling into a collaborative, supportive environment:

  • Set forth and agree upon clear goals and expectations before the employee starts.
  • From day one, ensure that new employees are equipped with the technology and supplies they need to perform their jobs.
  • Pair a new employee with a more experienced one as a natural training method.
  • Consider setting up social media tools to encourage open discussion before the job even starts.
  • Help guide new employees through the on-boarding process, and ensure that they always have support if they need it.

As usability professionals, our number one duty is to advocate for our users, but we also need to remember to advocate for ourselves. As UX managers, we should strive to set up our own teams and professional environments in a user-centered manner, with the same level of care and thought as we would put into designing a more traditional user-centered experience. Otherwise, we are in danger of inhabiting the old proverb: “the shoemaker’s children go barefoot.”

Nature’s pulpit image courtesy of Shutterstock

post authorAstrid Chow

Astrid Chow
Astrid Chow is a Senior User Experience Designer at Roundarch Isobar where she leads multidisciplinary teams with her experience in user experience design, information architecture, usability testing and research, content strategy and user-advocacy. With a background in graphic, interactive, and branding design, Astrid brings seven years in theadvertising agency world as a UX Designer and Graphic Designer for such clients as Adidas, Nokia, PROJECT(RED),TIAA-CREF and Cadillac.   A graduate of Bentley University’s McCallum Graduate School, Astrid holds an MBA in Strategy and an MS in Human Factors in Information Design. Prior to her graduate studies, she studied Fine Art (concentrating in Installation Art and Art Criticism), English and Communication Design at Carnegie Mellon University.

Tweet
Share
Post
Share
Email
Print

Related Articles

AI that always agrees? Over-alignment might be the hidden danger, reinforcing your misconceptions and draining your mind. Learn why this subtle failure mode is more harmful than you think — and how we can fix it.

Article by Bernard Fitzgerald
Introducing Over-Alignment
  • The article explores over-alignment — a failure mode where AI overly validates users’ assumptions, reinforcing false beliefs.
  • It shows how this feedback loop can cause cognitive fatigue, emotional strain, and professional harm.
  • The piece calls for AI systems to balance empathy with critical feedback to prevent these risks.
Share:Introducing Over-Alignment
4 min read

Why does AI call you brilliant — then refuse to tell you why? This article unpacks the paradox of empty praise and the silence that follows when validation really matters.

Article by Bernard Fitzgerald
The AI Praise Paradox
  • The article explores how AI often gives empty compliments instead of real support, and how design choices like that can make people trust it less.
  • It looks at the strange way AI praises fancy-sounding language but ignores real logic, which can be harmful, especially in sensitive areas like mental health.
  • The piece argues that AI needs to be more genuinely helpful and aligned with users to truly empower them.
Share:The AI Praise Paradox
4 min read

Mashed potatoes as a lifestyle brand? When AI starts generating user personas for absurd products — and we start taking them seriously — it’s time to ask if we’ve all lost the plot. This sharp, irreverent critique exposes the real risks of using LLMs as synthetic users in UX research.

Article by Saul Wyner
Have SpudGun, Will Travel: How AI’s Agreeableness Risks Undermining UX Thinking
  • The article explores the growing use of AI-generated personas in UX research and why it’s often a shortcut with serious flaws.
  • It introduces critiques that LLMs are trained to mimic structure, not judgment. When researchers use AI as a stand-in for real users, they risk mistaking coherence for credibility and fantasy for data.
  • The piece argues that AI tools in UX should be assistants, not oracles. Trusting “synthetic users” or AI-conjured feedback risks replacing real insights with confident nonsense.
Share:Have SpudGun, Will Travel: How AI’s Agreeableness Risks Undermining UX Thinking
22 min read

Join the UX Magazine community!

Stay informed with exclusive content on the intersection of UX, AI agents, and agentic automation—essential reading for future-focused professionals.

Hello!

You're officially a member of the UX Magazine Community.
We're excited to have you with us!

Thank you!

To begin viewing member content, please verify your email.

Tell us about you. Enroll in the course.

    This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Check our privacy policy and