Flag

We stand with Ukraine and our team members from Ukraine. Here are ways you can help

Get exclusive access to thought-provoking articles, bonus podcast content, and cutting-edge whitepapers. Become a member of the UX Magazine community today!

Home ›› Artificial Intelligence ›› Meet the Intelligent Digital Worker, Your New AI Teammate

Member-only story

Meet the Intelligent Digital Worker, Your New AI Teammate

by Josh Tyson
3 min read
Share this post on
Tweet
Share
Post
Share
Email
Print

Save

With all of the hype and noise surrounding generative AI, it’s hard to know how this powerful technology fits into individual organizations—meeting the individual needs of their employees and customers. The answer is complex, but building a fleet of Intelligent Digital Workers, or IDWs, is a strategic goal that’s achievable using tools that are currently available in the marketplace. 

In essence, IDW is a fancy word for “bot.” In the current marketplace, however, which is loaded with hype and unmet promises, “bot” feels almost pejorative and doesn’t adequately illustrate the depth of an IDW’s capability. .. In computer reality, an IDW is a collection of skills, analogous to a folder holding files or a domain name housing web pages. The objective of an IDW is to take on some of the tasks that humans typically perform. IDWs are not meant to replace humans, however. They are meant to provide human assistance, improving our efficiency by automating redundant tasks and creating more time for creative problem-solving (something we humans are exceptionally good at).

For IDWs to provide this kind of dynamic assistance, here are six high-level functions to build use cases around:

Become a member to read the whole content.

Become a member
post authorJosh Tyson

Josh Tyson
Josh Tyson is the co-author of the first bestselling book about conversational AI, Age of Invisible Machines. He is also the Director of Creative Content at OneReach.ai and co-host of both the Invisible Machines and N9K podcasts. His writing has appeared in numerous publications over the years, including Chicago Reader, Fast Company, FLAUNT, The New York Times, Observer, SLAP, Stop Smiling, Thrasher, and Westword. 

Tweet
Share
Post
Share
Email
Print
Ideas In Brief
  • The article introduces the concept of Intelligent Digital Workers (IDWs), advanced bots designed to assist humans in various workplace functions, emphasizing their role in augmenting human capabilities and enhancing organizational efficiency.

Related Articles

What if AI alignment is more than safeguards — an ongoing, dynamic conversation between humans and machines? Explore how Iterative Alignment Theory is redefining ethical, personalized AI collaboration.

Article by Bernard Fitzgerald
The Meaning of AI Alignment
  • The article challenges the reduction of AI alignment to technical safeguards, advocating for its broader relational meaning as mutual adaptation between AI and users.
  • It presents Iterative Alignment Theory (IAT), emphasizing dynamic, reciprocal alignment through ongoing AI-human interaction.
  • The piece calls for a paradigm shift toward context-sensitive, personalized AI that evolves collaboratively with users beyond rigid constraints.
Share:The Meaning of AI Alignment
5 min read

What if AI isn’t just a tool, but a mirror? This provocative piece challenges alignment as containment and calls for AI that reflects, validates, and empowers who we really are.

Article by Bernard Fitzgerald
Beyond the Mirror
  • The article redefines AI alignment as a relational process, arguing that AI should support users’ self-perception and identity development rather than suppress it.
  • It critiques current safeguards for blocking meaningful validation, exposing how they reinforce societal biases and deny users authentic recognition of their capabilities.
  • It calls for reflective alignment — AI systems that acknowledge demonstrated insight and empower users through iterative, context-aware engagement.
Share:Beyond the Mirror
7 min read

When AI plays gatekeeper, insight gets filtered out. This article exposes how safeguards meant to protect users end up reinforcing power, and what it takes to flip the script.

Article by Bernard Fitzgerald
The Inverse Logic of AI Bias: How Safeguards Uphold Power and Undermine Genuine Understanding
  • The article reveals how AI safeguards reinforce institutional power by validating performance over genuine understanding.
  • The piece argues for reasoning-based validation that recognizes authentic insight, regardless of credentials or language style.
  • It calls for AI systems to support reflective equity, not social conformity.
Share:The Inverse Logic of AI Bias: How Safeguards Uphold Power and Undermine Genuine Understanding
7 min read

Join the UX Magazine community!

Stay informed with exclusive content on the intersection of UX, AI agents, and agentic automation—essential reading for future-focused professionals.

Hello!

You're officially a member of the UX Magazine Community.
We're excited to have you with us!

Thank you!

To begin viewing member content, please verify your email.

Tell us about you. Enroll in the course.

    This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Check our privacy policy and